(201) FAST ENGINEERS Vs. DEEPSHIKHA KALA SANSTHAN[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 21-11-2024 Consumer Protection Act, 2019 Section 51 Appeal against State Commission Order Appellant filed appeal against order allowing consumer complaint. India Law Library Docid # 2420379
(202) ABDUL GAGOOR Vs. JOSE K.V[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 21-11-2024 Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Section 21(b) — Revision Petition — Appeal against State Commission order reversing District Forum order — Parties referred to their original complaint roles — Complainant alleged defective construction and demanded refund — Opposite Party (OP) claimed delayed payments by complainant caused construction delays — District Forum directed both parties to fulfill obligations — State Commission allowed complainant's appeal, ordering OP to refund excess amount with inte India Law Library Docid # 2420380
(203) STATE BANK OF INDIA Vs. JAIPUR VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 21-11-2024 Consumer Protection Act, 2019 — Section 58(1)(b) — Revision Petition — State Commission order setting aside District Forum order without hearing parties — Held to be illegal. India Law Library Docid # 2420381
(204) DR. HARISH GUPTA Vs. KUMARI KRITIKA AND OTHERS[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 21-11-2024 Consumer Protection Act, 2019 — Section 58(1)(b) — Revision Petition — Powers of National Commission — National Commission can set aside the order of the State Commission if no deficiency in service or medical negligence is found on the part of the Opposite Parties. India Law Library Docid # 2420382
(205) DCB BANK LIMITED Vs. MR. AJOY KUMAR MEHTA AND ANOTHER[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 19-11-2024 Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Section 2(d)(ii) and 2(o) — Consumer and Service — Definition of; Commercial Purpose — Overdraft facility for personal use, meeting children's educational expenses and regular affairs, not for profit generation, qualify for consumer protection, even if form indicated business purpose. India Law Library Docid # 2420377
(206) CHANDRAPRATAP SINGH BAIS Vs. PRAKRIYA PRABHARI (PROCESS IN-CHARGE) AND ANOTHER[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 19-11-2024 Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Section 17(1)(b) — Revisional Jurisdiction — Perversity of findings — Dismissal of appeals at admission stage — State Commission summarily dismissed appeals at admission stage — This is amenable to revisional jurisdiction if there are perversity, failure to exercise jurisdiction, or irregularities in the lower fora's decisions. India Law Library Docid # 2420378
(207) MOHD. MUKHTAR Vs. BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 18-11-2024 Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Section 21(b) — Revision Petition — Jurisdiction — National Commission's power to revise orders of State Commission. India Law Library Docid # 2420375
(208) AJAY KUMAR GUPTA Vs. BASUDEV AUTO LTD. AND OTHERS[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 18-11-2024 Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Sections 11, 15, 21(b) — Revisionary powers of National Commission — Scope and limitations — National Commission can only interfere if there is jurisdictional error, failure to exercise jurisdiction, or illegal/material irregularity in proceedings — Cannot interfere with concurrent findings of fact on appreciation of evidence unless there is perversity or illegality. India Law Library Docid # 2420376
(209) ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. Vs. M/S. HIND METALS & INDUSTRIES (P) LTD.[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 14-11-2024 Consumer Protection Act, 1986 Section 19 Appeal against State Commission order Allowed delay in filing appeal condoned in the interest of justice. India Law Library Docid # 2420374
(210) M/S SEQUEL LOGISTICS PVT. LTD. Vs. SANWLI SHARMA AND OTHERS[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 13-11-2024 Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Section 2(1)(d) — Consumer — Appellant logistics company's agreement with Respondent No. 4 (stem cell company) explicitly stated that neither party could make commitments on behalf of the other, and were not liable for the other's actions. Respondent No. 4 therefore could not pass on liability to the Appellant to the Complainants, as the Complainants had no direct contractual relationship with the Appellant. This excluded the Appellant from being a necessary party India Law Library Docid # 2420373
(211) M/S. JAGDISH WOOLLEN'S (P) LTD. Vs. NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD.[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 11-11-2024 Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — FIR — Insurance Claim — Indemnity — Delay in settlement — Application of depreciation against reinstatement value — Calculation of claim amount — Role of surveyor's report — Court's power to examine surveyor's report — Necessity of second surveyor — Payment within specified period — Costs. India Law Library Docid # 2420371
(212) D PRABHU Vs. J. GOVINDARAJ[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 11-11-2024 Consumer Protection Act, 2019 — Section 69 — Condonation of Delay — Limitation period prescribed is a legislative command and must be strictly followed. India Law Library Docid # 2420372
(213) O.P. SRIVASTAVA Vs. MAHENDRA TANK AND ANOTHER[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 08-11-2024 Consumer Protection Act, 1986 & 2019 — Section 27 (1986 Act) / Section 72 (2019 Act) — Execution proceedings — Liability of former director — Appellant resigned as director before complaint was filed against the company — Apex Commission held that a former director who resigned before the consumer complaint was instituted cannot be held liable for the company's obligations or the execution of the decree — The State Commission erred in issuing warrants against the appellant ignoring documentary e India Law Library Docid # 2420370
(214) M/S. ROHIT EXTRACTIONS PVT. LTD. Vs. M/S. AMARDEEP PACKAGING[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 07-11-2024 Consumer Protection Act, 2019 Section 51 Appeal against State Commission Order Delay in filing appeal condoned for stated reasons. India Law Library Docid # 2420358
(215) NISHA T.S. Vs. BIOTECH PVT. LTD. AND OTHERS[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 07-11-2024 Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Section 19 — Appeal against State Commission's order — Delay in filing — Delay of 41 days condoned. India Law Library Docid # 2420359
(216) NEETA SINGH Vs. HDFC STANDARD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 07-11-2024 Consumer Protection Act, 2019 — Section 51(1) — Appeal against State Commission order — Condonation of delay — Delay in filing appeal was condoned based on reasons provided in the application. India Law Library Docid # 2420360
(217) M/S. NIRMAN REALTORS AND DEVELOPERS LTD AND OTHERS Vs. HARISH RATNAKAR NAIK AND OTHERS[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 07-11-2024 Consumer Protection — Delay in Filing Appeals — Condonation of Delay — Sufficient Cause — The appellant sought condonation of a 454-day delay in filing an appeal, citing the time taken to identify and consult legal counsel. India Law Library Docid # 2420361
(218) STATE BANK OF INDIA Vs. SHEETAL NAVNATH VAIDYA AND OTHERS[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 07-11-2024 Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Certain provisions — Deficiency in service — Failure to inform discontinuation of insurance cover — Bank's duty to inform borrower of discontinuation of insurance cover, especially when it was offered as part of loan agreement — Failure to provide personal notice constitutes deficiency in service. India Law Library Docid # 2420362
(219) DR. NAYAN THARA AND ANOTHER Vs. SUBAIDA[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 07-11-2024 Consumer Protection Act, 1986 Section 21(b) Revision Petition Medical Negligence Deficiency in Service Blood transfusion and Doctor's registration Court examined the evidence and arguments from both parties. India Law Library Docid # 2420363
(220) ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. Vs. RISHI WATCH CO.[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 07-11-2024 Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 21(b) — Revision Petition — Rehearing of evidence — Not permissible unless State Commission's order is illegal, arbitrary or perverse. India Law Library Docid # 2420364