(1) NAVNEET SUREKA AND OTHERS Vs. BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD G.E. PLAZA[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 27-05-2026 Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Section 21 — Insurance claim — Repudiation — Overseas Travel Policy — Complainant individually covered by an insurance schedule, making them a consumer despite employer paying premium — Employer's payment of medical expenses due to claim repudiation does not extinguish the India Law Library Docid # 2444379
(2) SMT. UMA TIWARI Vs. DR. SANTOSH GUPTA AND OTHERS[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 25-05-2026 Consumer Protection Act, 1986 & 2019 — Revision Petition — Scope of Revisional Jurisdiction — Limited to jurisdictional error, manifest material irregularity or illegality — High Court's findings on negligence binding on consumer forums — Cannot re-examine negligence after judicial intervention by High Court India Law Library Docid # 2444380
(3) AMARJIT SINGH MINHAS AND OTHERS Vs. JANTA LAND PROMOTERS LIMITED AND OTHERS[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 21-05-2026 Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Deficiency in Service — Delayed Possession of Property — Complainant sought possession, compensation for delay, setting aside of imposed penalty, and litigation costs — Builder cited 'force majeure' events for the delay — The Commission acknowledged the delay and directed payment of compensation as per the agreement, limited by the total compensation sought by the India Law Library Docid # 2444381
(4) SURESH BABU BOLLINENI AND ANOTHER Vs. M/S LODHA HEALTHY CONSTRUCTIONS & DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD. AND ANOTHER[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 20-05-2026 Consumer Protection Act, 1986 and 2019 — Pecuniary Jurisdiction — Consumer forums cannot invoke provisions of CPC like Order 7 Rule 10 & 10(A) for returning complaints as such powers are not conferred by the Act — If a forum lacks jurisdiction, it can only consign the complaint with liberty to approach the appropriate India Law Library Docid # 2444382
(5) M/S. J.P. EXPORTS Vs. NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD.[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 20-05-2026 Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Doctrine of Election — The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) noted that the complainant had first approached the IRDA and then the Appellate Authority under the Insurance Act, consciously electing to pursue remedies within the framework of the Insurance Act — India Law Library Docid # 2444383
(6) SMT. URMILA CHAND AND OTHERS Vs. DR. ATUL CHHABRA AND ANOTHER[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 18-05-2026 Consumer Protection Act, 2019 — Recusal of Bench — Repeated applications for recusal and transfer of case by complainant, seeking to avoid final hearing and manage proceedings, are rejected as lacking merit and being a tactic to prolong litigation. India Law Library Docid # 2444384
(7) VEER SINGH AND OTHERS Vs. DR. RAJEEV LOCHAN[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 18-05-2026 Medical Negligence — A surgeon's removal of a patient's healthy left kidney instead of the diseased right kidney, despite clear pre-operative diagnosis and imaging, constitutes gross medical negligence — The surgeon's explanation that it was impossible to remove the left kidney from a right-sided incision, coupled with the India Law Library Docid # 2444385
(8) HEART & GENERAL HOSPITAL Vs. MAMAN SINGH SHEKHAWAT AND OTHERS[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 18-05-2026 Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Medical Negligence — Appellant hospital held liable for 40% of the decretal amount for alleged medical negligence leading to patient's death — Patient admitted to appellant hospital in a critical condition after undergoing Cesarean Section and Hysterectomy at another hospital — Appellant India Law Library Docid # 2444386
(9) STATE BANK OF INDIA Vs. PROF. K.P. SREENATH[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 15-05-2026 Consumer Protection Act, 2019 — Section 51(2) — Second Appeal — Conversion of Revision Petition to Second Appeal — Condonation of Delay — admitted for consideration on substantial questions of law regarding bank's liability for third-party fraud and applicability of RBI Circular dated 06.07.2017. India Law Library Docid # 2444387
(10) M/S. KANGAN PALACE Vs. UNION BANK OF INDIA AND OTHERS[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 15-05-2026 Insurance Law — Fire Insurance Claim — Fraudulent Documents — Policy conditions, specifically regarding fraud and utmost good faith, are paramount — If a claim is found to be supported by fraudulent or manipulated documents, the entire claim can be forfeited, justifying the insurer's repudiation. India Law Library Docid # 2444388
