ive
User not Logged..
India's Biggest Headnotes Library over 53.69 Lakhs Headnotes
    Free Artificial Intelligence Drafting  

    Free Artificial Intelligence Case Analyzer  

   AI Submission Generator   

Latest Cases

(621) MIRZA ASLAM BEIGH RASHID BEIGH AND OTHERS Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS[BOMBAY HIGH COURT (NAGPUR BENCH)] 26-09-2025
Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO Act) — Sections 4(1), 8, 9, 10, 11 of Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006, Section 64(1) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 — Offences against minor girl — Quashing FIR — Applicant argued for quashing FIR due to love affair and subsequent marriage with victim, who was a minor at the time of sexual relationship and marriage, and has since
India Law Library Docid # 2434504

(622) MANU @ MOHINDER MADHURESH Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA[BOMBAY HIGH COURT] 26-09-2025
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Sections 302 and 376 — Appeal against conviction and sentence for murder and rape — Court confirmed conviction for murder based on a complete chain of circumstantial evidence including motive, accused's anger over a broken love affair, threats made, harassment of the deceased, deceased being alone at home, accused's suspicious movements, his absconding, extra-judicial confession and
India Law Library Docid # 2434488

(623) JAIPAKASH KRISHNASWAMY NAIDU AND OTHERS Vs. M/S. NORTHERN OPERATING SERVICES PVT. LTD[KARNATAKA HIGH COURT] 26-09-2025
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Section 37(1)(c) — Appeal against judgment setting aside arbitral award — Employee seeking modification of arbitral award to grant monetary reliefs not awarded by arbitrator or court — Held, Section 37 does not empower courts to modify or grant claims not awarded by arbitrator. Courts setting aside an award can only allow parties to recommence arbitration if desired.
India Law Library Docid # 2434553

(624) VEERABHADRAPPA AND OTHERS Vs. CHANNAPPA GOWDA D DEAD BY LR'S AND OTHERS[KARNATAKA HIGH COURT] 26-09-2025
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Section 100 — Second Appeal — Substantial Question of Law — Courts below erred in drawing final decree proceeding as per joint memo when Commissioner refused partition for a certain extent of land due to non-inclusion during demarcation, and issues regarding entitlement to partition based on survey demarcation versus actual possession.
India Law Library Docid # 2434554

(625) NARA SURYANARAYANA REDDY Vs. INITIATING OFFICER, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, (BENAMI PROHIBITION)[KARNATAKA HIGH COURT (DHARWAD BENCH)] 26-09-2025
Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988 — Section 24(1), 24(2), and 24(2A) — Notice and attachment of property — Requirement to call upon beneficial owner to reply — Notice issued to Benamidar under Section 24(1) was marked to the beneficial owner under Section 24(2) — Beneficial owner argued that the notice did not specifically call upon them to reply, violating principles of natural justice — Revenue argued that Section 24(2A) allows the beneficial owner to reply if
India Law Library Docid # 2434558

(626) SHANKAR Vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND OTHERS[KARNATAKA HIGH COURT (DHARWAD BENCH)] 26-09-2025
Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959 — Section 2(e-1-a) and 2(e-2-1); Section 29E; Rule 14AF of Karnataka Co-operative Societies Rules, 1960 — Delegate of Co-operative Society — Director nominated or co-opted can be a delegate. The definition of 'Director' includes nominated or co-opted members, and thus a nominated or co-opted director is eligible to be appointed as a delegate.
India Law Library Docid # 2434559

(627) VISHWANATH Vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA[KARNATAKA HIGH COURT (DHARWAD BENCH)] 26-09-2025
Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 — Section 21(1) and (2) — Appointment of Inspectors — Notification requirement upon transfer — A notification appointing an Inspector under Section 21(1) of the Act is for the initial appointment and for assigning areas. A subsequent transfer of an Inspector to a different area does not require a fresh notification under Section 21(1); such transfers fall under the ambit of
India Law Library Docid # 2434560

(628) SAYAWWA AND OTHERS Vs. MALLAPPA SIDRAMAPPA NEMAGOUDAR AND OTHERS[KARNATAKA HIGH COURT (KALABURAGI BENCH)] 26-09-2025
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — Section 147 — Compulsory Third Party Insurance — Tractor-trailer combination as a single unit for insurance purposes — If the trailer is insured, the insurance company is liable for third-party claims arising from its use, even if the tractor is not insured — The trailer, when attached to a tractor, is considered part of the motor vehicle and its insurance covers third-party risks.
India Law Library Docid # 2434562

(629) NARNE ESTATES PRIVATE LTD. Vs. NELLUTLA KUMMARI SHIVA RAJU AND OTHERS[TELANGANA HIGH COURT] 26-09-2025
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Order 18, Rule 17 — Power to recall and examine witness — This rule is intended to enable the Court to clarify any issue or doubt by recalling a witness, either on its own or on a party's application, so that the Court can ask questions and elicit answers — It is not meant for parties to recall a witness for further examination or to fill up lacunae in their evidence — The stage of the suit and the
India Law Library Docid # 2434563

