ive
User not Logged..
India's Biggest Headnotes Library over 53.69 Lakhs Headnotes
     Free Artificial Intelligence Case Analyzer  

   AI Submission Generator [on behalf of Appellant/Respondent]  

Latest Cases

(1) IN RE: THE WAQF AMENDMENT ACT, 2025 (1)[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 15-09-2025
Waqf Act, 1995 (as amended) — Challenge to constitutional validity of amendments — Petitioners contended that amendments are ultra vires the Constitution, violating fundamental rights including Articles 14, 15, 19, 21, 25, 26, 29, 30 and 300A. Respondents argued for legislative competence and presumption of validity of enactments. Court emphasized that statutes should only be declared
India Law Library Docid # 2432652

(2) ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER STATE BANK OF INDIA AND ANOTHER Vs. TANYA ENERGY ENTERPRISES THROUGH ITS MANAGING PARTNER SHRI ALLURI LAKSHMI NARASIMHA VARMA[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 15-09-2025
Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (SARFAESI Act) and Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993 (RDB Act) — One Time Settlement (OTS) Scheme 2020 — Rejection of borrower's OTS application — High Court's interference — Supreme Court's review — Clause 4(i) of OTS 2020 requiring upfront payment of 5% of OTS amount for
India Law Library Docid # 2432704

(3) KAILAS S/O BAJIRAO PAWAR Vs. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 15-09-2025
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 — Sections 8(c) read with 20(b)(ii)(C) — Prohibition — Evidence — Video recording — Admissibility of electronic evidence under Section 65B of Evidence Act — High Court erred in directing re-trial on the ground that video recording was not converted into legally admissible evidence due to not being played during witness deposition and lack of
India Law Library Docid # 2432705

(4) PARAMJEET SINGH Vs. STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 15-09-2025
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 420 — Cheating — Dishonest intention — For an offence of cheating, fraudulent or dishonest intention at the time of making a promise or representation must be shown, not merely a failure to keep a promise subsequently — Mere allegations of failure to provide a product with specific specifications or failure to replace faulty machines do not satisfy the test of dishonest
India Law Library Docid # 2432706

(5) ANNA WAMAN BHALERAO Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 12-09-2025
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Sections 420, 463, 465, 467, 468, 471, 474 read with Section 34 — Offences relating to cheating and forgery — Anticipatory bail — Rejection challenged — Appellants, public servants at the time, accused of certifying mutation entries based on forged documents — High Court rejected anticipatory bail — Supreme Court affirmed the High Court's decision.
India Law Library Docid # 2432639

(6) MAMMAN KHAN Vs. STATE OF HARYANA[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 12-09-2025
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Sections 218, 219, 220, 223 — Joinder of charges and trials — Joint trial is the norm when offences arise from the same transaction — Segregation of trial solely on the ground of an accused being a sitting MLA is legally unsustainable — Such segregation, when ordered suo motu without notice or application and without assessing prejudice or delay, violates principles of
India Law Library Docid # 2432640

(7) CONFEDERATION OF REAL ESTATE DEVELOPERS ASSOCIATION OF INDIA (CREDAI) Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 12-09-2025
Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 — Section 3(1) and 3(2)(v) — EIA Notification, 2006, Schedule, Items 8(a) and 8(b) — General Conditions (GC) — Applicability — Column 5 of Schedule — Literal interpretation — Scheme of Notification — Omissions in Column 5 for Items 8(a) and 8(b) indicated deliberate legislative intent for exclusion of GC — NGT misconstrued EIA Notification and
India Law Library Docid # 2432641

(8) ITC LIMITED Vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ANOTHER[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 12-09-2025
Legal Metrology Act, 2009 — Section 15 — Power of inspection, seizure, etc. — Mandatory compliance with Cr.P.C. provisions for search and seizure — Section 15(4) requires searches and seizures to be carried out in accordance with Cr.P.C. provisions — Sections 93 and 100 Cr.P.C. mandate need for search warrant and presence of independent witnesses, respectively — Failure to comply renders search
India Law Library Docid # 2432642

(9) MANSI BRAR FERNANDES Vs. SHUBHA SHARMA AND ANOTHER[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 12-09-2025
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 — Section 7 — Initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) — Homebuyers as Financial Creditors — Distinction between genuine homebuyers and speculative investors — Key factors for identification include nature of contract, buyback clauses, assured returns, stage of project, and intention to possess or profit — Assured returns and buyback options in
India Law Library Docid # 2432643

