ive
User not Logged..
India's Biggest Headnotes Library over 53.69 Lakhs Headnotes
    Free Artificial Intelligence Drafting  

    Free Artificial Intelligence Case Analyzer  

   AI Submission Generator   

Latest Cases

(341) LEGAL HEIRS OF PARMAR RAIJIBHAI KODARJI AND OTHERS Vs. STATE OF GUJARAT AND OTHERS[GUJARAT HIGH COURT] 26-09-2025
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 — Section 4, 6, 9, 11, 18 — Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Section 96 — Appeal against judgment and award of Reference Court regarding land compensation — Appellant claimants seeking enhancement of compensation — Reference Court awarded additional Rs.80/- per square meter — Notification under Section 4 issued on 16.10.2004, Declaration under Section 6 on
India Law Library Docid # 2434165

(342) UMESH PRAVINBHAI MAKWANA AND OTHERS Vs. STATE OF GUJARAT AND ANOTHER[GUJARAT HIGH COURT] 26-09-2025
Gujarat Town Planning and Urban Development Act, 1976, Section 68 and Rule 33 of Gujarat Town Planning and Urban Development Rules, 1979 — Gujarat Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1973, Section 17 — Eviction notices under Town Planning Act — Protection under Slums Act — Conflict of provisions — Protection under Section 17 of Slums Act applies only to tenants and not per se to owners
India Law Library Docid # 2434166

(343) VISHNUJI SHANKARJI THAKOR Vs. STATE OF GUJARAT[GUJARAT HIGH COURT] 26-09-2025
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 379 — Theft — Ingredients not proved — No evidence of dishonest intention to take movable property, property being taken out of possession of another, or property being moved — Materials found at the location, not removed — Accused apprehended away from the scene, not attempting to flee with others.
India Law Library Docid # 2434168

(344) SHAILI PRANAV SHAH Vs. STATE OF GUJARAT[GUJARAT HIGH COURT] 26-09-2025
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — Section 482 — Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 438 — Anticipatory Bail — Economic Offences — Held, anticipatory bail is an extraordinary remedy and should be exercised sparingly, especially in serious economic offences involving large-scale fraud or complex financial crimes. Refusal to grant anticipatory bail in such cases does not violate Article 21 of the
India Law Library Docid # 2434169

(345) SHRI RAMDEV COTSPIN PARTNERSHIP FIRM Vs. PACIFIC COTSPIN LTD. (NOW KNOWN AS SILVERTON SPINEERS LTD) AND OTHERS[BOMBAY HIGH COURT (NAGPUR BENCH)] 26-09-2025
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 — Section 138 — Dishonour of cheque — Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 — Section 96 — Interim Moratorium — Proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act are of a penal nature, aimed at upholding commercial integrity, not merely recovery — A moratorium imposed under the IBC does not shield individuals (Directors) from
India Law Library Docid # 2434503

(346) MIRZA ASLAM BEIGH RASHID BEIGH AND OTHERS Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS[BOMBAY HIGH COURT (NAGPUR BENCH)] 26-09-2025
Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO Act) — Sections 4(1), 8, 9, 10, 11 of Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006, Section 64(1) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 — Offences against minor girl — Quashing FIR — Applicant argued for quashing FIR due to love affair and subsequent marriage with victim, who was a minor at the time of sexual relationship and marriage, and has since
India Law Library Docid # 2434504

(347) MANU @ MOHINDER MADHURESH Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA[BOMBAY HIGH COURT] 26-09-2025
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Sections 302 and 376 — Appeal against conviction and sentence for murder and rape — Court confirmed conviction for murder based on a complete chain of circumstantial evidence including motive, accused's anger over a broken love affair, threats made, harassment of the deceased, deceased being alone at home, accused's suspicious movements, his absconding, extra-judicial confession and
India Law Library Docid # 2434488

(348) JAIPAKASH KRISHNASWAMY NAIDU AND OTHERS Vs. M/S. NORTHERN OPERATING SERVICES PVT. LTD[KARNATAKA HIGH COURT] 26-09-2025
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Section 37(1)(c) — Appeal against judgment setting aside arbitral award — Employee seeking modification of arbitral award to grant monetary reliefs not awarded by arbitrator or court — Held, Section 37 does not empower courts to modify or grant claims not awarded by arbitrator. Courts setting aside an award can only allow parties to recommence arbitration if desired.
India Law Library Docid # 2434553

(349) VEERABHADRAPPA AND OTHERS Vs. CHANNAPPA GOWDA D DEAD BY LR'S AND OTHERS[KARNATAKA HIGH COURT] 26-09-2025
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Section 100 — Second Appeal — Substantial Question of Law — Courts below erred in drawing final decree proceeding as per joint memo when Commissioner refused partition for a certain extent of land due to non-inclusion during demarcation, and issues regarding entitlement to partition based on survey demarcation versus actual possession.
India Law Library Docid # 2434554

(350) NARA SURYANARAYANA REDDY Vs. INITIATING OFFICER, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, (BENAMI PROHIBITION)[KARNATAKA HIGH COURT (DHARWAD BENCH)] 26-09-2025
Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988 — Section 24(1), 24(2), and 24(2A) — Notice and attachment of property — Requirement to call upon beneficial owner to reply — Notice issued to Benamidar under Section 24(1) was marked to the beneficial owner under Section 24(2) — Beneficial owner argued that the notice did not specifically call upon them to reply, violating principles of natural justice — Revenue argued that Section 24(2A) allows the beneficial owner to reply if
India Law Library Docid # 2434558

