ive
User not Logged..
India's Biggest Headnotes Library over 53.69 Lakhs Headnotes
    Free Artificial Intelligence Drafting  

    Free Artificial Intelligence Case Analyzer  

   AI Submission Generator   

Latest Cases

(781) M/S ASP TRADERS Vs. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 24-07-2025
Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 — Section 129 — Detention, seizure and release of goods and conveyances in transit — Show cause notice — Payment of penalty — Obligation to pass final order — Where a show cause notice is issued under Section 129(3) of the CGST Act and the taxable person files objections against the proposed levy, the proper officer is duty-bound to pass a reasoned, speaking order
India Law Library Docid # 2428033

(782) HYATT INTERNATIONAL SOUTHWEST ASIA LTD. Vs. ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 24-07-2025
Income Tax Act, 1961 — Interpretation of Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) — Permanent Establishment (PE) — Article 5(1) of India-UAE DTAA — Fixed place of business — The core issue is whether the appellant, a Dubai-based company, had a PE in India under Article 5(1) of the India-UAE DTAA. The
India Law Library Docid # 2428034

(783) M/S RIMJHIM ISPAT LIMITED AND OTHERS Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 24-07-2025
Central Excise Act, 1944 — Sections 9 and 9AA — Criminal proceedings — Discharge application — Dismissal of discharge application by both Trial Court and High Court upheld — Criminal appeal dismissed — High Court's judgment affirmed — No interference warranted.
India Law Library Docid # 2428065

(784) SHESH BAHADUR SINGH(D) THR.LRS. Vs. RAM DAS SINGH(D) THR. LRS. AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 24-07-2025
Uttar Pradesh Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 — Section 49 — Bar to civil courts jurisdiction — A suit for cancellation of an order passed in consolidation proceedings is not maintainable if a notification has been issued under Section 4(2) of the Act and the matter could or ought to have been taken up under the Act. (Para 9,
India Law Library Docid # 2428311

(785) EKTA BHATNAGAR Vs. ASHUTOSH BHATNAGAR[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 24-07-2025
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 — Transfer Petition — Settlement Agreement — Supreme Court Mediation Centre — Parties resolved their dispute before the Supreme Court Mediation Centre and reduced the settlement into writing, signed by parties, counsel, and mediator — Supreme Court allowed the exemption application and accepted the settlement.
India Law Library Docid # 2433724

(786) M/S. AIREN AND ASSOCIATES Vs. M/S. SANMAR ENGINEERING SERVICES LIMITED[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 24-07-2025
Limitation Act, 1963 — Section 18 — Effect of acknowledgment in writing — Conditions for extension of limitation — Requires acknowledgment of liability in respect of the property or right claimed — Acknowledgment of a lesser amount due does not extend limitation for the entire claim.
India Law Library Docid # 2433725

(787) M/S. BENGANI FOOD PRODUCTS PRIVATE LIMITED AND ANOTHER Vs. NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 24-07-2025
Insurance Law — Marine Open Policy — Repudiation of claim — Goods damaged in transit — Policy coverage termination — Goods unloaded at railway yard and left in open siding after delivery — Damage due to heavy rainfall — Insurance coverage ceased upon unloading and delivery as per policy terms.
India Law Library Docid # 2433726

(788) M.C. RAVIKUMAR Vs. D.S. VELMURUGAN AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 23-07-2025
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 — Section 482 — Quashing of criminal proceedings — Second quashing petition — Maintainability — Not permissible to raise previously available grounds in a subsequent petition to effect a review of an earlier order, violating Section 362 CrPC — Exception is when there has been a
India Law Library Docid # 2428029

(789) KONDE NAGESHWAR RAO Vs. A. SRIRAMA CHANDRA MURTY AND ANOTHER[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 23-07-2025
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 — Section 482 — Quashing of proceedings — High Court quashed proceedings under SC/ST Act, 1989, against respondents — Appellant contended High Court erred in exercising jurisdiction, overlooking evidence, and conducting roving inquiry — Court held High Court’s scope under Section 482 is limited to determining if allegations disclose a cognizable offence, and
India Law Library Docid # 2428030

(790) SUA Vs. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 23-07-2025
Penal Code, 1860 — Sections 342 (Wrongful Confinement) and 376 (Rape) — Conviction and Sentence — Appeal against — Delay in FIR — Explained by the short duration of days in November, distance to police station, and victim narrating incident to mother in the evening.
India Law Library Docid # 2428031

