ive
User not Logged..
India's Biggest Headnotes Library over 53.69 Lakhs Headnotes
     Free Artificial Intelligence Case Analyzer  

   AI Submission Generator [on behalf of Appellant/Respondent]  

Latest Cases

(241) GLENCORE INTERNATIONAL AG Vs. M/S. SHREE GANESH METALS AND ANOTHER[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 25-08-2025
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Section 45 — Reference to arbitration — Existence of arbitration agreement — Contract not signed by one party — Parties acted upon the contract, including lifting goods and issuing Letters of Credit — Emails confirming terms and modifications — Held, agreement to arbitrate is inferred from conduct and electronic communications, even without signatures — Mere failure
India Law Library Docid # 2429051

(242) CHOWDAMMA (D) BY LR AND ANOTHER Vs. VENKATAPPA (D) BY LRS AND ANOTHER[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 25-08-2025
Evidence Act, 1872 — Section 50 — Opinion on relationship, when relevant — Testimony of a witness with special means of knowledge of the relationship, including opinion expressed by conduct, is relevant — Witness resided in the same village, had long-standing familiarity, and spoke from personal observation, thus satisfying the requirement of special means of knowledge. (Paras 20, 21, 25,
India Law Library Docid # 2429052

(243) RAVINDRA PRATAP SHAHI Vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 25-08-2025
Criminal Procedure — Delay in Judgment Pronouncement — Supreme Court directs High Courts to adhere to existing guidelines for timely pronouncement of reserved judgments and reiterates specific directions for cases where judgment is not delivered within three months of being reserved, including placing the matter before the Chief Justice for reassignment if not pronounced within two weeks thereafter.
India Law Library Docid # 2429053

(244) SRI R RAGHU Vs. SRI G M KRISHNA AND ANOTHER[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 25-08-2025
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Order 21 Rule 90 & Section 47 — Setting aside of sale — Application for — Delay — HC correctly held that application to set aside sale was barred by limitation as it was filed almost two years three months after the sale, and Section 5 of Limitation Act does not apply to proceedings under Order
India Law Library Docid # 2429054

(245) VASANTA SAMPAT DUPARE Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 25-08-2025
Constitution of India, 1950 — Article 32 — Writ jurisdiction for enforcement of Fundamental Rights — Death sentence cases — Article 32 as continuing safeguard even after conventional judicial process has concluded — Power to intervene under Article 32 to prevent constitutional breach when human life hangs in the balance.
India Law Library Docid # 2429060

(246) SURENDRA DHARIWAL Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ANOTHER ETC RESPONDENT(S)[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 25-08-2025
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 — Section 17A — Requirement of prior approval for inquiry or investigation against public servant — Exception for on-the-spot arrest — FIR quashed by High Court solely on the ground of non-compliance with Section 17A — Supreme Court holds that the High Court should have considered other grounds for quashing the FIR — Matters remanded to High Court
India Law Library Docid # 2432118

(247) IN RE : T.N. GODAVARMAN THIRUMULPAD Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 25-08-2025
Forests (Conservation) Act, 1980 — Section 2 — Protected Forest — Fragmented Land Parcels — Application to modify earlier judgment to allow use of land parcels less than 3 hectares and not adjoining any forest area for public purposes — Application rejected as state can take recourse to Section 3(2) of Forest Rights Act, 2006 — Clarification that use of such land for purposes under Section 3(2) of Forest
India Law Library Docid # 2432208

(248) YASEEN Vs. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND AND OTHERS[UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT] 25-08-2025
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 — Sections 4, 6, 7, 9 and 11 — Public Purpose — Land for Police Station and Nagar Panchayat Office — High Court's direction to District Magistrate to decide on suitability of land — District Magistrate's order allotting land based on site inspection and reports considered commercial viability, accessibility, existing government orders, approval of tenders, and impact on law and
India Law Library Docid # 2432353

(249) STATE OF UTTARANCHAL Vs. RAJPAL YADAV AND ANOTHER[UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT] 25-08-2025
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Sections 323, 325, 394 — Appeal against acquittal — High Court’s power to interfere — While appellate court has full power to review evidence, it must respect the trial court’s acquittal if two reasonable conclusions are possible from the evidence, especially in criminal cases where presumption of innocence is strengthened by acquittal. Interference is only warranted if the trial
India Law Library Docid # 2432354

(250) DEVENDRA MEHRA AND ANOTHER Vs. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND AND ANOTHER[UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT] 25-08-2025
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 482 — Quashing of proceedings — Abuse of process — High Court's inherent power to prevent misuse of legal process or secure justice — Matters involving disputed facts and evidence appreciation are typically for trial, but inherent powers can be exercised in exceptional cases.
India Law Library Docid # 2432355

