(121) UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS Vs. DAYA SHANKER TIWAR[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 26-11-2024 Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 21(b) — Revisionary Jurisdiction — Appeal dismissed by State Commission — Revision Petition filed against the order of State Commission — Interference in revisional jurisdiction — Such interference is warranted only when there is an illegality, material irregularity or jurisdictional error in the order of the State Commission. India Law Library Docid # 2420422
(122) HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY NOW, HARYANA SHEHRI VIKAS PRADHIKARAN AND OTHERS Vs. RADHA THAKUR AND OTHERS[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 26-11-2024 Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Jurisdiction — Arbitration Clause — OPs waived right to object consumer forum jurisdiction by contesting complaint on merits, not raising arbitration objection earlier. Emaar MGF Land Ltd. v. Aftab Singh (2018 SCC Online SC 2378) cited. India Law Library Docid # 2420423
(123) NORTHERN RAILWAY RAILWAY STATION Vs. BALBIR SINGH[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 26-11-2024 Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 21(b) — Revision petition against order of State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission — Dismissing appeal and upholding District Forum's order — Theft of luggage from reserved coach — Liability of Railways — Consumer Protection Act provides remedies in addition to other statutes — Supreme Court in Station Superintendent & Anr. Vs. Surender Bhola held that Railways cannot be held responsible if passenger is unable to protect own belongings. India Law Library Docid # 2420424
(124) LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER Vs. SATWINDER KAUR[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 26-11-2024 Consumer Protection Act, 1986 Section 58(1)(b) Revision Petition Scope of Court upheld concurrent findings of lower fora if no illegality or material irregularity. India Law Library Docid # 2420425
(125) RAJASTHAN STATE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AND INVESTMENT CORPORATION LTD. (RIICO) Vs. DWARKA PRASAD AND OTHERS[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 25-11-2024 Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Section 21(b) — Revisionary Powers of National Commission — Limited Scope — National Commission's power of revision is limited to cases where the State Commission has acted without jurisdiction, failed to exercise jurisdiction, or acted illegally or with material irregularity — Interference is not warranted with concurrent findings of fact by the District Forum and State Commission unless these parameters are met. India Law Library Docid # 2420383
(126) TAPAS KANTI SENGUPTA Vs. TATA MOTORS LTD. AND OTHERS[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 25-11-2024 Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Section 21(b) — Revisionary jurisdiction — Consumer Protection Act, 2019 — Section 58(1)(b) — Scope of revision — National Commission's revisional jurisdiction is limited and should only be exercised when a State Commission has acted illegally or with material irregularity, or exceeded or failed to exercise its jurisdiction — Interference with concurrent findings of fact by lower forums is not permissible unless those findings are perverse — Supreme Court decision India Law Library Docid # 2420414
(127) BANK OF BARODA AND ANOTHER Vs. SIKANDER ALI AND ANOTHER[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 25-11-2024 Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Section 21(b) — Revision Jurisdiction — Limited scope — The National Commission's revisional jurisdiction is very limited and can only be exercised when the State Commission exceeds its jurisdiction, fails to exercise its vested jurisdiction, or acts illegally or with material irregularity — The commission cannot re-examine facts or evidence already considered by the lower forums. India Law Library Docid # 2420415
(128) KRISHNA KUMAR KUSHWAHA Vs. MANAGING DIRECTOR, UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. AND ANOTHER[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 25-11-2024 Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Revisionary Jurisdiction — Scope — Limited jurisdiction of National Commission under Section 21(b) — Interference only when State Commission exceeded or failed to exercise jurisdiction, or acted illegally or with material irregularity — No interference with concurrent findings of fact based on appreciation of evidence. India Law Library Docid # 2420416
(129) ONE SCHOOL GOA Vs. VIBHA SINGH[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 25-11-2024 Consumer Protection Act, 2019 — Section 58(1)(b) — Revision Petition — Delay in filing appeal — Condonation of delay due to Covid-19 pandemic — Supreme Court order extending limitation period — Factual position on receipt of order and subsequent administrative delays — Grounds for condonation accepted — Appeal restored to file. India Law Library Docid # 2420417
