ive
User not Logged..
India's Biggest Headnotes Library over 53.69 Lakhs Headnotes
     Free Artificial Intelligence Case Analyzer  

   AI Submission Generator [on behalf of Appellant/Respondent]  

Latest Cases

(361) ALOK KUMAR Vs. THE STATE OF BIHAR AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 12-08-2025
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 161 — Statements — Clubbing of FIRs — Where multiple FIRs are registered against a builder for similar offences related to home buyers, and the builder undertakes to settle claims by depositing money and providing security, this Court can direct clubbing of all FIRs and treat subsequent FIRs as statements under Section 161 CrPC to facilitate a comprehensive
India Law Library Docid # 2432123

(362) DR. RAJESH KUMAR GUPTA Vs. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND AND ANOTHER[UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT] 12-08-2025
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 — Sections 8, 22 — Drugs and Magic Remedies (Objectionable Advertisements) Act, 1954 — Sections 4, 7 — Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Sections 224, 420 — Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 482 — Quashing of proceedings — Applicability of exemptions under NDPS Act and Drugs and Cosmetics Act — Conditions for exemption — Mere potential for
India Law Library Docid # 2432427

(363) DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX, AND OTHERS Vs. DOLPHIN DRILLING PTE LIMITED[UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT] 12-08-2025
Income Tax Act, 1961 — Sections 147, 148 — Reassessment Proceedings — Appeal against setting aside of reassessment notices — Issue of ownership of drilling ship and eligibility for depreciation — High Court quashed reassessment notices on the ground that the issue of ownership was previously decided, and reopening was barred — Supreme Court held that the question of ownership was not decided in previous
India Law Library Docid # 2432428

(364) TIME CITY INFRASTRUCTURE AND HOUSING LIMITED LUCKNOW Vs. THE STATE OF U.P. AND OTHER[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 11-08-2025
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) – Order 39 Rule 3 and Proviso – Grant of ex parte injunction – Requirements – Court must record reasons for granting injunction without notice to the opposite party, and the applicant must comply with clauses (a) and (b) of the proviso – Compliance is mandatory.
India Law Library Docid # 2428626

(365) GURDEEP SINGH Vs. THE STATE OF PUNJAB[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 11-08-2025
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Sections 307, 120B, 225, 186, 332, 353 — Attempt to murder, criminal conspiracy, escape or attempt to escape from custody, obstructing public servant, voluntarily causing hurt to deter public servant from his duty, assault or criminal force to deter public servant from discharge of his duty — Conviction and sentence upheld — Appellant, an Assistant Superintendent of Jail, facilitated escape
India Law Library Docid # 2428558

(366) ARSHNOOR KAUR AND ANOTHER Vs. THE UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 11-08-2025
Army Act, 1950 — Section 12 — Notification permitting women to join JAG branch — Restriction on number of women candidates not permissible — Union of India cannot impose additional restrictions beyond Section 12 by policy or administrative instruction.
India Law Library Docid # 2428559

(367) IN RE: “CITY HOUNDED BY STRAYS, KIDS PAY PRICE”[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 11-08-2025
Constitution of India, 1950 – Article 19(1)(d) & 21 – Fundamental Rights – Infringement of – Stray dogs – Presence of stray dogs on streets and public places constitutes infringement of right to move freely and right to life and personal liberty – State has a duty to prevent such infringement.
India Law Library Docid # 2428702

(368) IN RE: N. PEDDI RAJU AND OTHERS ...ALLEGED CONTEMNORS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 11-08-2025
Contempt of Court — Scandalous allegations against Judges — Transfer petition based on apprehension of partiality and procedural discrimination due to summary curtailment of arguments and political status of a respondent — Supreme Court dismissed transfer petition but issued notice for contempt due to scandalous remarks against High Court Judge.
India Law Library Docid # 2428719

(369) ARVIND KUMAR JALOTA Vs. RAKESH KUMAR GOYAL[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 11-08-2025
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Order 7 Rule 11, Order 8 Rule 1 — Striking off defence — Non-filing of reply to rent petition — Revision petition challenging such order — Court granted tenant-petitioner one opportunity to file reply subject to payment of costs — Emphasised that failure to comply would result in dismissal of the revision petition — Directed expeditious disposal of the matter by the Rent Controller.
India Law Library Docid # 2428888

(370) ASHA RANI AND OTHERS Vs. RAJ KUMAR[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 11-08-2025
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Order 41 Rule 27 — Additional Evidence — Appellate Stage — Additional evidence can be permitted at the appellate stage if the applicant shows that despite due diligence, the evidence was not available during trial — In this case, the applicant was aware of the judgment during the trial, but no reason was given for not producing it earlier — Therefore, the application for additional evidence was correctly dismissed.
India Law Library Docid # 2428889

