India Law Library

ive

User not Logged..

Law Books shopping cart Launched! - Big Offers & Huge Discounts - All Law Books at One Place — Limited Time Deals!!

Free Artificial Intelligence Drafting

Free Artificial Intelligence Case Analyzer

Latest Cases

1
2
3
4
5
»
Last

(1) SURINDER MOHAN AND ANOTHER Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 09-01-2026
Service Law — Recruitment — Eligibility Criteria — Educational Qualifications — Intelligence Assistant (Constable) and Intelligence Officer (Sub-Inspector) in Punjab Police Intelligence Wing — Challenge to rejection of candidature based on non-fulfilment of prescribed educational qualifications — Prescribed qualification requires a graduate with an 'O' Level Certificate from DOEACC/NIELIT or equivalent institution
India Law Library Docid # 2437936

(2) KRISHMA KUMRA Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 09-01-2026
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) — Section 483 (equivalent to Section 439 CrPC, 1973) — Regular Bail — Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) — Section 21, 22, 29 — Bail in Commercial Quantity Cases — Factors for granting bail include prolonged incarceration (over 1 year, 3 months, 22 days), slow pace of trial (no prosecution witness examined yet), and the right
India Law Library Docid # 2437937

(3) JAWAHAR SAW MILLS PVT. LTD. AND OTHERS Vs. M/S. GANESH SAW MILL AND OTHERS[BOMBAY HIGH COURT] 09-01-2026
Commercial Courts Act, 2015 — Section 15(4) — Transfer of suits from Civil Court to Commercial Court (Section 15(2)) — Applicability of Section 15(4) and Proviso to timelines — Section 15(2) and 15(4) apply only to suits pending on the date of establishment of the Commercial Court — Suits filed before a Civil Court subsequent to the establishment of the Commercial Court and later transferred to it are
India Law Library Docid # 2437952

(4) THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH Vs. ANURUDH AND ANOTHER[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 09-01-2026
Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 2012 — Determination of Victim's Age — Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection) Act, 2015 (JJ Act) — Section 94 — Procedure for Determination of Age — Bail Stage — Medical Age Determination — Determination of the victim’s age, which is the sine qua non for applying the POCSO Act, is fundamentally a matter for trial, not the bail stage. —
India Law Library Docid # 2437969

(5) M/S JINDAL EQUIPMENT LEASING CONSULTANCY SERVICES LTD Vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DELHI - II, NEW DELHI[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 09-01-2026
Income Tax Act, 1961 — Sections 28, 47(vii), 2(47), 2(14) — Taxability of Amalgamation — Shares held as Stock-in-Trade vs. Capital Assets — Receipt of shares of amalgamated company in lieu of shares of amalgamating company — If the shares of the amalgamating company were held as capital assets, the receipt of shares of the amalgamated company is a "transfer" under Section 2(47) but exempt from Capital Gains
India Law Library Docid # 2437970

(6) SHRIKRISHNA Vs. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 09-01-2026
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) Sections 302, 304 Part II, 147, 149 — Culpable Homicide not amounting to Murder — Distinction between Murder (Section 302) and Culpable Homicide (Section 304) — Circumstances warranting conviction under Section 304 Part II — Initial conviction under Section 302/149 altered by High Court to Section 304 Part II, IPC — Incident arising from sudden quarrel and group fight (free fight)
India Law Library Docid # 2437971

(7) X Vs. THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ANOTHER[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 09-01-2026
Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO Act) — Sections 5(l), 6, 9(g), 10 — Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) — Sections 65(1), 74, 137(2), 352 — Cancellation of Bail — Allegations of repeated aggravated penetrative sexual assault (gang rape) of a minor victim aged 14, committed under armed threat (katta), and recording the act for blackmail — High Court granting bail set aside by Supreme
India Law Library Docid # 2437972

(8) YERRAM VIJAY KUMAR Vs. THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND ANOTHER[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 09-01-2026
Companies Act, 2013 — Section 212(6) Second Proviso and Sections 447, 448, 451 — Cognizance of Offence — Bar on Special Court — Private Complaint — Section 448 (Punishment for false statement) mandates liability under Section 447; thus, the offence under Section 448 is an "offence covered under
India Law Library Docid # 2437973

(9) VARINDERJEET SINGH (WRONGLY MENTIONED AS VARINDER SINGH) Vs. JOGINDER PAL NARULA AND OTHERS[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 09-01-2026
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Order 9 Rule 7 — Application to set aside ex parte proceeding — Scope and Nature of Relief — The relief under Order 9 Rule 7 is discretionary and equitable — The applicant must establish 'good cause' for absence on the date proceeded ex parte — The provision does not confer an unfettered or vested right
India Law Library Docid # 2437931

(10) DEEPAK BHANDARI AND OTHERS Vs. OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR[MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT (INDORE BENCH)] 08-01-2026
Companies Act, 1956 — Winding Up — Claims of Creditor/Shareholder — Interest Rate on Deposits — Companies (Court) Rules, 1959, Rules 156 and 179 — Creditors challenged Official Liquidator's rejection of claim for 12% annual interest, awarded only 1.5% — Official Liquidator relied on Board Resolution (dated 28.04.1972 for accounting period 01.01.1971 to 31.12.1971) which fixed interest at 1.5% per annum — Rules 156
India Law Library Docid # 2437894

