ive
User not Logged..
India's Biggest Headnotes Library over 53.69 Lakhs Headnotes
    Free Artificial Intelligence Drafting  

    Free Artificial Intelligence Case Analyzer  

   AI Submission Generator   

Latest Cases

(241) SRI C.P. SELVARAJ Vs. SRI K.M. RAJENDRAN[KARNATAKA HIGH COURT] 13-10-2025
Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957 — Section 33, 34, 35 — Admissibility of insufficient stamp duty documents — A court can recall an order admitting an instrument in evidence if it was insufficiently stamped, even if admitted without objection and marked as an exhibit, provided there was no prior “judicial determination” of its admissibility and stamp duty sufficiency. The court can exercise inherent powers
India Law Library Docid # 2434631

(242) COMMANDANT BENGAL ENGINEERING GROUP & CENTRE ROORKEE Vs. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND[UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT] 13-10-2025
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 133 — Removal of nuisance — Jurisdiction of Sub-Divisional Magistrate — Dispute concerning a pathway on defence land — Court found that the land in question, Khasra No.710, was recorded as a public pathway ("gauhar raasta") and had been in longstanding public use. The Sub-Divisional Magistrate acted within jurisdiction under Section 133 Cr.P.C. to
India Law Library Docid # 2434688

(243) ANJU AND ANOTHER Vs. RINKU DAHIYA[DELHI HIGH COURT] 11-10-2025
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 — Section 24 — Interim Maintenance — Both spouses equally qualified and earning — Wife earning Rs. 2.5 lakhs per month, husband earning USD 7134 (approx. Rs. 5.6 lakhs by simple exchange, Rs. 1.65 lakhs by PPP) per month — Wife not entitled to maintenance as she is not financially handicapped and can litigate — Object of
India Law Library Docid # 2434702

(244) S.K. JAIN Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 10-10-2025
Army Act, 1950 — Sections 63 and 69 — Possession of ammunition — Substitution of conviction — Tribunal can substitute conviction from a civil offence (Section 69) to an act prejudicial to good order and discipline (Section 63) if evidence supports the latter and the original court-martial could have lawfully found the accused guilty of the substituted offence.
India Law Library Docid # 2433771

(245) ANIRUDH DAWAR AND OTHERS Vs. STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR[DELHI HIGH COURT] 10-10-2025
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita — Section 528 — Quashing of FIR — Settlement between parties — Marriage dispute — FIR registered under Sections 498A/406/377/34 IPC — Parties amicably resolved their disputes, entered into a settlement agreement, and obtained a divorce — Respondent No. 2 (complainant) confirmed settlement and had no objection to quashing the FIR — State also had no objection — Held, in view of settlement and to secure ends of justice, FIR and
India Law Library Docid # 2433775

(246) M/S AMD ESTATES AND DEVELOPERS PVT LTD. Vs. M/S VSR INFRATECH PVT LTD[DELHI HIGH COURT] 10-10-2025
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Section 9 — Interim relief — Principles for grant — Prima facie case, balance of convenience, and irreparable injury — Court's role is to preserve subject matter of dispute and ensure award is not infructuous, not to
India Law Library Docid # 2433779

(247) KOMAL GARG (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH HER LRS. Vs. MOHIT ARORA AND OTHERS[DELHI HIGH COURT] 10-10-2025
Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 — Section 14(1)(e) — Eviction petition — Bona fide need of landlord — Requirement for storing business equipment/tools due to space crunch — Landlord’s need is genuine and sincere, not whimsical or fanciful.
India Law Library Docid # 2433781

(248) HARISH Vs. STATE (GNCT OF DELHI) AND ANOTHER[DELHI HIGH COURT] 10-10-2025
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — Sections 483, 528 (Corresponding to CrPC Sections 439, 482) — Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 376AB — POCSO Act, 2012 — Sections 6, 21 — Bail Application — Grant of bail is not solely based on gravity of accusation but on necessity of continued detention — Court must consider reasonable grounds for belief of guilt, nature of accusation, severity of punishment, likelihood of absconding, and possibility of repetition of offence.
India Law Library Docid # 2433783

(249) G. PRASAD RAGHAVAN Vs. UNION TERRITORY OF PUDUCHERRY[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 10-10-2025
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) —Sections 420, 406, 294(b), 506(i) read with Section 34 — Cheating, Criminal Breach of Trust, Obscene acts and songs, Criminal Intimidation — Discharge — Appellant was a minor at the time of the primary transaction of sale agreement and payment of money — No allegations that the appellant made any representation or induced the informant — Subsequent purchase
India Law Library Docid # 2433904

(250) STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH Vs. AEHSAN[HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 10-10-2025
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 — Section 20 — Recovery of Charas — Discrepancies in witness testimonies — Place of apprehension, steps taken after apprehension, and proceedings on the spot — Material contradictions leading to doubt — Case property preparation in CIA office and not on spot — Independent witnesses not supporting prosecution — Accused falsely implicated —
India Law Library Docid # 2434032