(351) SHANKAR Vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND OTHERS[KARNATAKA HIGH COURT (DHARWAD BENCH)] 26-09-2025
Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959 — Section 2(e-1-a) and 2(e-2-1); Section 29E; Rule 14AF of Karnataka Co-operative Societies Rules, 1960 — Delegate of Co-operative Society — Director nominated or co-opted can be a delegate. The definition of 'Director' includes nominated or co-opted members, and thus a nominated or co-opted director is eligible to be appointed as a delegate.
India Law Library Docid # 2434559

(352) VISHWANATH Vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA[KARNATAKA HIGH COURT (DHARWAD BENCH)] 26-09-2025
Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 — Section 21(1) and (2) — Appointment of Inspectors — Notification requirement upon transfer — A notification appointing an Inspector under Section 21(1) of the Act is for the initial appointment and for assigning areas. A subsequent transfer of an Inspector to a different area does not require a fresh notification under Section 21(1); such transfers fall under the ambit of
India Law Library Docid # 2434560

(353) SAYAWWA AND OTHERS Vs. MALLAPPA SIDRAMAPPA NEMAGOUDAR AND OTHERS[KARNATAKA HIGH COURT (KALABURAGI BENCH)] 26-09-2025
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — Section 147 — Compulsory Third Party Insurance — Tractor-trailer combination as a single unit for insurance purposes — If the trailer is insured, the insurance company is liable for third-party claims arising from its use, even if the tractor is not insured — The trailer, when attached to a tractor, is considered part of the motor vehicle and its insurance covers third-party risks.
India Law Library Docid # 2434562

(354) NARNE ESTATES PRIVATE LTD. Vs. NELLUTLA KUMMARI SHIVA RAJU AND OTHERS[TELANGANA HIGH COURT] 26-09-2025
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Order 18, Rule 17 — Power to recall and examine witness — This rule is intended to enable the Court to clarify any issue or doubt by recalling a witness, either on its own or on a party's application, so that the Court can ask questions and elicit answers — It is not meant for parties to recall a witness for further examination or to fill up lacunae in their evidence — The stage of the suit and the
India Law Library Docid # 2434563

(355) P. DHEERAJ RANGA REDDY Vs. STATE OF TELANGANA[TELANGANA HIGH COURT] 26-09-2025
Registration Act, 1908 — Rule 26(i)(k) and Rule 243 of Telangana Rules — Cancellation of Sale Deeds — Unilateral cancellation without notice and without court order is illegal and arbitrary — Registration authorities must follow due process and principles of natural justice — Properties not notified as prohibited under Section 22-A of
India Law Library Docid # 2434564

(356) MR. VUNUKONDA PRAKASH RAO AND OTHERS Vs. VUNUKONDA MALLESHAM AND OTHERS[TELANGANA HIGH COURT] 26-09-2025
Administrators General Act, 1963 — Section 29 — Grant of Certificate — Scope — Administrator General can grant certificate for assets not exceeding Rs. 10 lakhs. The value of the subject property in this case exceeded this limit at the time of the gift deed execution, rendering the Administrator General's action without jurisdiction.
India Law Library Docid # 2434565

(357) STATE OF TELANGANA AND OTHERS Vs. M. ANTHAMMA[TELANGANA HIGH COURT] 26-09-2025
Land Revenue Act, 1317 Fasli (Telangana Land Revenue Act) — Section 166-B — Cancellation of assignment — Assignment of land to a minor — Respondent was assigned land in 1961 when a minor. Her father passed away in 1960 leaving her as legal heir. She was in continuous possession and cultivation of the land, and her name was mutated in revenue records, with Pattadar Pass Book and Title Deeds issued. — Cancellation proceedings initiated in 1998, after more than three decades, on grounds of
India Law Library Docid # 2434566

(358) LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER & REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER PEDDAPALLI Vs. M. ANJAIAH AND OTHERS[TELANGANA HIGH COURT] 26-09-2025
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 — Section 54 — Appeal against enhanced compensation — Reference Court's enhanced compensation upheld — Sale deeds of adjacent lands relied upon for comparison were genuine and representative — LAO's reliance on distant agricultural lands was not appropriate.
India Law Library Docid # 2434567

(359) L AND T INFRA INVESTMENT PARTNERS ADVISORY PRIVATE LIMITED Vs. BHORUKA POWER CORPORATION LIMITED[KARNATAKA HIGH COURT] 26-09-2025
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Section 5 — Extent of judicial intervention — Civil suits to restrain domestic arbitration proceedings are generally barred — Civil courts' jurisdiction is limited to intervening only as expressly provided in Part I of the Act — Section 5 bars interference in arbitral proceedings governed by Part I, except as specified — This principle is based on the object of minimizing
India Law Library Docid # 2434634

(360) RAHUL CHAUDHARY Vs. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND AND ANOTHER[UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT] 26-09-2025
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 — Sections 9-A, 25-A, 26, 29 — Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Sections 420, 467 — Framing of charges — Scope of interference at this stage — Court's function is limited to prima facie examination of whether there exists a strong suspicion or sufficient ground to believe that the accused may have committed the alleged offence.
India Law Library Docid # 2434671