ive
User not Logged..
India's Biggest Headnotes Library over 53.69 Lakhs Headnotes
    Free Artificial Intelligence Drafting  

    Free Artificial Intelligence Case Analyzer  

   AI Submission Generator   

Latest Cases

(1) SMT. ROSHNI DEVI Vs. THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND OTHERS[TELANGANA HIGH COURT] 28-10-2025
Telangana Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers, Dacoits, Drug-Offenders, Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders, Land Grabbers, Spurious Seed Offenders, Insecticides Offenders, Fertilizer Offenders, Food Adulteration Offenders, Fake Document Offenders, Scheduled Commodities Offenders, Forest Offenders, Gaming Offenders, Sexual Offenders, Explosive Substances Offenders, Arms
India Law Library Docid # 2434623

(2) SRI SAI SAPTHAGIRI SPONGE PVT. LTD. Vs. STATE (GNCT OF DELHI)[DELHI HIGH COURT] 27-10-2025
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 — Section 138 — Dishonour of cheque — Quashing of proceedings — Cheques issued as security and not for consideration — Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) clearly stated cheques were for security purposes to show banks and not for deposit — Complainant failed to read the complete terms of MOU in isolation and misinterpreted it to claim cheques were
India Law Library Docid # 2434579

(3) P S JAYAKUMAR AND OTHERS Vs. STATE (NCT OF DELHI) AND OTHERS[DELHI HIGH COURT] 27-10-2025
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Sections 499, 500, 34 — Criminal Defamation — Essential Ingredients — To constitute defamation, there must be an imputation concerning a person, made with intent to harm reputation, or knowledge/belief that it will harm reputation — A company, being an artificial entity, lacks the intention
India Law Library Docid # 2434586

(4) MR.SAMPRAS ANTHONY Vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA AND OTHERS[KARNATAKA HIGH COURT] 25-10-2025
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 — Section 64 — Rape — Quashing of proceedings — Consensual sex versus rape — Meeting on dating app — Physical intimacy alleged to be non-consensual after withdrawal of consent — Petitioner claims chats demonstrate consensual acts — Court's duty to distinguish between breach of promise to marry and false promise — Mere disappointment in a relationship does not
India Law Library Docid # 2434540

(5) MR.FAKIRAPPA HATTI Vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA[KARNATAKA HIGH COURT] 25-10-2025
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Sections 376, 417, 323, 506 — Rape, Cheating, Assault, Criminal Intimidation — Quashing of Proceedings — Section 482 Cr.P.C. — Consensual relationship — Breach of promise to marry — False promise — Supreme Court held that a consensual sexual relationship for three years between parties, even if there was a promise of marriage that was not fulfilled, does not constitute rape or cheating — The complainant, who was already married with three children, cannot
India Law Library Docid # 2434541

(6) RAJU APPASAB GHEND AND OTHER Vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND OTHERS[KARNATAKA HIGH COURT (DHARWAD BENCH)] 25-10-2025
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 304-B — Dowry death — Essential ingredients are: death of a woman caused otherwise than under normal circumstances within seven years of marriage; victim subjected to cruelty or harassment by husband or relative in connection with demand for dowry; husband or relative deemed to have caused her death — Presumption arises under Section 113B of Evidence Act if
India Law Library Docid # 2434555

(7) DENABOINA LAVAN KUMAR Vs. THE STATE OF TELANGANA[TELANGANA HIGH COURT] 25-10-2025
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Sections 386, 420, 468, 471, 447, 427, 506 read with 34 — Quashing of FIR — allegations of forged documents, land mutation, and threats — Held, prima facie ingredients of the said sections are attracted — Pendency of civil suits not a ground to quash criminal proceedings — Investigation at nascent stage should not be stifled — Court should exercise power under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
India Law Library Docid # 2434624

(8) MUNIREDDY REDDY Vs. REGISTRAR OF CO OPERATIVE SOCIETIES AND OTHERS[KARNATAKA HIGH COURT] 23-10-2025
Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959 — Disqualification of Director — Surety for loan — Petitioner, a Director and President of a Co-operative Society, stood as surety for a loan. The principal borrower defaulted. The Petitioner sought to retire as surety unilaterally. The Society's Board passed a resolution allowing the Petitioner's retirement. Subsequently, the Petitioner was disqualified as a Director
India Law Library Docid # 2434542

(9) SMT. MEERA M.R Vs. SRI GANGADHARA[KARNATAKA HIGH COURT] 23-10-2025
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Order 1 Rule 10 and Section 151 — Impleading party — Will proceedings — Caveatable interest — A person claiming interest adverse to the testator, like claiming occupancy rights to the property subject to the Will, and who is not an heir by succession, cannot be impleaded as a party respondent to oppose the grant of Letter of Administration — Such a person does not
India Law Library Docid # 2434543