(130) BHARTI AXA GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. Vs. MOOL CHAND LALWANI[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 25-11-2024 Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Section 21(b) — Revision Petition — Delay condonation — Delay of 107 days in filing Revision Petition — Condoned as delay occurred during suspended period of limitation due to Covid-19 pandemic. India Law Library Docid # 2420418
(131) MUKESH KUMAR KAUSHAL Vs. ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. AND ANOTHER[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 25-11-2024 CONSUMER PROTECTION LAW — Revision Petition — Scope of Jurisdiction — National Commission's revisional jurisdiction is limited to cases involving jurisdictional errors, material irregularities, or perversity in lower fora's orders — Cannot interfere with concurrent findings of fact based on appreciation of evidence unless such findings are illegal, irregular, or perverse. India Law Library Docid # 2420419
(132) FAST ENGINEERS Vs. DEEPSHIKHA KALA SANSTHAN[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 21-11-2024 Consumer Protection Act, 2019 Section 51 Appeal against State Commission Order Appellant filed appeal against order allowing consumer complaint. India Law Library Docid # 2420379
(133) ABDUL GAGOOR Vs. JOSE K.V[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 21-11-2024 Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Section 21(b) — Revision Petition — Appeal against State Commission order reversing District Forum order — Parties referred to their original complaint roles — Complainant alleged defective construction and demanded refund — Opposite Party (OP) claimed delayed payments by complainant caused construction delays — District Forum directed both parties to fulfill obligations — State Commission allowed complainant's appeal, ordering OP to refund excess amount with inte India Law Library Docid # 2420380
(134) STATE BANK OF INDIA Vs. JAIPUR VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 21-11-2024 Consumer Protection Act, 2019 — Section 58(1)(b) — Revision Petition — State Commission order setting aside District Forum order without hearing parties — Held to be illegal. India Law Library Docid # 2420381
(135) DR. HARISH GUPTA Vs. KUMARI KRITIKA AND OTHERS[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 21-11-2024 Consumer Protection Act, 2019 — Section 58(1)(b) — Revision Petition — Powers of National Commission — National Commission can set aside the order of the State Commission if no deficiency in service or medical negligence is found on the part of the Opposite Parties. India Law Library Docid # 2420382
(136) DCB BANK LIMITED Vs. MR. AJOY KUMAR MEHTA AND ANOTHER[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 19-11-2024 Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Section 2(d)(ii) and 2(o) — Consumer and Service — Definition of; Commercial Purpose — Overdraft facility for personal use, meeting children's educational expenses and regular affairs, not for profit generation, qualify for consumer protection, even if form indicated business purpose. India Law Library Docid # 2420377
(137) CHANDRAPRATAP SINGH BAIS Vs. PRAKRIYA PRABHARI (PROCESS IN-CHARGE) AND ANOTHER[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 19-11-2024 Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Section 17(1)(b) — Revisional Jurisdiction — Perversity of findings — Dismissal of appeals at admission stage — State Commission summarily dismissed appeals at admission stage — This is amenable to revisional jurisdiction if there are perversity, failure to exercise jurisdiction, or irregularities in the lower fora's decisions. India Law Library Docid # 2420378
(138) MOHD. MUKHTAR Vs. BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 18-11-2024 Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Section 21(b) — Revision Petition — Jurisdiction — National Commission's power to revise orders of State Commission. India Law Library Docid # 2420375
(139) AJAY KUMAR GUPTA Vs. BASUDEV AUTO LTD. AND OTHERS[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 18-11-2024 Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Sections 11, 15, 21(b) — Revisionary powers of National Commission — Scope and limitations — National Commission can only interfere if there is jurisdictional error, failure to exercise jurisdiction, or illegal/material irregularity in proceedings — Cannot interfere with concurrent findings of fact on appreciation of evidence unless there is perversity or illegality. India Law Library Docid # 2420376
(140) ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. Vs. M/S. HIND METALS & INDUSTRIES (P) LTD.[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 14-11-2024 Consumer Protection Act, 1986 Section 19 Appeal against State Commission order Allowed delay in filing appeal condoned in the interest of justice. India Law Library Docid # 2420374