India Law Library

User not Logged..

Lex AI Legal Document Intelligence Assistant

Latest Cases

First
«
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
»
Last

(41) THE JOINT DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS, CITY SURVEY SOUTH RANGE, K.R. CIRCLE AND OTHERS Vs. SRI. S VAZEER AHMED @ VAZEER PASHA AND OTHERS[KARNATAKA HIGH COURT] 06-07-2026
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 — Order 21 — Execution — Decree for specific performance — Property not forming subject-matter of suit or decree sought to be inducted at execution stage by unilateral insertion in schedule — Held, decree-holder cannot, without permission of Court and without any pleading or evidence in the suit, incorporate a property (here, CTS No.1047) into the
India Law Library Docid # 2447396

(42) RAVI KANT PATIL Vs. CHIEF MANAGER AND OTHERS[MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT] 06-07-2026
Constitution of India, 1950 — Article 226 — Judicial review of disciplinary proceedings — Scope — Held, High Court exercising power of judicial review under Art. 226 does not act as an Appellate Authority and cannot re-appreciate evidence recorded by the Disciplinary/Enquiry Authority — Jurisdiction
India Law Library Docid # 2447397

(43) SANJAY KUMAR GUPTA AND OTHERS Vs. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS[MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT] 06-07-2026
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 — Ss. 4, 6, 11 — Acquisition of land for expansion of Maihar temple facilities to accommodate pilgrim influx — Challenge on ground of alleged non-necessity of land — Held, necessity or otherwise of land for the purpose of acquisition is a disputed question of fact which cannot be adjudicated in exercise of writ jurisdiction under Art. 226 of the Constitution.
India Law Library Docid # 2447398

(44) SARDARI LAL Vs. BISHAN DASS AND OTHER[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 06-07-2026
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Section 100 — Second appeal — Scope of interference with concurrent findings on genuineness of a Will — Whether suspicious circumstances surrounding execution of a Will exist, and stand explained, is essentially a question of fact; a second appellate court cannot re-appreciate evidence and substitute its own view merely because another view is possible — Interference is permissible only where the finding is perverse, based on circumstances that are mere
India Law Library Docid # 2447390

(45) WHITE PAPER DESIGN PRIVATE LIMITED THROUGH MR ABHISHEK BANSAL DIRECTOR Vs. MR ROMI GARG AND OTHERS[DELHI HIGH COURT] 06-07-2026
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC)— Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 — Interim injunction — Specific performance of Agreement to Sell — Prima facie case — Where the plaintiff has paid over 94% of the total sale consideration under an Agreement to Sell (ATS), original title deeds stand delivered to him pursuant thereto, and he has demonstrated readiness and willingness to pay the balance, a prima facie case for grant of interim injunction is made out, notwithstanding the vendor's plea that
India Law Library Docid # 2447391

(46) GOURAVE GUPTA AND OTHERS Vs. LAXMI ROHRA AND ANOTHER[DELHI HIGH COURT] 06-07-2026
Specific Relief Act, 1963 — Sections 10 & 20 — Contract for sale of immovable property — Time as essence — Held, there is no presumption that time is of the essence of a contract for sale of immovable property; the question must be answered having regard to the express terms of the contract, the nature of the property, and the surrounding circumstances including the object of the parties in entering into the transaction — Even where time is not strictly of the essence,
India Law Library Docid # 2447392

(47) ABHIMANYU MISHRA AND OTHERS Vs. STATE OF ORISSA AND ANOTHER[ORISSA HIGH COURT] 06-07-2026
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Bail — SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 — Section 14-A — Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — Section 483 — Bail in appeal against refusal of bail — Grounds of arrest, non-communication of, in writing — Effect — Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 — Sections 103, 115(2), 126(2), 296, 109(1) — Assault leading to death arising from sudden
India Law Library Docid # 2447393

(48) DR. RAKESH KUMAR Vs. CHAUDHARY DEVI LAL UNIVERSITY AND ANOTHER[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 06-07-2026
Constitution of India, 1950 — Articles 226/227 — Writ of Mandamus — Prayer for regularization of services — Petitioner sought direction to regularize services as Assistant Professor (Law) on regular basis with consequential benefits — Petitioner appointed on contractual basis after selection process, possessing all UGC qualifications — Continuous service rendered for over 10 years performing duties
India Law Library Docid # 2447431

(49) SWARAJ PAL SINGH AND ANOTHER Vs. ARUN KUMAR AND OTHERS[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 06-07-2026
Transfer of Property Act, 1882 — Section 48 — Sale Deeds — Priority of Transfers — Where a property owner executes multiple sale deeds for the same property, the transfer that is prior in time generally takes precedence over subsequent transfers, provided the earlier sale deed is valid and the original owner had the right to
India Law Library Docid # 2447432

(50) CCL NXX (REAL NAME WITHHELD) Vs. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 06-07-2026
Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 — Sections 15, 18(3), 101 — Trial as adult — Preliminary assessment — Offence heinous, child aged 16 or above — Board must assess physical and mental capacity, understanding of consequences, and circumstances of offence — Order for trial as adult if conditions met, otherwise Board proceeds as summons case.
India Law Library Docid # 2447433

