ive
User not Logged..
India's Biggest Headnotes Library over 53.69 Lakhs Headnotes
    Free Artificial Intelligence Drafting  

    Free Artificial Intelligence Case Analyzer  

   AI Submission Generator   

Latest Cases

(221) KALIM ISUB SHAIKH Vs. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 07-10-2025
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 — Sections 109, 118(1), 118(2), 115(2), 351(3), 352, 3(5) — Bail — Appellant arrested for offences under the said sections — High Court rejected bail application — Supreme Court, considering totality of circumstances, including appellant's incarceration for over 7 months, found grounds for interference — Bail granted on terms fixed by Trial Court.
India Law Library Docid # 2434406

(222) SADDAM Vs. STATE OF U.P.[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 07-10-2025
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 439 — Grant of bail — Petitioner in custody for approximately 6½ years and trial not concluded — Only 7 out of 21 witnesses examined — Trial expected to take further time — Supreme Court granted bail without commenting on merits, considering the prolonged period of
India Law Library Docid # 2434407

(223) HARI KANT SHARMA AND OTHERS Vs. VERSUS BOARD OF REVENUE AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 07-10-2025
Succession Law — Inheritance of property — Dispute over ownership and possession — Claim of adoption — Onus of proof — Sagar Dutt claimed adoption by Ram Swarup and ownership of specific land — Controverted by stepbrothers — Lack of cogent evidence to prove adoption or that Ram Swarup gave his entire share to
India Law Library Docid # 2434408

(224) KHUSHDEEP SINGH Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 07-10-2025
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Sections 438, 439 — Anticipatory Bail — Grant of — Appeal against High Court's rejection — Appellant sought anticipatory bail due to apprehension of arrest in FIR under various sections of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 — His anticipatory bail application was rejected by the Additional
India Law Library Docid # 2434429

(225) PRAKASH JAT Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 07-10-2025
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 – Sections 8 and 15 – Offence of possessing a narcotic drug.Bail/Suspension of sentence – Appeal pending before High Court – Appellant in custody for over 8 years, which is 2/3rd of the sentence – High Court rejected bail/suspension of sentence – Supreme Court granted
India Law Library Docid # 2434435

(226) RAJU MAJUMDAR Vs. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 07-10-2025
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 — Section 37 — Offences relating to commercial quantity — Bail — Bar under Section 37 not applicable when quantity recovered is less than commercial quantity — Appellant in jail for over 1 year 6 months pending trial — Appellant made out a case for bail.
India Law Library Docid # 2434438

(227) JAGDISH Vs. PRAKASH AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 07-10-2025
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — Compensation for injuries — Enhancement — Appellant suffered 50% disability due to accident, resulting in loss of income — High Court awarded compensation of ₹7,36,200/- — Supreme Court enhanced lumpsum compensation to ₹12,00,000/- considering the permanent disability, loss of future income, and potential need for ongoing medical aid.
India Law Library Docid # 2434440

(228) TAPASH DATTA ETC. Vs. THE STATE OF TRIPURA[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 07-10-2025
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 353 and 447 read with Section 34 — Conviction upheld but sentence reduced — Appellants convicted for offenses under Sections 353 (assault or criminal force to deter public servant from discharge of his duty) and 447 (criminal trespass) read with Section 34 (common intention) of the IPC
India Law Library Docid # 2434442

(229) ALL INDIA JUDGES ASSOCIATION AND OTHERS Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 07-10-2025
Civil Procedure — Intervention — Applications for intervention allowed — Parties representing judges initially recruited as Civil Judges and those directly recruited as District Judges allowed to intervene in proceedings concerning career progression.
India Law Library Docid # 2434476

(230) PREM AGGARWAL Vs. MOHAN SINGH AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 07-10-2025
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 — Order 2 Rule 2 — Bar to further suit — First suit for injunction based on potential dispossession was withdrawn without reservation, second suit for specific performance based on the same cause of action (advertisement for sale) was filed — Held, both suits were based on the same cause of action.
India Law Library Docid # 2434701

