India Law Library

User not Logged..

Law Books shopping cart Launched! - Big Offers & Huge Discounts - All Law Books at One Place — Limited Time Deals!!

Free Artificial Intelligence Case Analyzer

Latest Cases

First
«
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
»
Last

(401) RAMESH @ BHAIJAN MOHAN PATIL Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA[BOMBAY HIGH COURT] 17-01-2026
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 396 — Dacoity with Murder — Liability of all participants — If any one of five or more persons committing dacoity commits murder during that dacoity, every person involved is liable for the murder, regardless of who inflicted the fatal blow.
India Law Library Docid # 2439013

(402) STATE OF MAHARASHTRA Vs. M/S. PATWARDHAN INFRASTURCTURE PVT. LTD.[BOMBAY HIGH COURT] 17-01-2026
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Section 37 — Appeal against arbitral award and judgment upholding it — Standard of review for Section 37 Court is same as Section 34 Court, especially concerning pre-2015 amendments — Grounds for interference under Section 34 prior to 2015 amendments were limited, not including "patent illegality" or Explanation 1 to Section 34(2)(b)(ii) concerning public policy.
India Law Library Docid # 2439014

(403) AIRPORT AUTHORITY OF INDIA AND OTHERS Vs. SHAM KRISHNA B AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 16-01-2026
Reservation in Public Employment — Migration of Reserved Category Candidates — Reserved category candidates who score higher marks than the cut-off for General Category candidates must be treated as qualified against an open/unreserved post, provided they did not avail of any concession or relaxation. Their appointment on merit in the general category does not count against the reserved category quota.
India Law Library Docid # 2438266

(404) MD. FIROZ MANSURI AND OTHERS Vs. THE STATE OF BIHAR AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 16-01-2026
Bihar Pharmacists Cadre Rules, 2014 (as amended in 2024) — Rule 6(1) and Note in Appendix-I — Constitutional validity — Fixation of minimum qualification for recruitment of Pharmacist — Held valid — "Note" providing Bachelor’s/Master’s degree holders are eligible subject to possession of Diploma is not arbitrary or exclusionary — Supreme Court upheld the validity of the amended Cadre Rules,
India Law Library Docid # 2438267

(405) TULASAREDDI @ MUDAKAPPA AND ANOTHER Vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 16-01-2026
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Sections 302, 120-B, 201, 506 read with Section 34 — Conviction by High Court after acquittal by Trial Court — Supreme Court's role — Appellate court can review and reconsider evidence, but must respect the presumption of innocence accorded to an accused who has been acquitted. A plausible view taken by the trial court should not be overturned merely because another view is possible.
India Law Library Docid # 2438268

(406) HT MEDIA LIMITED Vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER DELHI SOUTH GOODS AND SERVICE TAX[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 16-01-2026
Finance Act, 1994 — Section 65(105)(zu) — Event Management Service — Service Tax cannot be imposed if the activity does not fall strictly within the definition of "event management" as provided in the statute. Strict interpretation of taxing statutes is crucial.
India Law Library Docid # 2438269

(407) X Vs. O/O SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF PEOPLE & ORS. . RESPONDENTS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 16-01-2026
Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968 — Section 3(2), First Proviso — Constitution of Joint Committee — Proviso applies only when notices of motion given on the same day in both Houses are admitted by both Houses — Does not mandate a Joint Committee if the motion is admitted in one House and rejected in the other — Presiding Officer of the House where motion is admitted can independently proceed to constitute a
India Law Library Docid # 2438270

(408) SMT. SUNITA DEVI AND OTHERS Vs. SH. NARINDER KUMAR AND OTHERS[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 16-01-2026
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — Compensation for death in motor accident — Appeal for enhancement of compensation — Cross objections by Insurance Company seeking setting aside of award — Tribunal found negligence of driver in favour of claimants.
India Law Library Docid # 2438327

(409) DR. MANOJ KUMAR Vs. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND AND OTHERS[UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT] 16-01-2026
Public Service Commission — Age Limit Relaxation — Uttarakhand Public Service (Relaxation in Age Limit for Recruitment) Rules, 2003, Rule 3 — Uttarakhand Medical and Health Service Rules, 2014, Rule 10 — Uttarakhand Recruitment in Service Upper Age Limit Rules, 2014, Rule 2 — Rejection of representation for age relaxation — State government's power to grant relaxation — Impugned order passed without considering the power to grant relaxation — Order quashed.
India Law Library Docid # 2438340

(410) BPL LIMITED Vs. MORGAN SECURITIES AND CREDITS PRIVATE LIMITED[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 16-01-2026
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 — Order 47, Rule 1, Section 152 — Review — Rectification of clerical errors — Court has the power to correct inadvertent clerical or typographical errors in its judgments to ensure accuracy and reflect the true intent of the court — Such corrections do not alter the substance of the original judgment but merely correct mistakes in its transcription.
India Law Library Docid # 2438352