(51) KULDEEP KUMAR Vs. STATE OF HARYANA[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 06-07-2026
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Bail — Section 483, Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — Petitioner in custody for five months and twenty days, with clean antecedents — Investigation complete — FIR silent on petitioner's specific role and weapon used — Trial not likely to conclude soon — No risk of tampering
India Law Library Docid # 2447434

(52) SURMUKH SINGH AND OTHERS Vs. SMT. DEBO AND OTHERS[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 06-07-2026
Will Execution and Proof — A Will must be proved according to Section 63 of the Indian Succession Act and Section 68 of the Indian Evidence Act — Suspicious circumstances surrounding a Will's execution must be real and substantial — Examining one attesting witness is sufficient if they also prove the attestation of the
India Law Library Docid # 2447435

(53) M MURALI Vs. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH[ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT] 06-07-2026
Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act, 1987 — Section 83(2) — Withdrawal of original application (O.A.) with liberty to proceed under amended Act — Legality — Withdrawal permissible if it does not affect vested rights of parties — The Court can allow withdrawal with liberty to file a fresh suit if satisfied about a formal defect or sufficient grounds — Amending
India Law Library Docid # 2447436

(54) SAMEER KUMAR AND OTHERS Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND[JHARKHAND HIGH COURT] 06-07-2026
Penal Code, 1860 — Section 306 — Abetment of suicide — Ingredients — Conviction of husband for abetting suicide of wife who hanged herself at the matrimonial home, allegedly on account of his extra-marital relationship and matrimonial discord — Cross-appeals: one by the informant/brother of the deceased for enhancement of sentence, the other by the convicted husband for acquittal — Held, mere allegation of matrimonial discord, suspected infidelity, or a prior undertaking by the husband to mend h
India Law Library Docid # 2447443

(55) PAWAN KUMAR MANDAL Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND AND OTHERS[JHARKHAND HIGH COURT] 06-07-2026
Santhal Parganas Tenancy (Supplementary Provisions) Act, 1949 — Sections 4(ix), 5 and 6 — "Khas village" and "Pradhani village" — Distinction — Appointment of village headman/Pradhan — Hereditary succession v. election — Appellant claiming hereditary right to be appointed Pradhan of a village on the basis that his grandfather held the office some 50–60 years earlier — Divisional Commissioner having held the village to be a "Pradhani" village, attracting hereditary succession under S. 6 — Learned
India Law Library Docid # 2447444

(56) AMAR KUMAR CHOUDHARY Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND AND OTHERS[JHARKHAND HIGH COURT] 06-07-2026
Chhotanagpur Tenancy Act, 1908 — Section 71-A, proviso (2) — Restoration proceedings — Constructive res judicata — Limitation — Reasonable period — SAR case filed after 40 years from original transaction and second SAR case filed 19 years after order in first SAR case without challenging it — Held, barred by constructive res judicata and limitation — Appellate and revisional orders set aside — Original SAR order restored to finality — Constitution of India, Art. 226 — Writ of certiorari — Interf
India Law Library Docid # 2447445

(57) JUNAS PURTY @ JUNA Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND[JHARKHAND HIGH COURT] 06-07-2026
Penal Code, 1860 — S. 304 Part II — Culpable homicide not amounting to murder — Death caused by fist blows resulting in rupture of spleen and lung laceration without any external injury — Ocular evidence of eyewitnesses corroborated by medical evidence and dying declaration made to family members — Absence of external marks held not fatal to prosecution case where internal injuries and cause-effect chain established — Delay of three days in lodging FIR explained by prior Panchayat proceedings am
India Law Library Docid # 2447446

(58) PRAMILA DEVI Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND[JHARKHAND HIGH COURT] 06-07-2026
Penal Code, 1860 — Sections 307, 353, 412/34 — Arms Act, 1959 — Sections 25(1-B), 26, 27 — Criminal Law Amendment Act — Section 17 — Conviction based solely on presence of appellant, wife of an extremist, at place of encounter with extremist group — No overt act, no recovery of arms from her possession, no evidence of active membership of banned organisation — Held, mere presence at the place of occurrence coupled with marital relationship to a co-accused extremist insufficient to sustain convic
India Law Library Docid # 2447447

(59) STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Vs. DEVMUNIA AND OTHERS[CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT] 06-07-2026
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — Section 173 — Appeal against award — State government appealing an award fastening liability on it for a motor accident. The State argued it should not be liable as the vehicle was requisitioned. The Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the Tribunal's decision.
India Law Library Docid # 2447579

(60) CHHATTISGARH LOK AYOG Vs. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH AND OTHERS[CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT] 06-07-2026
Right to Information Act, 2005 — Section 8(1)(g) and 8(1)(h) — Chhattisgarh Lok Ayog Adhiniyam, 2002 — Section 14 — Information pertaining to ongoing investigations or enquiries — Information sought was regarding a complaint registered by the petitioner (Lok Ayog) concerning direct recruitment by Chhattisgarh Ayurvigyan Sansthan, and the subsequent proceedings and orders. The Public Information Officer
India Law Library Docid # 2447580

First
«
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
»
Last