ive
User not Logged..
India's Biggest Headnotes Library over 53.69 Lakhs Headnotes
    Free Artificial Intelligence Drafting  

    Free Artificial Intelligence Case Analyzer  

   AI Submission Generator   

Latest Cases

(101) BHAJI DEVI AND OTHERS Vs. KRISHAN LAL AND OTHERS[HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 13-10-2025
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 482 (formerly BNSS Section 528) — Inherent powers of High Court — When exercisable — High Court can intervene under Section 482 when there is a grave miscarriage of justice, abuse of process of court, or required statutory procedure not complied with, even if revision is barred under Section 397(3) — Power to be exercised sparingly and cautiously, not as
India Law Library Docid # 2434036

(102) DALEEP KUMAR AND OTHERS Vs. UT OF J&K AND OTHERS[JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH HIGH COURT (JAMMU BENCH)] 13-10-2025
Constitution of Jammu and Kashmir, 2009 — Practice and Procedure — Writ Petition — Maintainability — Challenge to lease deed — Disputed questions of fact involved — Cannot be decided in writ jurisdiction — Petitioners relegated to Civil Court.
India Law Library Docid # 2434075

(103) FIVEBRO WATER SERVICES PVT LTD AND ANOTHER Vs. BIJAY MURMURIA AND OTHERS[GUJARAT HIGH COURT] 13-10-2025
Constitution of India, Article 226 and 227 — Writ Jurisdiction — Alternative Remedy — High Court's power under Article 226 is wide but discretionary and generally refrains from entertaining petitions if an efficacious alternative remedy exists, except in exceptional circumstances like violation of natural justice, infringement of fundamental rights, lack of jurisdiction, or challenge to vires of a
India Law Library Docid # 2434192

(104) TITHI CHANDRAJIT SHAH Vs. RAJENDRABHAI ALIAS SAMIRBHAI NATVARLAL SHAH AND OTHERS[GUJARAT HIGH COURT] 13-10-2025
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Section 34(3) and 31(5) — Setting aside of arbitral award — Limitation — Period of limitation for filing an application to set aside an arbitral award commences from the date a signed copy of the award is delivered to the party making the application — Delivery of a signed copy is a substantive requirement, not a mere formality — General Power of Attorney
India Law Library Docid # 2434193

(105) DEVANGI Vs. BHAVIK ROHITBHAI PANDYA AND OTHERS[GUJARAT HIGH COURT] 13-10-2025
Family Courts Act, 1984 — Section 7(1)(a) and (c) — Jurisdiction of Family Court — A suit for recovery of 'stridhan' (a wife's property) falls within the jurisdiction of the Family Court as it relates to the property of parties to a marriage.
India Law Library Docid # 2434194

(106) SUTHAR NYALCHAND MOHANJI AND ANOTHER Vs. STATE OF GUJARAT AND OTHERS[GUJARAT HIGH COURT] 13-10-2025
Gujarat Land Revenue Code, 1960 — Section 79(A) — Gujarat Land Revenue Rules — Breach of Condition — Sale of Land Without Prior Permission — Land vested in State Government — Previous proceedings confirmed vesting by Deputy Collector and Collector — Gujarat Revenue Tribunal set aside orders and directed conversion to old tenure on payment of premium — Held, conversion to old tenure
India Law Library Docid # 2434195

(107) RAJIA @ SABBO Vs. STATE GOVT. OF NCT DELHI[DELHI HIGH COURT] 13-10-2025
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — Sections 430, 528 — Suspension of sentence pending appeal — Appellant, a woman convicted under Sections 302, 201, 120B IPC, had undergone significant incarceration, was mother of minors, and had aged parents — Court considered period of incarceration, nature of appeal, appellant's conduct in jail, and care of her young child — Sentence suspended subject to
India Law Library Docid # 2434204

(108) M/S SURGE INDUSTRIES LTD AND OTHERS Vs. KAMAL GUPTA AND ANOTHER[DELHI HIGH COURT] 13-10-2025
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Order 37 Rule 3(6)(b) — Conditional leave to defend — Non-compliance by defendant — Court has no discretion to grant extension of time or waive pre-condition.
India Law Library Docid # 2434205

(109) SABU TRADE PRIVATE LIMITED Vs. RAJKUMAR SABU AND ANOTHER[DELHI HIGH COURT] 13-10-2025
Trade Marks Act, 1999 — Section 28(1) and 29 — Infringement — Prior use — Registration of a trade mark is prima facie evidence of its validity, and the onus to prove invalidity lies on the challenger — While registration grants rights, these are subject to the rights of prior users under Section 34.
India Law Library Docid # 2434217

(110) STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LIMITED Vs. BRITISH MARINE PLC[DELHI HIGH COURT] 13-10-2025
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Section 34 — Setting aside of arbitral award — Challenge to appointment of arbitrators — Issue conflict doctrine — Arbitrator having previously decided a similar issue involving one of the parties does not automatically disqualify them unless it's shown they cannot approach the issue with an open mind or were partial in the earlier arbitration — Mere presence-based
India Law Library Docid # 2434218