(630) P. DHEERAJ RANGA REDDY Vs. STATE OF TELANGANA[TELANGANA HIGH COURT] 26-09-2025
Registration Act, 1908 — Rule 26(i)(k) and Rule 243 of Telangana Rules — Cancellation of Sale Deeds — Unilateral cancellation without notice and without court order is illegal and arbitrary — Registration authorities must follow due process and principles of natural justice — Properties not notified as prohibited under Section 22-A of
India Law Library Docid # 2434564

(631) MR. VUNUKONDA PRAKASH RAO AND OTHERS Vs. VUNUKONDA MALLESHAM AND OTHERS[TELANGANA HIGH COURT] 26-09-2025
Administrators General Act, 1963 — Section 29 — Grant of Certificate — Scope — Administrator General can grant certificate for assets not exceeding Rs. 10 lakhs. The value of the subject property in this case exceeded this limit at the time of the gift deed execution, rendering the Administrator General's action without jurisdiction.
India Law Library Docid # 2434565

(632) STATE OF TELANGANA AND OTHERS Vs. M. ANTHAMMA[TELANGANA HIGH COURT] 26-09-2025
Land Revenue Act, 1317 Fasli (Telangana Land Revenue Act) — Section 166-B — Cancellation of assignment — Assignment of land to a minor — Respondent was assigned land in 1961 when a minor. Her father passed away in 1960 leaving her as legal heir. She was in continuous possession and cultivation of the land, and her name was mutated in revenue records, with Pattadar Pass Book and Title Deeds issued. — Cancellation proceedings initiated in 1998, after more than three decades, on grounds of
India Law Library Docid # 2434566

(633) LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER & REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER PEDDAPALLI Vs. M. ANJAIAH AND OTHERS[TELANGANA HIGH COURT] 26-09-2025
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 — Section 54 — Appeal against enhanced compensation — Reference Court's enhanced compensation upheld — Sale deeds of adjacent lands relied upon for comparison were genuine and representative — LAO's reliance on distant agricultural lands was not appropriate.
India Law Library Docid # 2434567

(634) L AND T INFRA INVESTMENT PARTNERS ADVISORY PRIVATE LIMITED Vs. BHORUKA POWER CORPORATION LIMITED[KARNATAKA HIGH COURT] 26-09-2025
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Section 5 — Extent of judicial intervention — Civil suits to restrain domestic arbitration proceedings are generally barred — Civil courts' jurisdiction is limited to intervening only as expressly provided in Part I of the Act — Section 5 bars interference in arbitral proceedings governed by Part I, except as specified — This principle is based on the object of minimizing
India Law Library Docid # 2434634

(635) RAHUL CHAUDHARY Vs. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND AND ANOTHER[UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT] 26-09-2025
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 — Sections 9-A, 25-A, 26, 29 — Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Sections 420, 467 — Framing of charges — Scope of interference at this stage — Court's function is limited to prima facie examination of whether there exists a strong suspicion or sufficient ground to believe that the accused may have committed the alleged offence.
India Law Library Docid # 2434671

(636) BEENA SAH AND OTHERS Vs. DEEPA SAH AND OTHERS[UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT] 26-09-2025
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Order 43 Rule 1(r) — Appeal against order of temporary injunction — Partition Suit — Co-ownership — Temporary injunction against a co-owner is generally impermissible unless there is ouster, denial of title, or exclusion for a statutory period.
India Law Library Docid # 2434672

(637) THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD. Vs. SMT. LAXMI AND OTHERS[UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT] 26-09-2025
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — Section 173 , Section 166 , Section 3 , Section 149(2) , Section 15 — Appeal against award of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal — Insurer's liability — Driver's license validity — "Pay and Recover" doctrine — Facts indicate a genuine dispute regarding the renewal of the driver's license at the time of the accident. The owner presented renewal documents that appeared to validate the
India Law Library Docid # 2434673

(638) GAURAV AGARWAL Vs. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND AND ANOTHER[UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT] 26-09-2025
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 — Section 138 — Dishonour of cheque for insufficient funds — Cheque reported lost and payment stopped prior to alleged issuance date — Subsequent presentation and dishonour cannot form basis of offence under Section 138 as there was no valid issuance.
India Law Library Docid # 2434674

(639) ODELA SATYAM AND ANOTHER Vs. THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 26-09-2025
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Clubbing of FIRs — Multiple FIRs arising from same cause of action and modus operandi — Generally, clubbing of FIRs across different states is not permissible due to different jurisdictions and potential complexities in investigation and trial necessitating presence of witnesses from various locations.
India Law Library Docid # 2434748

(640) SMT. CHANDRA KALA AND OTHERS Vs. ICICI LOMBARD MOTOR INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 26-09-2025
Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 — Quantum of compensation — Assessment of income — Deceased was a mason earning Rs. 400 per day — Tribunal adopted Rs. 189 per day due to lack of documentary proof — High Court confirmed this — Supreme Court held that for a coolie, minimum wage was Rs. 4,500 in 2004, and with annual increase, in 2014, it would be Rs. 9,500 per month — Ascertained monthly income of
India Law Library Docid # 2434749