(411) NARINDERDEEP TANDAN @ NARINDERDEEP TANDON @ NENA Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 16-01-2026
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 438 — Conditions of Bail — Court directed release on bail in anticipation of arrest, subject to terms and conditions imposed by trial court — Further directed appellant not to dissuade witnesses, and to attend police station if called for further investigation — Clarified that grant of bail
India Law Library Docid # 2438517

(412) KUSUM KUMARI @ SONI KUMARI Vs. STATE OF BIHAR[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 16-01-2026
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 438 — Anticipatory Bail — Denial by High Court — Appellant aggrieved by denial of anticipatory bail by High Court — Supreme Court opinion that custodial interrogation not warranted — Appellant to cooperate with investigation — Supreme Court directs no coercive action.
India Law Library Docid # 2438529

(413) ANIL Vs. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 16-01-2026
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 389 — Suspension of sentence — Appeal pending for seven years in High Court — Appellant has undergone more than nine years in custody with remission — High Court rejected application for suspension of sentence — Supreme Court granted leave, set aside High Court's order, and suspended sentence, releasing appellant on bail, considering the delay in appeal
India Law Library Docid # 2438541

(414) ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 10(1), NEW DELHI Vs. THE INDEX SECURITIES & RESEARCH PVT. LTD.[INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI] 16-01-2026
Income Tax Act, 1961 — Section 68 — Cash Credits — Burden of Proof — The assessee bears the initial burden to explain the nature and source of any credit in its books. Mere reflection in bank statements or books does not discharge this burden if transactions are found to be a device for providing accommodation entries.
India Law Library Docid # 2438581

(415) ARCHNA CHADHA OFFICE Vs. ACIT, CIRCLE 52(1), NEW DELHI[INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI] 16-01-2026
Income Tax Act, 1961 — Section 143(3) — Assessment proceedings — Mesne profits — Taxability — Amount received as mesne profits for wrongful occupation of property after termination of lease is considered a revenue receipt and is taxable — Hon'ble jurisdictional High Court's decision in Skyland Builders Pvt. Ltd. is a binding precedent.
India Law Library Docid # 2438582

(416) MRS. ZIA RATHI Vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-44(3), DELHI[INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI] 16-01-2026
Income Tax Act, 1961, Section 68 — Cash Credit — Unexplained Cash Deposits — Addition sustained by CIT(A) on substantive basis, though AO made it on protective basis — Assessee explained cash deposits from business sales, supported by sales register, purchase register, stock register, cash book, and VAT returns — AO did not doubt books of account or profit declared — Supplier confirmed sales to assessee —
India Law Library Docid # 2438583

(417) HERO FINCOP LTD. Vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-11(1), NEW DELHI[INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI] 16-01-2026
Income Tax Act, 1961 — Section 251(1) and 250(6) — Powers of Commissioner (Appeals) — Duty to adjudicate on merits — Commissioner (Appeals) cannot pass an order stating an issue cannot be adjudicated due to lack of facts and dismiss the ground as not adjudicated — Must decide on merits or annul assessment.
India Law Library Docid # 2438584

(418) NOIDA TOWERS PRIVATE LIMITED Vs. ASSESSMENT UNIT, NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE, INCOME-TAX DEPARTMENT[INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI] 16-01-2026
Income Tax Act, 1961 — Section 94B — Disallowance of interest paid to Associated Enterprise — Double taxation — Arm's Length Price (ALP) adjustment — Assessee had already disallowed and added back the entire interest paid to its Associated Enterprise (AE) under Section 94B of the Act. The Assessing Officer (AO) then made a further addition based on an Arm's Length Price (ALP) adjustment for the same interest. The
India Law Library Docid # 2438585

(419) ACIT Vs. JALCO FINANCIAL SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED[INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI] 16-01-2026
Income Tax Act, 1961 — Section 37(1) — Business Expenditure — Penalty levied by SEBI — Penalty paid to SEBI in the course of regular business operations for alleged unfair trade practices, to avoid long-drawn litigation and protect reputation, is an allowable expenditure under Section 37(1). The explanation to Section 37(1) disallows expenses incurred for an offense prohibited by law, but this does not apply to payments
India Law Library Docid # 2438586

(420) HORIZON BUILDMART PVT. LTD. Vs. ASST. CIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-II, FARIDABAD, HARYANA[INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI] 16-01-2026
Income Tax Act, 1961 — Section 147 & 148 — Reopening of assessment — Validity of reassessment proceedings — Grounds for reopening — Reliance on search material from other groups — The Assessing Officer can initiate reassessment proceedings under Section 147 even if proceedings under Section 153C could have been initiated, provided the jurisdictional conditions for Section 153C are not satisfied. Reassessment under
India Law Library Docid # 2438587

First
«
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
»
Last