(10) RAJUL MANOJ SHAH ALIAS RAJESHWARI RASIKLAL SHETH Vs. KIRANBHAI SHAKRABHAI PATEL AND ANOTHER[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 12-09-2025
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Order 8 Rule 6A — Counter-claim — A counter-claim must be directed against the plaintiff and cannot be exclusively against a co-defendant. The purpose of a counter-claim is to avoid multiplicity of proceedings by having the main suit and the counter-claim adjudicated together.
India Law Library Docid # 2432644

(11) PRAKASH ASPHALTINGS AND TOLL HIGHWAYS (INDIA) LIMITED Vs. MANDEEPA ENTERPRISES AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 12-09-2025
Tender Process — Rectification of Financial Bid — A bidder's request to rectify their financial bid by treating a per-day rate as a total contract period rate is not permissible after the financial bids have been opened, as it violates the sanctity of the tender process and specific clauses prohibiting changes to the Bill of Quantities (BOQ) template.
India Law Library Docid # 2432645

(12) MANIKLAL SAHU Vs. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 12-09-2025
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Sections 300, 302, 307 — Murder and Attempt to Murder — Causation of Death — Delay in Death — High Court altering conviction from Sec 302 to Sec 307 on the grounds that the victim died after 9 months due to complications arising from treatment, specifically pneumonia and septicemia, and not directly from the injuries sustained during the assault — Supreme Court held that
India Law Library Docid # 2432646

(13) SHANTI DEVI (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH LRS. GORAN Vs. JAGAN DEVI AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 12-09-2025
Limitation Act, 1963 — Articles 59 & 65 — Applicability to void transactions — Suit for possession based on title — Sale deed alleged to be fraudulent and void ab initio — Article 65 (12 years from adverse possession) applies to void documents, not Article 59 (3 years for cancellation of instrument) — Plaintiff not party to sale deed not obligated to seek cancellation, can treat as non-existent or seek declaration of
India Law Library Docid # 2432647

(14) SHIVAMMA (DEAD) BY LRS Vs. KARNATAKA HOUSING BOARD AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 12-09-2025
Limitation Act, 1963 — Section 5 — Condonation of delay — Interpretation of “within such period” — Sufficient cause must be shown for the entire period from accrual of cause of action till filing of appeal/application, not just the period of delay or from the last day of limitation
India Law Library Docid # 2432648

(15) COAL INDIA LTD. AND OTHERS Vs. M/S RAHUL INDUSTRIES AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 12-09-2025
Coal Mines (Nationalisation) Acts, 1972 & 1973 — Welfare State — Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs) — Duty to subserve common good — PSUs are not profit-making concerns but an extended arm of a welfare State.
India Law Library Docid # 2432649

(16) VANEETA PATNAIK Vs. NIRMAL KANTI CHAKRABARTI AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 12-09-2025
Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013 — Section 9 — Limitation for filing complaint — Complaint must be filed within three months of the last incident, extendable by three months — Subsequent administrative or collective decisions do not constitute sexual harassment unless directly linked to a prior overt act of sexual harassment
India Law Library Docid # 2432650

(17) GEETA @ REETA MISHRA Vs. AJAY KUMAR MISHRA[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 12-09-2025
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 — Section 13(1)(ia) — Cruelty — Divorce — High Court affirmed divorce decree granted by Family Court — Parties in constant acrimony since marriage — Wife made repeated police complaints — High Court found lodging false complaints amounted to cruelty — Parties separated for a long period with no reconciliation — Divorce decree upheld.
India Law Library Docid # 2432651

(18) REENA BANERJEE AND ANOTHER Vs. GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 12-09-2025
Disability Rights — Constitutional Mandate — Disability is a facet of human diversity, not merely a medical issue, and its recognition is crucial for constitutional democracy and social justice. Legal systems must move beyond medical accommodation to embrace equal participation for persons with disabilities. Accessibility and reasonable accommodation are fundamental constitutional principles, signifying democratic inclusivity
India Law Library Docid # 2432654

(19) M.S. PATTER Vs. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 12-09-2025
Constitution of India, 1950 — Preamble, Article 21, Directive Principles of State Policy (Articles 38, 39(e), 41, 47) — Right to life and personal liberty — Dignity, health, shelter, privacy, humane treatment — Beggars' Homes — Constitutional trust, not discretionary charity — State's affirmative and non-derogable responsibility towards indigent persons — Beggars' Homes as spaces of social justice, not social
India Law Library Docid # 2432653

(20) JYOTI SHARMA Vs. VISHNU GOYAL AND ANOTHER[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 11-09-2025
Civil Procedure, 1908 — Order 41 Rule 27 — Production of additional evidence in appeal — Rejection of application to produce probate order obtained after trial court and first appellate court decisions was upheld, as it was not obtained during pendency of earlier proceedings.
India Law Library Docid # 2432636