ive
User not Logged..
India's Biggest Headnotes Library over 53.69 Lakhs Headnotes
    Free Artificial Intelligence Drafting  

    Free Artificial Intelligence Case Analyzer  

   AI Submission Generator   

Latest Cases

(641) SMT UMA DEVI Vs. SATULA DEVI AND OTHERS[DELHI HIGH COURT] 16-09-2025
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) — Order VII Rule 11 — Rejection of Plaint — Scope of powers — A plaint must be read comprehensively and holistically; rejection at the threshold under Order VII Rule 11 is permissible only if the requirements of the rule are strictly met — A Court is not entitled to reject a plaint in part — The pendency of a parallel Probate Petition concerning a Will that is challenged in the Civil Suit may be a
India Law Library Docid # 2434285

(642) PRAJAKTA SIDDHESH PARALKAR Vs. SIDDHESH PARALKAR[BOMBAY HIGH COURT] 16-09-2025
Family Court Act, 1984 — Sections 19, 25, 27 — Constitution of India, 1950 — Article 227 — Maintenance application wherein wife sought deposit of sale proceeds of a flat — High Court directing husband to deposit half of sale consideration after loan deduction — Husband's challenge dismissed by review and Supreme Court — Conduct of husband in misleading court and delaying compliance — Court emphasizing duty of
India Law Library Docid # 2434366

(643) PRAMOD @ PINTYA Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA[BOMBAY HIGH COURT (NAGPUR BENCH)] 16-09-2025
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 302 — Murder — Homicidal death — Post-mortem report indicating multiple chop wounds on the head caused by an axe, with medical opinion confirming death due to head injury and possibility of injuries being caused by the seized axe — Defense not disputing homicidal death — Point No. 1
India Law Library Docid # 2434500

(644) ASHISH Vs. SMT. MOHINI AND OTHERS[BOMBAY HIGH COURT (NAGPUR BENCH)] 16-09-2025
Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 — Section 2(a), 2(f), 2(s), 3, 12, 17 — Definition of 'aggrieved person', 'domestic relationship', 'shared household', 'economic abuse' — Right to reside in shared household — Applicability of Act to past relationships — The Act applies to women who are or have been in a domestic relationship and who allege domestic violence. This includes women who
India Law Library Docid # 2434501

(645) HARIBHAU DNYANDEV CHEMTE Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER[BOMBAY HIGH COURT] 16-09-2025
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 — Sections 246, 318, 337, 339, 340 — Anticipatory Bail Application — Jurisdiction of Police Station — FIR lodged for preparing a forged order intended to affect criminal proceedings already initiated against the applicant — Held, the police station where the original FIR was registered has jurisdiction to investigate the FIR concerning the forged order, even if the forged order was produced
India Law Library Docid # 2434484

(646) ROMELL HOUSING LLP AND OTHERS Vs. SAMEER SALIM SHAIKH AND OTHERS[BOMBAY HIGH COURT] 16-09-2025
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 145 — Dispute concerning immovable property — Breach of peace — Object of Section 145 is to prevent breaches of peace by identifying and protecting the party in actual possession, not to decide ownership or title — This is a summary and preventive proceeding, provisional in effect,
India Law Library Docid # 2434485

(647) SANJEEV RANA AND ANOTHER Vs. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND[UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT] 16-09-2025
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Sections 302, 201, 120B read with Section 34 — Murder and destruction of evidence — Circumstantial evidence — Case based on circumstantial evidence must establish a complete chain of events pointing solely to the guilt of the accused — Factors to consider include motive, last seen theory, recovery of articles, and condition of the body — If the chain is not complete or
India Law Library Docid # 2434600

(648) KANCHAN SETIYA Vs. NITIN SETIYA[UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT] 16-09-2025
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 — Section 13 (1) (i-a) — Divorce — Cruelty — Allegations of harassment, torture, assault for dowry, picking quarrels, and expelling from matrimonial home — Respondent denied allegations of cruelty and claimed appellant insisted on staying in parental home and became cruel — Court found general allegations of cruelty unsubstantiated by evidence — False allegations of
India Law Library Docid # 2434601

(649) M/S KUMAON ROSIN INDUSTRIES Vs. COMMISSIONER, STATE GOODS AND SERVICES TAX AND ANOTHER[UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT] 16-09-2025
Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 — Section 169 — Mode of service of notice — Registration cancelled — Assessee not expected to monitor GST portal indefinitely — Proper service required through valid alternative modes.
India Law Library Docid # 2434602

(650) MS. XXXX Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND OTHERS[RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT] 15-09-2025
Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971 — Section 3 and 5 and Rule 3A(a)(i) of MTP Rules, 2003 — Termination of pregnancy beyond 24 weeks — Allowed only if Medical Board diagnoses substantial foetal abnormalities or termination is necessary to save life of pregnant woman or her grave mental/physical health injury — Medical Board opined that termination of 30-week pregnancy would adversely affect mother and fetus,
India Law Library Docid # 2432692