(371) VIRENDER SHARMA AND ANOTHER Vs. MANPREET KAUR AND OTHERS[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 11-08-2025
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — Section 15(1) — Renewal of Driving Licences — Application for renewal filed before expiry — If application for renewal of a driving licence is filed within 30 days before the date of expiry, it is considered automatically renewed and the driver possesses a valid licence, even if an accident occurs during this period.
India Law Library Docid # 2428890

(372) PUNJAB SMALL INDUSTRIES AND EXPORT CORPORATION LTD. Vs. M/S. BHULLAR CONSTRUCTION COMPANY AND ANOTHER[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 11-08-2025
Limitation Act, 1963 — Section 5 — Condonation of delay — Appeal against order of Commercial Court — Period of limitation prescribed by Commercial Courts Act, 2015 — Section 13(1A) of Commercial Courts Act dictates a 60-day period for appeals from District Judge level Commercial Courts — Condonation of delay under Section 5 of Limitation Act is permissible but delay must be explained by sufficient cause —
India Law Library Docid # 2428891

(373) INDIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION AND ANOTHER Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 11-08-2025
Consumer Protection — Misleading Advertisements — Drugs and Magic Remedies (Objectionable Advertisements) Act, 1954 — Consumer Protection Act, 2019 — Indian Medical Association sought action against Patanjali Ayurved Ltd. for violations. Court noted substantial achievement of petitioners' original prayers through various orders. — Writ Petition disposed of as prayers substantially achieved,
India Law Library Docid # 2432120

(374) KISHUNDEO ROUT AND OTHERS Vs. GOVIND RAO AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 08-08-2025
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) – Section 96, 107 — Adverse Possession — Plea of — Foundation for the plea of adverse possession must be laid in the pleadings and an issue must be framed and tried — A plea not properly raised in the pleadings or in issues at the stage of trial would not be permitted to be raised for the first time at
India Law Library Docid # 2428627

(375) KRISHNAKANT KWIVEDY AND ANOTHER Vs. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 08-08-2025
Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 — Sections 3 and 4 — Quashing of FIR — High Court quashed proceedings against certain respondents stating allegations were vague and omnibus — Supreme Court found specific allegations with dates and times, indicating prima facie commission of offences — Supreme Court disagreed with the High Court's assessment of vagueness and omnibus allegations, holding that FIR
India Law Library Docid # 2428628

(376) NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED Vs. SUNITA DEVI AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 08-08-2025
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Section 147(5), 149(1), 166 — Liability of Insurer — Cancellation of Policy — Dishonoured cheque for premium — Intimation to insured and RTO — Insurer absolved from liability upon intimation, but directed to pay and recover from owner in larger interest of justice.
India Law Library Docid # 2428542

(377) KULWINDER KAUR AND OTHERS Vs. PARSHANT SHARMA AND ANOTHER[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 08-08-2025
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — Section 166 — Compensation — Fatal accident — Deceased was self-employed in USA, earning in dollars — Claimants sought enhanced compensation including future prospects — High Court enhanced compensation but disregarded future prospects — Supreme Court held that future prospects must be considered for self-employed individuals aged below 40, granting 40% addition to income.
India Law Library Docid # 2428543

(378) THANGAVEL AND OTHERS Vs. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, TAMIL NADU STATE TRANSPORT CORPORATION LIMITED[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 08-08-2025
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — Section 166 — Compensation calculation for death of child — Income of child — High Court erred in applying Schedule II income when negligence was proven and claim was under Section 166; Tribunal's adoption of Rs. 5,000/- per month for a 10-year-old was appropriate.
India Law Library Docid # 2428544

(379) BRIJ BIHARI GUPTA Vs. MANMET AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 08-08-2025
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — Sections 147 and 50 — Insurance Policy — Liability of Insurer — Gratuitous Passenger — Transfer of Ownership — Goods Vehicle — Passengers accompanying goods are not gratuitous passengers and are covered under Section 147(1)(b)(i) — High Court interfered with Tribunal’s finding without material — Ownership transfer requires registration of the vehicle as per Section 50 — Mere possession of vehicle does not transfer ownership — Registered owner liable for
India Law Library Docid # 2428545

(380) SHYAM KALI DUBEY Vs. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 08-08-2025
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 302 — Murder — Acquittal — Reasonable doubt — Prosecution’s case regarding time of death contradicted by medical evidence and eyewitness testimony on location of incident where body was found — Unexplained injuries on parents of deceased, admitted family dispute, and improbable dying declaration create reasonable doubt about guilt — Appellant entitled to benefit of doubt.
India Law Library Docid # 2428546