(11) MEENAKSHI MISSION HOSPITAL AND RESEARCH CENTRE REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN AND TRUSTEE Vs. P.D. AUDIKESAVALU REP. BY POA KAVITHA AUDIKESAVALU[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 14-05-2026 Consumer Protection Act, 2019 — Section 62 — Transfer Application — Grounds for transfer — Apprehension of bias due to litigant's status as a High Court Judge — Held, mere status of litigant as a constitutional functionary cannot by itself constitute a ground for transfer unless supported by cogent material establishing a real India Law Library Docid # 2444389
(12) VINOD KUMAR KUCHHAL Vs. TDI INFRASTRUCTURES LTD.[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 13-05-2026 Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Review Application and Miscellaneous Application to modify an order — The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dismissed both a Review Application (RA) and a Miscellaneous Application (MA) seeking modification of a previous order — The India Law Library Docid # 2444390
(13) THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LIMITED Vs. MR. HEERALAL CHAMPAWAT[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 12-05-2026 Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Section 21(b) — Revisional jurisdiction of National Commission is limited and should be exercised only when State Commission has acted without jurisdiction, failed to exercise jurisdiction, or acted illegally or with material irregularity — National Commission cannot interfere with concurrent India Law Library Docid # 2444391
(14) SOMANI KANAK SEEDZ PVT. LTD. Vs. JASWANT SINGH AND OTHERS[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 12-05-2026 Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Section 13(1)(c) — Defective Seeds — Burden of Proof — Complainant must provide expert evidence or laboratory testing to prove defects in seeds, especially concerning quality and taste, as per the Act — Mere non-recommendation by an agricultural university or variations in yield compared to other India Law Library Docid # 2444392
(15) STATE BANK OF INDIA AND OTHERS Vs. VINAY KUMAR AND ANOTHER[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 11-05-2026 Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Deficiency in Service — Loss of Title Deed — Bank lost original title deed of respondent's mortgaged property which was returned after closure of loan — Bank admitted loss and offered certified copy, but respondent filed complaint — State Commission directed Bank to return original deed or pay Rs India Law Library Docid # 2444393
(16) SMT. MAHINDRA DEVI OSTWAL Vs. DR. SANDEEP KOTHARI AND OTHERS[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 11-05-2026 Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Medical Negligence — Complaint alleging negligence in cataract surgery leading to loss of eyesight — State Commission dismissed the complaint, finding no negligence and attributing the complication to an external cause — Appeal filed before the National Commission. India Law Library Docid # 2444394
(17) DR. THOMAS V. THOMAS Vs. LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 11-05-2026 Review Application — Powers of Commission — The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission has the power to review its own orders if there is an error apparent on the face of the record, as per Section 60 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, or Section 22(2) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, applicable to India Law Library Docid # 2444395
(18) MEGHA VERMA Vs. IBT INSTITUTE PVT. LTD. AND OTHERS[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 08-05-2026 Consumer Protection Act, 2019 — Section 51(2) — Revision Petition vs. Appeal — A revision petition cannot be automatically converted into an appeal, as an appeal under Section 51(2) requires a substantial question of law, whereas a revision petition does not have this prerequisite — The court may, however, treat a compilation as an appeal if substantial questions of law are proposed and argued. India Law Library Docid # 2444396
(19) DEEP SEA RESORT ANDAMAN PRIVATE LIMITED Vs. ANDAMAN AND NICOBAR STATE COOPERATIVE BANK LIMITED[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 23-04-2026 Consumer Protection Act, 2019 — Pecuniary Jurisdiction — Repayment of loan amounts does not constitute consideration paid for services rendered by the bank for determining pecuniary jurisdiction — Only amounts paid to avail bank services, like loan processing charges, can be considered. India Law Library Docid # 2444397
(20) MOHINDER PAL SINGH Vs. PAN REALTORS PRIVATE LIMITED[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 23-04-2026 Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Section 21 — Deficiency in Service — Delayed Possession — Builder failed to deliver possession of housing units within the agreed timeline, including the grace period — Offer of possession without a valid India Law Library Docid # 2444398