(791) VISHNU VARDHAN @ VISHNU PRADHAN Vs. THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 23-07-2025
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 — Order 6 Rule 4 — Particulars of fraud to be stated in pleadings — Fraud must be pleaded and proved. (Para 3)

B. Constitution of India, 1950 — Article 32 — Writ jurisdiction — Violation of Fundamental Rights — A writ petition under Article 32 requires a prima facie case of violation or imminent threat of violation of a Fundamental Right, with specific pleadings and prayers for
India Law Library Docid # 2428032

(792) UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS Vs. R. SHANKARAPPA[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 23-07-2025
Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965, Rule 13(2) and Rule 14, Appendix 3 — Disciplinary proceedings for major penalties — Initiation of by authority competent to impose minor penalties — Permissible — Rule 13(2) allows a disciplinary authority competent to impose minor penalties to institute
India Law Library Docid # 2428056

(793) KOMALAN ETC. ETC. Vs. THE STATE OF KERALA REP. BY SECRETARY TAXES(A) DEPARTMENT AND ORS. ETC.[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 23-07-2025
Kerala Abkari Shops (Disposal in Auction) Rules, 2002 — Rule 9(2) — Violation — Prosecutions based on an outdated Government Order fixing Ethyl Alcohol content in coconut toddy at 8.1% v/v are unsustainable — Following an expert committee report, the maximum allowed ethyl alcohol content has been renotified as 8.98% v/v — Consequently, all prosecutions initiated under the old rule are quashed. (Paras 2,
India Law Library Docid # 2433718

(794) THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA Vs. VISHAL[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 23-07-2025
The present appeal arises out of a judgment[1] passed by the High Court[2] wherein it was opined that the investigating officer in a criminal case is not free to seize/attach any immovable property belonging to the respondents, where the respondent no.1 was not named as accused. While doing so the High Court had placed reliance on a Full Bench decision of the High Court in Sudhir Vasant Karhataki versus State of Maharashtra & others[3].
India Law Library Docid # 2433719

(795) STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR Vs. SURAIN SINGH LANGEH[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 23-07-2025
The State has filed the present appeal challenging the order[1] passed by the High Court[2] in the criminal revision[3]. The High Court, vide the aforesaid order, upheld the order passed by the Trial Court.
India Law Library Docid # 2433720

(796) PRADEEP MAHTO @ PRADEEP KUMAR MAHTO @ CHHABI MAHTO Vs. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND AND ANOTHER[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 23-07-2025
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 — Section 438 — Anticipatory Bail — Conditions imposed — While considering an anticipatory bail prayer, courts should primarily examine if a prima facie case of a serious offence is made out, necessity of custodial interrogation, and likelihood of flight risk — Imposing conditions like payment of costs for restoration of an application, which effectively treats the bail prayer as a
India Law Library Docid # 2433721

(797) N. ESWARANATHAN Vs. STATE REPRESENTED BY THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 23-07-2025
Contempt of Court — Conflicting orders by two judges — Matter referred to a three-judge bench for resolution of differences.
India Law Library Docid # 2433722

(798) ADITI ARYA Vs. THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND ANOTHER[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 23-07-2025
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 406 — Transfer of criminal case — Venue of trial — Wife filed transfer petition seeking to move a criminal case from Hyderabad to Vadodara — Court allowed the transfer as allegations indicated the respondent was influencing authorities and had caused termination of petitioner's services — Transfer favoured to a location where respondent was already involved in
India Law Library Docid # 2433723

(799) SHIVANGI BANSAL Vs. SAHIB BANSAL[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 22-07-2025
Transfer Petition — Jurisdiction — Courts — Petition seeking transfer of matrimonial and criminal cases from one state to another filed by both parties, wife seeking transfer of divorce case from Delhi to UP, husband seeking transfer of criminal cases from UP to Delhi. Parties have also filed special leave petitions against High Court orders. Supreme Court has the power to transfer cases.
India Law Library Docid # 2427990

(800) SAKSHI CHAUHAN Vs. DR. YASHWANT SINGH PARMAR UNIVERSITY OF HORTICULTURE & FORESTRY, NAUNI AND ANOTHER[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 22-07-2025
Education Law — Admissions — Eligibility Criteria — Prospectus issued by University — Amendments and Addendums — Appellant admitted to postgraduate program based on provisional admission — Completed course and received degree — University withdrew degree based on initial ineligibility — Court held that due to confusion and uncertainty caused by frequent changes in eligibility criteria, the
India Law Library Docid # 2427991