(651) DAL SINGH Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN[RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT] 15-09-2025
Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — Section 430(2) — Suspension of Sentence — Bail pending appeal — Applicant convicted for life imprisonment — Submitted that approximately 10 years of sentence has been undergone and no likelihood of early hearing of appeal — Relied on Supreme Court directions in Sonadhar v. State of Chhattisgarh and Saudan Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh — Held that High Courts should
India Law Library Docid # 2432693

(652) SRI H.S. GAURAV AND OTHERS Vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA AND OTHERS[KARNATAKA HIGH COURT] 15-09-2025
Constitution of India, 1950 — Article 226 — Writ of Mandamus — Judicial review of State decision — Petitioners challenged the State's decision to invite an individual as Chief Guest for a religious festival inauguration — Held, the decision was a policy matter of the State and not subject to judicial review on the grounds of offending religious sentiments.
India Law Library Docid # 2432735

(653) PUJYAM SESHANJANEYA RAJESH AND ANOTHER Vs. NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED AND OTHERS[ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT] 15-09-2025
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — Sections 166, 163A — Motor Accident Claim — Liability of Insurer — Burden of Proof — Driving License — Where an Insurance Company alleges that the driver of the offending vehicle did not possess a valid driving license, the burden is on the Insurance Company to prove this fact with cogent evidence — Mere denial or a weak report without examination of the concerned officer or
India Law Library Docid # 2432995

(654) TOYOTA KIRLOSKAR MOTOR PVT. LTD. Vs. L. SUNI REDDY AND OTHERS[ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT] 15-09-2025
Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Sections 14, 16, 18, 20, 29A — Consumer Protection Act, 2019 — Sections 58, 64, 107 — National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) — Composition of Benches — Validity of order passed by a single member — Held, under Section 58(2) and 64 of the New Act, the President of NCDRC can constitute a bench with one or more members, and an order is not invalid
India Law Library Docid # 2432996

(655) NELLORE PROGRESSIVE UNION Vs. TOWN HALL TRUST BOARD AND OTHERS[ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT] 15-09-2025
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Order 40 Rule 1 — Appointment of Receiver — Principles governing — 'Panch Sadachar' as enunciated in T. Krishnaswamy Chetty v. C. Thangavelu Chetty — Trial Court must consider adverse and conflicting claims, emergency or danger, likelihood of serious damage, plaintiff's excellent chance of success, and absence of laches, delay, or acquiescence by applicant — Appointment of receiver is an equitable remedy and not to be granted for mere asking — Trial court order
India Law Library Docid # 2432997

(656) DR. A.NEELALOHITHADASAN NADAR Vs. STATE OF KERALA[KERALA HIGH COURT] 15-09-2025
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 354 — Outraging modesty of a woman — Evidence Act, 1872 — Section 8, 60 — Test for sterling witness — Conviction solely on victim's testimony requires rigorous scrutiny — Testimony must be of sterling quality and unassailable — Absence of corroboration where victim's testimony has flaws and lacunae can lead to acquittal.
India Law Library Docid # 2433003

(657) APPUKUTTAN Vs. STATE OF KERALA[KERALA HIGH COURT] 15-09-2025
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 — Section 394 — Abatement of appeals — Death of appellant — Appeal against conviction and sentence of imprisonment and fine — Where near relatives do not wish to prosecute the appeal and accept the sentence of fine, the appeal shall be dismissed as abated.
India Law Library Docid # 2433004

(658) OM NARAYAN VERMA AND OTHERS Vs. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH[CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT] 15-09-2025
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 482 — Quashing of proceedings — Abuse of process of law — Essential ingredients of Section 201 IPC (Causing disappearance of evidence of offence) — Prosecution failed to establish that death was homicidal in nature — DNA report only confirmed skeleton belonged to deceased but not the cause of death — Investigating Officer admitted doctor did not opine on cause of death — Circumstantial evidence of "last seen" is weak evidence and cannot form sole
India Law Library Docid # 2433202

(659) SATYENDRA KUMAR Vs. UNION OF INDIA[ORISSA HIGH COURT] 15-09-2025
Central Industrial Security Force Rules, 2001 — Rule 34, Rule 36, Rule 55 — Disciplinary action — Penalty — Compulsory retirement — Disproportionate penalty — Charge of disobedience for not attending counselling — Imposition of major penalty like compulsory retirement or reduction in pay by multiple stages for failing to attend counselling, which was advisory in nature, is disproportionate. Minor penalty like
India Law Library Docid # 2433154

(660) AMARESH SARKAR Vs. CUTTACK DURGABARI SAMITY, REPRESENTED THROUGH ITS SECRETARY GAUTAM MUKHERJI AND OTHERS[ORISSA HIGH COURT] 15-09-2025
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Section 151 and Order 18 Rule 3 — Consolidation of suits for trial — Analogous trial does not legally amount to consolidation — Suits maintain their independent identities — Allows for rebuttal evidence, subject to court's satisfaction — Trial court rightly allowed one party to adduce further evidence in the other suit after closure of initial evidence, considering distinct issues and prayers.
India Law Library Docid # 2433155