(111) BALAJI Vs. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA[BOMBAY HIGH COURT (AURANGABAD BENCH)] 13-10-2025
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 376(2)(i) and 376(3) — Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 — Sections 4, 6, and 42 — Rape of minor — Conviction under deleted section — Error in charge framing — Charge under Section 376(2)(i) of IPC was framed despite its deletion prior to the offense and charge framing. However, the evidence on record substantiated an offense under Section
India Law Library Docid # 2434382

(112) SHRI SAGAR @ MANISH SHAILESH BELAMKAR Vs. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS[BOMBAY HIGH COURT (CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR)] 13-10-2025
Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981 — Section 3 — Detention Order — Challenge to — Grounds for detention — Awareness of custody, real possibility of release on bail, and likelihood of engaging in prejudicial activities upon release are essential conditions.
India Law Library Docid # 2434384

(113) MILIND RAJKUMAR WAGHOLIKAR (SHAH) Vs. SHANKAR RAMCHANDRA KIRVE AND OTHERS[BOMBAY HIGH COURT] 13-10-2025
Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 — Section 13(1)(i) — Landlord's bona fide requirement for constructing new building — Landlord pleaded requirement for constructing an ownership apartment scheme on an open plot, obtained sanctioned plans and commencement certificate, and had sufficient funds — Tenants contended it was not an open plot and there were no specific pleadings — Court held
India Law Library Docid # 2434515

(114) SHAFIQ ALI HAIDER Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA[BOMBAY HIGH COURT] 13-10-2025
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Sections 302, 201 — Murder and destruction of evidence — Bail application — Applicant sought bail in a case involving brutal murder and dismemberment of the body with the intention of destroying evidence. The prosecution relied on circumstantial evidence, including the applicant being the last person seen with the deceased, CCTV footage showing the applicant with a gunny bag, and the recovery of
India Law Library Docid # 2434519

(115) SRI C.P. SELVARAJ Vs. SRI K.M. RAJENDRAN[KARNATAKA HIGH COURT] 13-10-2025
Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957 — Section 33, 34, 35 — Admissibility of insufficient stamp duty documents — A court can recall an order admitting an instrument in evidence if it was insufficiently stamped, even if admitted without objection and marked as an exhibit, provided there was no prior “judicial determination” of its admissibility and stamp duty sufficiency. The court can exercise inherent powers
India Law Library Docid # 2434631

(116) COMMANDANT BENGAL ENGINEERING GROUP & CENTRE ROORKEE Vs. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND[UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT] 13-10-2025
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 133 — Removal of nuisance — Jurisdiction of Sub-Divisional Magistrate — Dispute concerning a pathway on defence land — Court found that the land in question, Khasra No.710, was recorded as a public pathway ("gauhar raasta") and had been in longstanding public use. The Sub-Divisional Magistrate acted within jurisdiction under Section 133 Cr.P.C. to
India Law Library Docid # 2434688

(117) ANJU AND ANOTHER Vs. RINKU DAHIYA[DELHI HIGH COURT] 11-10-2025
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 — Section 24 — Interim Maintenance — Both spouses equally qualified and earning — Wife earning Rs. 2.5 lakhs per month, husband earning USD 7134 (approx. Rs. 5.6 lakhs by simple exchange, Rs. 1.65 lakhs by PPP) per month — Wife not entitled to maintenance as she is not financially handicapped and can litigate — Object of
India Law Library Docid # 2434702

(118) ANIRUDH DAWAR AND OTHERS Vs. STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR[DELHI HIGH COURT] 10-10-2025
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita — Section 528 — Quashing of FIR — Settlement between parties — Marriage dispute — FIR registered under Sections 498A/406/377/34 IPC — Parties amicably resolved their disputes, entered into a settlement agreement, and obtained a divorce — Respondent No. 2 (complainant) confirmed settlement and had no objection to quashing the FIR — State also had no objection — Held, in view of settlement and to secure ends of justice, FIR and
India Law Library Docid # 2433775

(119) M/S AMD ESTATES AND DEVELOPERS PVT LTD. Vs. M/S VSR INFRATECH PVT LTD[DELHI HIGH COURT] 10-10-2025
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Section 9 — Interim relief — Principles for grant — Prima facie case, balance of convenience, and irreparable injury — Court's role is to preserve subject matter of dispute and ensure award is not infructuous, not to
India Law Library Docid # 2433779

(120) KOMAL GARG (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH HER LRS. Vs. MOHIT ARORA AND OTHERS[DELHI HIGH COURT] 10-10-2025
Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 — Section 14(1)(e) — Eviction petition — Bona fide need of landlord — Requirement for storing business equipment/tools due to space crunch — Landlord’s need is genuine and sincere, not whimsical or fanciful.
India Law Library Docid # 2433781