(251) ABHILASHA SAXENA AND OTHERS Vs. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND AND OTHERS[UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT] 25-08-2025
Constitution of India, 1950 — Article 226 — Writ of Mandamus — Age Relaxation — Court cannot grant age relaxation as it is a policy matter for the employer — However, where recruitment processes are repeatedly aborted and rules changed causing candidates to become age-barred, the Court may direct that the original cut-off date for age be applied to ensure fairness, especially when a previous selection process was also deemed unfair due to delays.
India Law Library Docid # 2432356

(252) TARKENDRA VAISHNAV AND ANOTHER Vs. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND AND ANOTHER[UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT] 25-08-2025
Uttarakhand Cooperative Societies Rules, 2004 — Rule 271(ii) and Rule 272(4) — Pension and Post-Retiral Benefits — Revision — Members of Cooperative Tribunal appointed after superannuation from parent service are entitled to recalculation of pension and gratuity based on their tenure as Tribunal members, in addition to benefits already received from parent service
India Law Library Docid # 2432357

(253) DEEPAK SINGH BISHT Vs. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND[UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT] 25-08-2025
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Sections 302, 201 — Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 — Section 3(2)(v) — Murder, Causing disappearance of evidence of offence — Conviction based on circumstantial evidence — Prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the room from which blood-stained articles were recovered belonged to the appellant — Witness testimonies regarding the ownership of the room were hearsay and uncorroborated —
India Law Library Docid # 2432358

(254) BHEEMARAYA @ BHEEMAREDDY @ REDDY Vs. STATE[KARNATAKA HIGH COURT (KALABURAGI BENCH)] 23-08-2025
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 366A — Procuration of minor girl — Ingredients of Section 366A require inducing a minor girl with the intent that she may be forced or seduced into illicit intercourse with another person — Evidence showed the accused took the minor girl and subjected her to sexual acts, but not that he procured her for intercourse with another person — Conviction under Section 366A was set aside as the
India Law Library Docid # 2432155

(255) SRI. KAMAL KUMAR JAIN Vs. BENAKA SPONGE IRON PVT. LTD. AND OTHERS[KARNATAKA HIGH COURT (DHARWAD BENCH)] 23-08-2025
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 — Sections 138 and 139 — Dishonour of cheque — Presumption in favour of holder — Issuance of cheque admitted — Trial court erred in acquitting accused when presumption of legally enforceable debt under Section 139 was not rebutted — Accused failed to rebut presumption by adducing evidence — Appeal allowed, acquittal set aside, and accused convicted.
India Law Library Docid # 2432156

(256) SALDANHA REAL ESTATE PRIVATE LIMITED AND OTHERS Vs. BISHOP JOHN RODRIGUES AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 22-08-2025
Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971 — Sections 3B, 3C, 13, 14 — Slum Rehabilitation Area (SR Area) — Landowner's preferential right to redevelop — Pre-amendment settled law holds landowner has preferential right, must be notified and invited to develop, and acquisition under Section 14 cannot precede extinguishment of this right — 2018 Amendment does not
India Law Library Docid # 2428976

(257) TARABAI NAGAR CO-OP. HOG. SOCIETY (PROPOSED) Vs. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 22-08-2025
Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971 — Chapter I-A — Slum Rehabilitation Schemes — Preferential right of landowner to redevelop — Section 3B(4)(e) and Section 13(1) confer a preferential right on the landowner to redevelop a Slum Rehabilitation Area (SR Area) — SRA can undertake redevelopment only if the landowner fails to come forward with a scheme within a
India Law Library Docid # 2428977

(258) SHAH SAMIR BHARATBHAI AND OTHERS Vs. THE STATE OF GUJARAT AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 22-08-2025
Constitution of India, 1950 — Article 14, 39(d) and 43 — Equal pay for equal work — Contractual Assistant Professors performing identical duties as regularly appointed or ad-hoc Assistant Professors are entitled to the minimum pay scale of Assistant Professors.
India Law Library Docid # 2428985

(259) UNION TERRITORY OF J & K (PREVIOUSLY STATE OF JAMMU & KASHMIR) AND ANOTHER Vs. RAJA MUZAFFAR BHAT AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 22-08-2025
Environment Protection Act, 1986 and EIA Notification, 2006 — Sand Mining — Prior Environmental Clearance (EC) — District Survey Report (DSR) — Replenishment Study — Validity of EC granted without a proper DSR and replenishment study.
India Law Library Docid # 2428986

(260) PALM GROVES COOPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD. Vs. M/s MAGAR GIRME AND GAIKWAD ASSOCIATES ETC.[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 22-08-2025
Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Section 25 — Enforcement of orders — Amendment by 2002 Act — Anomalous position for final orders — Court can interpret to fill lacunae, applying purposive construction to achieve legislative intent of effective redressal for consumers.
India Law Library Docid # 2428988