India Law Library

User not Logged..

Lex AI Legal Document Intelligence Assistant

Latest Cases

First
«
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
»
Last

(421) CHAITANYA BAHUUDDESHIYA SHIKSHAN PRASARAK MANDAL AND OTHERS Vs. AUXILO FINSERVE PVT. LTD. AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 22-04-2026
Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (SARFAESI Act), Section 13 — Default in repayment of financial assistance — Secured creditor entitled to take possession and auction secured asset (School premises) — Petitioners repeatedly failed to honour commitments and undertakings to repay debt, even after High Court and Supreme Court orders —
India Law Library Docid # 2442600

(422) UNCHGAON VILLAGE PANCHAYAT Vs. KOLHAPUR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ANOTHER[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 22-04-2026
Jurisdiction of Civil Court — Challenge to Municipal Limits — Matters concerning the specification and alteration of municipal limits under Section 3 of the Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act, 1949, are legislative in nature and cannot ordinarily be adjudicated by a Civil Court through a suit seeking declarations and injunctions — The High Court correctly held that the Civil Court lacked jurisdiction
India Law Library Docid # 2442601

(423) UNION OF INDIA Vs. SIR SOBHA SINGH AND SONS PVT. LTD[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 22-04-2026
Government Grants Act, 1895 — Section 3 — Tenor of Grant — Overriding Effect — The Government Grants Act, 1895, and specifically Section 3, mandates that Government grants take effect according to their tenor, overriding any other rule of law, statute, or enactment to the contrary — This provision confers special statutory immunity and elevates the stipulations within the grant to a position of supremacy, meaning the terms of the grant prevail even if they are inconsistent with
India Law Library Docid # 2442602

(424) THE SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF TAMIL NADU, AND OTHERS ETC. Vs. S. RAJA AND OTHERS ETC[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 22-04-2026
Public Interest Litigation and Administrative Inquiry — Scope of judicial review — Initially, a Public Interest Litigation sought an inquiry into alleged encroachments and illegal land transactions — The government formed a committee, leading to the High Court disposing of the PIL, finding its objective achieved — The builder's challenge to the inquiry was also dismissed by the High Court, stating it was too early
India Law Library Docid # 2442603

(425) ADALAT YADAV ETC. Vs. THE STATE OF BIHAR[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 22-04-2026
Evidence Act, 1872 — Section 134 — Weightage of evidence — Court can convict on the sole testimony of a single eyewitness provided he is wholly reliable — The quality of evidence, not the quantity, is material — A 'sterling witness' is one whose version is unassailable, consistent, natural, and withstands strenuous cross — examination, correlating with supporting material.
India Law Library Docid # 2442604

(426) RAJENDRA SINGH BORA Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 22-04-2026
Dispute over cadre change versus mere transfer — A transfer is a change of posting within the same service without altering seniority or substantive status, differing from a cadre change which involves a structural shift between services with significant implications for seniority and promotional avenues, requiring specific authority.
India Law Library Docid # 2442605

(427) V.MALAR Vs. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, MADURAI DISTRICT, MADURAI AND OTHERS[MADRAS HIGH COURT (MADURAI BENCH)] 22-04-2026
Constitution of India, 1950 — Article 300A — Right to Property — Though not a fundamental right, it's a valuable constitutional right, and no one can be deprived of property except by the authority of law.
India Law Library Docid # 2442606

(428) DALEL SINGH Vs. STATE OF H.P.[HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 22-04-2026
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 — Section 397 — Revisional Jurisdiction — Scope — Revisional court is not an appellate court; its jurisdiction is to rectify patent defects, errors of jurisdiction, or law, not to re-appreciate evidence or substitute its own view for that of the lower courts unless the decision is grossly erroneous, based on no evidence, material evidence is ignored
India Law Library Docid # 2442707

(429) LEKH RAJ (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH LRS Vs. KAMAL KUMAR[HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 22-04-2026
Transfer of Property Act, 1882 — Section 106 — Notice to quit — Validity — Lease of immovable property other than for agricultural or manufacturing purposes is a month-to-month lease terminable by fifteen days' notice. The period of notice commences from the date of receipt of notice. A notice is not invalid merely because the period mentioned falls short of fifteen days
India Law Library Docid # 2442712

(430) ER. SURINDER SHARMA Vs. H.P. MICRO SMALL ENTERPRISES FACILITATION COUNCIL AND ANOTHER[HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 22-04-2026
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Section 34(3) — Application for setting aside arbitral award — Limitation — Condonation of delay — Applicant filed prior petitions under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution which were dismissed as not maintainable, holding that the remedy under Section 34 of the Act was appropriate — Present application for condonation of delay in filing objections under Section 34 was filed significantly after the expiry of the stipulated three-month period and the furt
India Law Library Docid # 2442713

