India Law Library

User not Logged..

Free Artificial Intelligence Case Analyzer

Latest Cases

First
«
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
»
Last

(321) T.H. HOSAMANI Vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA AND OTHERS[KARNATAKA HIGH COURT (DHARWAD BENCH)] 18-11-2025
Karnataka Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and other Backward Classes (Reservation of Appointments, Etc.), Rules, 1992 — Rule 7(4) — Power of Directorate of Civil Rights Enforcement (CRE Cell) — Investigation into Caste Certificates — Rule 7(4) mandates that the CRE Cell can only initiate a detailed investigation upon a reference being made by the District Caste Verification
India Law Library Docid # 2435944

(322) SRI LAKSHMI HOTEL PVT. LIMITED AND ANOTHER Vs. SRIRAM CITY UNION FINANCE LTD. AND ANOTHER[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 18-11-2025
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Section 37 read with Section 34 — Scope of Interference — Concurrent Findings — Statutory prohibition against re-appreciation of evidence — Challenges to arbitral award upholding 24% interest rate based on loan agreement terms dismissed by Single Judge and Division Bench;
India Law Library Docid # 2435409

(323) SHRIBADAMATHRELIGIOUS ENDOWMENT SITAMAU AND OTHERS Vs. DEEPAKGIRI AND OTHERS[MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT (INDORE BENCH)] 18-11-2025
Limitation Act, 1963 — Section 5 — Condonation of Delay — Second Appeal (First Appellate Court dismissed the appeal on merits) — Principles for considering Condonation of Delay — Courts must adopt a liberal, pragmatic, and justice-oriented approach, but technical considerations are not dispensed with entirely; the explanation for delay must show sufficient cause and lack of gross negligence or bad faith/lack of bona
India Law Library Docid # 2435656

(324) GAUTAM MEHRA Vs. SONIA MEHRA[DELHI HIGH COURT] 18-11-2025
Family Law — Custody of Minor Children — Interim Custody and Visitation — Appeals against Family Court orders — Family Courts Act, 1984, Section 19 — Guardians and Wards Act, 1890, Section 17 — Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956, Section 13 — Paramount consideration in child custody disputes is the welfare of the child (physical, emotional, moral, and intellectual), transcending the
India Law Library Docid # 2435969

(325) ARYAN INFRAHEIGHT P LIMITED Vs. SIGNATURE GLOBAL INDIA LTD[DELHI HIGH COURT] 18-11-2025
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Section 11(6) — Appointment of Arbitrator — Territorial Jurisdiction of the High Court — Determination of Jurisdiction — Where no seat or venue of arbitration is designated in the arbitration agreement, the territorial jurisdiction for Section 11 applications is governed by Sections 16 to 20 of the Civil Procedure Code (CPC) — Petitioners sought
India Law Library Docid # 2435970

(326) BUNTY KUMAR Vs. THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI[DELHI HIGH COURT] 18-11-2025
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 392 (Robbery) read with Section 34 — Conviction — Appellate Court found complainant's testimony cogent, credible, and supported by identification of appellants, corroboration from other witnesses regarding possession of money, and recovery of stolen amount, motorcycle (used in offense), and items purchased from robbed money at instance of accused —
India Law Library Docid # 2435971

(327) MANJU DUA AND OTHERS Vs. STATE OF NCT GOVERNAMENT OF DELHI[DELHI HIGH COURT] 18-11-2025
Criminal Procedure — Quashing of FIR — Sections 498A/406/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 — Matrimonial disputes — Settlement between parties — FIR arising out of matrimonial dispute (Sections 498A/406/34 IPC and Sections 3/4 DP Act) quashed in exercise of
India Law Library Docid # 2435972

(328) RAJNEESH KUMAR PANDEY AND OTHERS Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 18-11-2025
Education — Teacher Eligibility Test (TET) — Special Educators for Children with Special Needs (CwSN) — Requirement of TET qualification for appointment of Special Educators — Supreme Court directing Union of India to obtain instructions on whether TET is a mandatory qualification nationally for Special Educators, especially since one State (Uttar Pradesh) prescribed it — Court also seeking clarity
India Law Library Docid # 2436067

(329) RANIMOL AND OTHERS Vs. THE STATE OF KERALA AND ANOTHER[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 18-11-2025
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 200 — Private Complaint after Police Closure Report — Abuse of Process of Law — Filing a private complaint under Section 200 Cr.P.C. by the same informant, relating to the same occurrence and against the same accused (who were dropped from the initial investigation after a detailed investigation and negative report), amounts to a gross abuse and misuse of
India Law Library Docid # 2436068

(330) SHAHID ALAM Vs. ARUN KUMAR YADAV @ BALMIKI YADAV AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 18-11-2025
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Res Judicata — Consideration of Plea — The plea of res judicata is a valuable right inherent in a person who raises it and must be considered on its own merits, preferably at the very first instance, to prevent misuse and abuse of the process of the Court by re-agitating matters already decided — Failure of the High Court to apply judicial mind to the plea and instead holding
India Law Library Docid # 2436070