(10) V. PRADEEP AND ANOTHER Vs. STATE OF TELANGANA AND OTHERS[TELANGANA HIGH COURT] 23-10-2025
Constitution of India, 1950 — Article 14, 16, 21 — Regularization of service — Contract employees — Petitioner appointed as Junior Engineer (Electrical)/Contract Manager in 2011, having completed 13 years of service — Respondents rejecting regularization claim — Petitioner arguing appointment was legal, contravening conditions of service regulations, principles of natural justice, and constitutional
India Law Library Docid # 2434625

(11) METRRO WASTE HANDLING PVT. LTD. Vs. MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI[DELHI HIGH COURT] 21-10-2025
Contract Law - Concession Agreement — Scope of Work — A petitioner challenged a tender invitation (NIT) arguing it breached their existing Concession Agreement. The court considered whether the NIT scope of work for collecting and transporting "mixed waste (under foul condition)" overlapped with the petitioner's
India Law Library Docid # 2434252

(12) INHABITANTS OF BLOCK HARWAN Vs. UT OF J&K AND OTHERS[JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH HIGH COURT AT SRINAGAR] 17-10-2025
Panchayati Raj Act, 1989 and Control of Building Operations Act, 1988 — Jurisdiction — Interpretation of Government Orders — Areas under jurisdiction of LCMA excluded from Panchayati Raj Act for building permissions — Held, Government Order dated 01.04.2022 clearly states that Government Order No. 11-RD&PR of 2022 dated 22.01.2022 (under Panchayati Raj Act) is not applicable in areas falling under the
India Law Library Docid # 2434067

(13) ARSHAD AHMED Vs. UT OF J&K AND OTHERS[JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH HIGH COURT (JAMMU BENCH)] 17-10-2025
Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO Act) — Sections 3 and 4 — Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Sections 366, 376 and 109 — Bail — Presumption of culpability under Section 29 of POCSO Act is rebuttable and not absolute — Prosecution needs to establish foundational facts before invoking presumption — Burden shifts to accused to rebut presumption — Accused is
India Law Library Docid # 2434096

(14) UNION OF INDIA Vs. M/S D. KHOSLA AND CO.[JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH HIGH COURT (JAMMU BENCH)] 17-10-2025
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 — Order 47, Rule 1 — Review of judgments — Grounds for review — Scope of review petition is limited and not an appeal in disguise — permissible grounds include discovery of new evidence, error apparent on face of record, or any other sufficient reason.
India Law Library Docid # 2434097

(15) PARDEEP DUBEY Vs. UNION TERRITORY OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND OTHERS[JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH HIGH COURT (JAMMU BENCH)] 17-10-2025
Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1988 — Detention order — Challenge based on procedural lapses, illegible documents, non-consideration of representation, delay in decision, and lack of application of mind — Detenu under illegal detention pursuant to an order based on two FIRs that resulted in bail due to procedural lapses — Grounds of detention solely
India Law Library Docid # 2434098

(16) ABDUL QAYOOM Vs. UNION TERRITORY OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND OTHERS[JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH HIGH COURT (JAMMU BENCH)] 17-10-2025
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 482 — Inherent powers of High Court — Quashing of FIR — Allegations of mala fide intent and abuse of process — FIR registered due to civil dispute and personal vendetta — Court must apply circumspection in exercising inherent powers.
India Law Library Docid # 2434095

(17) M/S B S ENVIRO N INFRACON PRIVATE LIMITED Vs. VIJ CONTRACTS PVT. LTD.[DELHI HIGH COURT] 17-10-2025
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Section 96 — Appeal — Commercial Courts Act, 2015 — Section 13 — Assailing judgment and decree dismissing suit for recovery — Issue pertains to whether a document constituted full and final settlement of claims up to a certain date.
India Law Library Docid # 2434207

(18) KUNDAN SINGH NEGI Vs. STATE[DELHI HIGH COURT] 17-10-2025
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 374(2) — Appeal against conviction — Rape, Hurt, Wrongful Confinement, Criminal Intimidation — Prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt — Appreciation of evidence — Conduct of prosecutrix before and after alleged incident — Conduct of prosecutrix indicating consensual relationship which turned sour — Acquittal. (Paras
India Law Library Docid # 2434208

(19) MOHINDER KUMAR VERMA Vs. VINOD RAJORIA[DELHI HIGH COURT] 17-10-2025
Agreement to Sell — Forfeiture of advance payment — Absence of forfeiture clause — Advance payment as part of purchase price — Cannot be summarily forfeited unless contract clearly characterises it as earnest/security — Buyer's statutory protection under Section 55(6)(b) of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 — Refund of advance with interest and statutory charge — Equity and conduct of parties
India Law Library Docid # 2434209

(20) SANJEEV CHADHA Vs. D.P.SACHDEVA AND OTHERS[DELHI HIGH COURT] 17-10-2025
Probate and Administration — Limitation — No specific period of limitation for grant of probate or letters of administration — Residuary provision of Article 137 of Limitation Act, 1963 applies (3 years) — Right to apply accrues when necessary, not necessarily within 3 years of death — It is a continuous right exercisable anytime after death as long as the right survives.
India Law Library Docid # 2434210