(11) SUMIT BANSAL Vs. M/S MGI DEVELOPERS AND PROMOTERS AND ANOTHER[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 08-01-2026
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 — Section 138 — Dishonour of Cheque — Separate Causes of Action — Quashing of Complaint under Section 482 Cr.P.C. — Where multiple cheques are issued in relation to the same underlying liability, but are distinct instruments (drawn on different accounts, presented on different dates, and dishonoured separately), each dishonour gives rise to a separate cause of action under
India Law Library Docid # 2437924

(12) C.S. PRASAD Vs. C. SATYAKUMAR AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 08-01-2026
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 482 — Inherent power of High Court to quash criminal proceedings — Principles governing exercise of power — High Court must exercise power sparingly, cautiously, and avoid usurping function of trial court or conducting mini-trial — Only requirement is to examine whether uncontroverted allegations in FIR, taken at face value, disclose commission of any cognizable offence — Reliability, sufficiency, or acceptability of evidence is not for
India Law Library Docid # 2437925

(13) STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND OTHERS Vs. BHAWANA MISHRA[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 08-01-2026
Service Law — Appointment — Ayurvedic Nursing Training Course — Right to Appointment — Candidates admitted to the course in a Government institution do not acquire an automatic right to appointment as Ayurvedic Staff Nurse upon completion of training, especially when there is a significant change in Government policy and the number of candidates available due to the grant of permission to private
India Law Library Docid # 2437926

(14) THE JOINT DIRECTOR (RAYALASEEMA), ANTI-CORRUPTION BUREAU, A.P. AND ANOTHER ETC. Vs. DAYAM PEDA RANGA RAO ETC.[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 08-01-2026
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Sections 2(s) and 2(o) — Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 — Andhra Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2014 — Sections 2(f), 100, 101, 102 — Quashing of FIRs — Jurisdiction of Anti-Corruption Bureau (ACB) Police Station post-bifurcation of Andhra Pradesh — High Court quashed Anti-Corruption Bureau FIRs on hyper-technical ground of lack of specific notification
India Law Library Docid # 2437927

(15) TEJ NARAIN SHARMA Vs. STATE OF DELHI[DELHI HIGH COURT] 08-01-2026
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 — Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) — Offence of illegal gratification/criminal misconduct — Mandatory requirement of proof of 'demand' — To establish guilt under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d)(i) and (ii), prosecution must prove both demand and acceptance/obtainment of illegal gratification by the public servant as a fact in issue (sine qua non) — Mere possession and recovery of
India Law Library Docid # 2437879

(16) RAMESH KUMAR Vs. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 08-01-2026
Service Law — Disciplinary Proceedings — Natural Justice — Disagreement with Inquiry Officer's Report — Punjab Police Rules, 1934 (as applicable to Haryana), Rule 16.24 — Where the Disciplinary Authority (DA) disagrees with the Inquiry Officer's report exonerating the delinquent employee, supplying the inquiry report along with the disagreement note-cum-show cause notice and affording an opportunity to file a reply and a personal hearing constitutes due compliance with principles of natural just
India Law Library Docid # 2437935

(17) TANCY BANSAL Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 08-01-2026
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 482 (or Section 528 of BNSS, 2023) — Quashing of FIR — Indian Penal Code (IPC) — Section 174-A (Non-appearance in response to proclamation) — Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (NI Act) — Section 138 (Cheque Bounce) — Abuse of process of law — FIR under Section 174-A IPC (for being declared a Proclaimed Person/Offender) derived from original criminal complaint under Section 138 NI Act — Original complaint settled and withdrawn
India Law Library Docid # 2437938

(18) RAJASTHAN STATE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AND INVESTMENT CORPORATION LTD. Vs. M/S KARAM BHOOMI ESTATES[RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT (JAIPUR BENCH)] 08-01-2026
Promissory Estoppel — Administrative Law — Binding nature of promise by public bodies — Rajasthan State Industrial Development and Investment Corporation Ltd. (RIICO) invited bids for land allotment — Writ Petitioner (Respondent) was the highest bidder, paid entire consideration, and initiated litigation when allotment was delayed/cancelled — RIICO's Infrastructure Development Committee (IDC) decided to execute the lease deed upon the condition that the Writ Petitioner withdraw its pending
India Law Library Docid # 2437945

(19) MANOJ Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND OTHERS[RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT] 08-01-2026
Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 2012 — Section 29 — Consent — Victim below 12 years — Where the victim is a minor below 12 years of age, the question of consent does not arise — Statutory presumption under Section 29 operates against the accused once foundational facts are established and remains
India Law Library Docid # 2437949

(20) SHOBHA AND OTHERS Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND OTHERS[RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT] 08-01-2026
Rajasthan Contractual Hiring to Civil Posts Rules, 2022 (Rules of 2022) — Rule 6 — Rajasthan Medical Health and Subordinate Service Rules, 1965 (Rules of 1965) — Rule 10 — Constitutional validity of minimum age requirement for contractual appointment — Minimum age for Auxiliary Nurse Midwife/Health Worker (Female) (ANM) — Rule 6 (Rules of 2022) prescribing minimum age of 21 years for contractual hiring declared
India Law Library Docid # 2437950

1
2
3
4
5
»
Last