(331) LAL CHANDRA RAM Vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 18-11-2025
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Setting Criminal Law in Motion — Locus Standi — General Principle — Anyone can set or put the criminal law into motion, including by filing a complaint, unless the statue creating the offense explicitly indicates a contrary restriction on the eligibility of the complainant — The power to file an FIR or a complaint is not restricted to specific authorities, even if
India Law Library Docid # 2436075

(332) SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA Vs. D. SUNDARARAJAN ETC.[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 18-11-2025
Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 — Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) — Appeal to Supreme Court — Dismissal — The Supreme Court found no error, specifically no error of law, committed by the Securities Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai in passing the impugned order dated May 18, 2023, and accordingly dismissed the Civil Appeals filed by the Securities and Exchange Board of India.
India Law Library Docid # 2436093

(333) ISMAIL KHAN @ PATHAN Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 18-11-2025
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) — Sections 8 and 20 — Regular Bail — Factors considered for enlargement on bail — Recovery of 49.8 kgs. of ganja — Appellant in custody for more than 2 years and 8 months — Trial commenced — Co-accused already released on bail — Considering the period of incarceration already undergone and the time likely to be taken for conclusion of the trial,
India Law Library Docid # 2436137

(334) VIRENDER SINGH DONGWAL Vs. MANJU AGGARWAL[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 18-11-2025
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 — Section 138 (Dishonour of cheque) — Offence under Section 138 is quasi-criminal and compoundable under Section 147 — Legislative intent is to ensure payment and promote cheque credibility.
India Law Library Docid # 2436162

(335) MARAM REDDY VENKATA REDDY Vs. STATE OF A.P.[ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT] 18-11-2025
Penal Code (IPC), 1860 — Section 302 read with Section 34 — Murder with common intention — Evidence — Appreciation of evidence — Where conviction rests on eyewitness testimony (P.Ws.4 and 5) which attributes only a single stab wound to A-1, and no specific overt act is attributed to A-2, the conviction under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC cannot be sustained against A-2 — The
India Law Library Docid # 2436191

(336) MODUGUMUDI MASTHAN Vs. ANKEM NAGA AMALA SWAMY DIED AND OTHERS[ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT] 18-11-2025
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Section 100 — Second Appeal — Scope — A second appeal can be admitted only if the appellant raises a substantial question of law — The substantial question of law must directly and substantially affect the rights of the parties, and either be an open question not finally settled by superior Courts, or not free from difficulty/cause for discussion of alternative views — Mere appreciation
India Law Library Docid # 2436192

(337) T. JAYAMMA Vs. R. PRASANALAKSHMI AND OTHERS[ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT] 18-11-2025
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Order 7 Rule 11(d) — Rejection of Plaint — Bar of Limitation — An application for rejection of plaint under Order 7 Rule 11(d) on the ground of bar of limitation requires the court to examine the averments in the plaint and documents attached thereto to determine if the suit is 'clearly' barred by the law of limitation — The question of limitation, though often a mixed question of fact
India Law Library Docid # 2436193

(338) AMAN HOSPITALITY PVT. LTD. Vs. JAMMU AND KASHMIR BANK LTD. AND OTHERS[JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH HIGH COURT AT SRINAGAR] 18-11-2025
Banking Law — Classification of Account as Fraud — Reserve Bank of India (RBI) Master Directions on Frauds — Principles of Natural Justice — The RBI Master Directions on Frauds do not expressly provide for an opportunity of hearing (show cause notice) to borrowers before classifying their account as fraud — High Court, relying on Supreme Court judgment in State Bank of India vs. Rajesh Aggarwal (2023 SCC Online
India Law Library Docid # 2436251

(339) JAMMU COLLEGE OF PHYSIOTHERAPY Vs. STATE OF J&K AND OTHERS[JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH HIGH COURT AT JAMMU] 18-11-2025
Writ Petition — Admission to Professional Courses — Bachelor of Physiotherapy (BPT) Course — Management Quota Admissions — Admission of eight students below prescribed cut-off merit (65 marks) for BPT Course for the year 2017-18 under Management Quota — Challenge to the competence of J&K BoPEE (Respondent No. 2) to prescribe cut-off marks for BPT admissions — Repeated interim directions by the High Court over several years allowing students to appear in examinations subject
India Law Library Docid # 2436265

(340) KULDEEP NANDRAJOG Vs. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND[UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT] 18-11-2025
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) — Section 528 (Application for Directions) — Bail — Furnishing of Sureties — Multiple First Information Reports (FIRs) — Where an accused has been granted bail in a large number of similar cases (96 FIRs in this case, all for offenses under IPC Sections 420 and 120-B arising from similar transactions) but remains incarcerated solely because of the practical impossibility of
India Law Library Docid # 2436551

First
«
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
»
Last