(251) HIMACHAL PRADESH STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD LIMITED Vs. HCL INFOTECH LIMITED[HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 10-10-2025
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Section 34(3) — Condonation of delay — Application for setting aside an arbitral award must be filed within three months from the date of receipt of the award, with an additional grace period of thirty days if sufficient cause is shown.
India Law Library Docid # 2434033

(252) STATE OF H.P. Vs. HARNAM SINGH[HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 10-10-2025
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 — Sections 7 and 13(2) — Appeal against acquittal — Appellate court’s power to interfere with acquittal — High Court can interfere if acquittal is perverse, based on misreading or omission of material evidence, and no reasonable view other than guilt is possible — Double presumption of innocence favours accused in acquittal cases.
India Law Library Docid # 2434081

(253) KASHMIR CHAND SHADYAL Vs. STATE OF H.P. AND OTHERS[HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 10-10-2025
Hindu Public Religious Institutions and Charitable Endowments Act, 1984 — Sections 22, 23 and 17 — Writ petition seeking directions for strict compliance of the Act — Court emphasized the historical and multifaceted role of temples in Indian society, including education, social welfare, arts, and even the freedom struggle — Highlighted the constitutional mandate under Article 25 for social reform and
India Law Library Docid # 2434090

(254) EX. HAV (CLK) SURJIT SINGH AND ANOTHER Vs. STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AND OTHERS[HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 10-10-2025
Service Law — Ex-servicemen — Appointment Procedure — Government Instructions — Nomination by Ex-servicemen Cell — Requirement for Issuing Appointment Letters within 15 Days of Nomination — Departmental Violation of Instructions — Impact on Accrued Rights of Appointment — Denial of Regular Appointment Contrary to Statutory Rules and Requisition Conditions — Arbirtrary
India Law Library Docid # 2434091

(255) CH THORU DIN (DIED) THROUGH LRS AND OTHERS Vs. THE UNION TERRITORY OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND OTHERS[JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH HIGH COURT (JAMMU BENCH)] 10-10-2025
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Order 9 Rule 4 — Restoration of suit dismissed for non-prosecution — Condonation of delay — Requirements — Plaintiff must apply within 30 days with satisfactory explanation for delay and demonstrate prima facie case — Restoration is an equitable remedy requiring bona fide intentions and reasonable diligence — Delay beyond 30 days can be condoned under Article 122 of Limitation Act for sufficient cause.
India Law Library Docid # 2434103

(256) SHEIKH MOHD. ASLAM AND ANOTHER Vs. MAHESH SINGH JAMWAL[JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH HIGH COURT (JAMMU BENCH)] 10-10-2025
Constitution of India, 1950 — Article 227 — Supervisory jurisdiction of High Court — High Court's power under Article 227 is to ensure subordinate courts and tribunals exercise powers within their authority and act in accordance with law — It is a supervisory and not an appellate power — High Court should not correct all errors of judgment or re-appreciate evidence unless there is grave dereliction of duty, flagrant abuse of fundamental principles of law or justice, or a miscarriage of justice.
India Law Library Docid # 2434104

(257) SAJJAD AHMED Vs. UNION TERRITORY OF J&K[JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH HIGH COURT (JAMMU BENCH)] 10-10-2025
Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 — Section 19 — Providing support to terrorists — Bail application — Petitioner seeking bail after custody for over a year and charges framed — Trial court had previously rejected bail on the grounds that challan had not been produced — Subsequent filing of challan and framing of charges constitute changed circumstances — Bail granted.
India Law Library Docid # 2434105

(258) TARUN SHARMA Vs. UNION TERRITORY OF J & K AND OTHERS[JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH HIGH COURT (JAMMU BENCH)] 10-10-2025
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 174 — Death by a stranger — Inquest proceedings — Initial stage of investigation into a suspicious death — Inquest proceedings are a preliminary inquiry to ascertain if a death occurred and if it was due to foul play, not to identify the offender at this stage.
India Law Library Docid # 2434106

(259) BARKET ALI Vs. DIVISIONAL MANAGER SFC DIVISION BHADERWAH[JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH HIGH COURT (JAMMU BENCH)] 10-10-2025
Constitution of India, 1950 — Article 226 — Writ of Mandamus — Quashing of Judgment — Petition filed seeking quashment of a judgment allowing an appeal and setting aside an award under the Payment of Wages Act.
India Law Library Docid # 2434107

(260) GHULAM HAIDER AND ANOTHER Vs. KAMLESH SINGH AND OTHERS[JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH HIGH COURT (JAMMU BENCH)] 10-10-2025
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Section 47, Section 50 and Order 21 Rules 97, 98, 101 — Execution of decree — Objections by legal heirs claiming independent rights — Executing court's duty to decide such claims — The executing court is bound to adjudicate the claim of an objector even if they were not a party to the original suit or the decree was not passed against them, provided the claim relates to the execution, discharge, or satisfaction of the decree. A claim for independent rights
India Law Library Docid # 2434108