(231) NAZIM AND OTHERS Vs. THE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 06-10-2025
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Sections 154, 11 — First Information Report (FIR) — Omission of names — Significant omission of names of accused in FIR, despite complainant's familiarity with them, raises serious doubt about subsequent implication and suggests possibility of false implication — In cases based solely on circumstantial evidence, every circumstance must withstand rigorous scrutiny.
India Law Library Docid # 2433540

(232) P. RADHAKRISHNAN AND ANOTHER Vs. COCHIN DEVASWOM BOARD AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 06-10-2025
Constitution of India, 1950 — Writ Petition — Scope of enquiry — High Court exceeding the scope of writ petition by issuing directions for fixing license fee and conducting an inquiry by the Chief Vigilance Officer, without putting the appellants on notice. Such directions rendered the appellants worse off in their own writ petition,
India Law Library Docid # 2433541

(233) VINISHMA TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD. Vs. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH AND ANOTHER[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 06-10-2025
Constitution of India, 1950 — Article 14 and 19(1)(g) — Doctrine of Level Playing Field — Tender Conditions — Suppliers based outside the State excluded by a condition requiring past experience of supplying to Chhattisgarh government agencies — Supreme Court held this to be arbitrary and discriminatory, violating the right to equality and freedom of trade — The condition created an artificial barrier,
India Law Library Docid # 2433542

(234) VINISHMA TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD. Vs. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH AND ANOTHER[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 06-10-2025
Constitution of India, 1950 — Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) — Tender Conditions — Past Performance Restriction — A tender condition restricting bidders to those who supplied goods to the specific State Government in the past three years is arbitrary and discriminatory, violating the principles of equality and freedom of trade. Such a restriction creates an artificial barrier, excludes competent bidders, and curtails fundamental rights without just cause.
India Law Library Docid # 2433557

(235) STATE OF KARNATAKA AND OTHERS Vs. MINERAL ENTERPRISES PRIVATE LIMITED AND ANOTHER[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 06-10-2025
Interim Application seeking disbursement of sale proceeds from an escrow account regarding iron ore. The applicant, respondent No. 1, had sold iron ore amounting to approximately INR 125 crore and deposited it in the escrow account as per previous court directions. The applicant now seeks to utilize these funds.
India Law Library Docid # 2434258

(236) MAHADEVA Vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 06-10-2025
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 302 — Conviction for murder — Sentence — Life imprisonment — Supreme Court modifies sentence from imprisonment for remainder of natural life to simple life imprisonment, allowing eligibility for premature release.
India Law Library Docid # 2434267

(237) THE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH Vs. ANIL THAKUR[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 06-10-2025
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 376 (Rape) and Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 — Section 3(2)(v) — High Court rightly set aside Sessions Court's conviction and acquitted the accused — Reasons for acquittal included doubt about the accused being a minor, consensual
India Law Library Docid # 2434270

(238) ROHITASH RANWA Vs. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ANOTHER[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 06-10-2025
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Cognizable Offence — High Court wrongly quashed proceedings on the basis that the complaint did not disclose a cognizable offence — Supreme Court found that the complaint did disclose a cognizable offence — Impugned judgment of High Court set aside and appeal allowed — Proceedings to continue as per FIR.
India Law Library Docid # 2434272

(239) PRADEEP KUMAR Vs. STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 06-10-2025
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Bail — Long incarceration pending trial — Appellant incarcerated for over 3 years pending trial for offences with maximum sentence of 10 years — Trial nowhere near completion — Section 328 IPC may not be made out against appellant — Delay in trial and such circumstances,
India Law Library Docid # 2434313

(240) VICKY KUMAR Vs. THE STATE OF BIHAR AND ANOTHER[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 06-10-2025
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Interim bail order — Supreme Court confirming interim bail order granted earlier — Appellant cooperated with investigation and trial, did not threaten witnesses, and did not influence investigation — Appeal allowed with directions for continued cooperation and reporting to Investigating Officer — Power to cancel bail exists if investigation/trial is delayed due to appellant's conduct.
India Law Library Docid # 2434324