(431) KAMLESH SHARMA AND ANOTHER Vs. HRTC AND ANOTHER[HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 22-04-2026
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — Section 166 — Motor accident claims — Compensation for death of son — Claimants are parents of deceased — Deceased was pillion rider on motorcycle which was hit by offending vehicle — FIR registered and postmortem conducted
India Law Library Docid # 2442714

(432) DINESH KUMAR Vs. POONAM VERMA[HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 22-04-2026
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 — Order 22 Rules 3 and 9 — Abatement of suit on death of a plaintiff — Suit for possession and injunction — Where there are multiple plaintiffs, death of one plaintiff does not cause the suit to abate if the right to sue survives to the remaining plaintiff — Dismissal of an application to bring legal heirs on record does not automatically abate the entire suit if a surviving plaintiff remains — Supreme Court judgments in Siravarapu Appa Rao vs. Dokala Appa Rao, Sakhara
India Law Library Docid # 2442715

(433) AMAR CHAND (DECEASED) THROUGH LRS Vs. BANARSI DASS AND OTHERS[HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 22-04-2026
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Order 41 Rule 27 — Additional evidence — Handwriting expert opinion — Application seeking to summon a handwriting expert to exhibit his opinion on signatures in a Will — Report obtained after trial and appellate courts had decided — No explanation for delay in obtaining and producing the report — Held, additional evidence can only be led under specific circumstances, including due
India Law Library Docid # 2442744

(434) HARSH Vs. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS[MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT (INDORE BENCH)] 22-04-2026
Constitution of India, 1950 — Article 226 — Custodial Violence — Petitioner claimed to have been assaulted by police constables and his mobile phone snatched and video deleted — Court noted the lack of CCTV footage and the police's admission of taking the petitioner to an area without cameras, drawing an adverse inference against the police
India Law Library Docid # 2442790

(435) M/S. SSANGYONG ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION COMPANY LTD. Vs. M/S. S.B. ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES A PARTNERSHIP FIRM[MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT] 22-04-2026
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Section 2(1)(f), 11(9), 11(12) — International Commercial Arbitration — Appointment of Arbitrator — Where one party is a foreign company, the arbitration is an International Commercial Arbitration — Only the Chief Justice of India or their designate has jurisdiction to appoint an arbitrator — High Court lacks jurisdiction; appointment by High Court is void ab initio and a nullity.
India Law Library Docid # 2442791

(436) ARPIT CHOUREY Vs. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH[MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT] 22-04-2026
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 36 — Police Act, 1861 — Section 12 and Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 307, 294 and 34 — Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 482 — Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023 — Sections 64(1), 331(4), 332(B), 127(2), 75(1)(i), 351(3) and 331(2) — Parallel Enquiry during Investigation — A separate or parallel inquiry conducted by another authority during an
India Law Library Docid # 2442792

(437) GHULAM NABI BHAT AND OTHERS Vs. UNION OF INDIA THROUGH SECRETARY DEFENCE, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, NEW DELHI AND OTHERS[JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH HIGH COURT (SRINAGAR BENCH)] 22-04-2026
Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants) Act, 1971 — Section 5A(2) — Summary eviction proceedings — Not suitable for adjudication of complicated questions of title — If there is a bona fide dispute regarding title, government cannot take a unilateral decision and resort to summary remedy for eviction.
India Law Library Docid # 2442976

(438) THE KRISHNA DISTRICT ADMINISTRATION AND OTHERS Vs. SRI ANJANEYA SWAMY VARI TELMPLE[ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT] 22-04-2026
Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act, 1987 — Applicability to Private Trust Temples — Held that if a temple is a private family temple and is exempted from the provisions of the Endowments Act, then the Act and its regulations will not apply to it or its properties.
India Law Library Docid # 2443130

(439) THE STATE OF A.P Vs. THAMBISETTY RAMPRASAD ANOTHER[ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT] 22-04-2026
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 378 — Appeal against acquittal — Appellate court’s powers — Appellate court can review, re-appreciate and reconsider evidence, and reach its own conclusions on facts and law — However, if two reasonable conclusions are possible, the appellate court should not disturb the acquittal — Interference is justified only if the trial court's view is not a "possible
India Law Library Docid # 2443172

(440) THE INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD., HYDERABAD AND OTHERS Vs. DURGA PUJARI SURI BABU[ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT] 22-04-2026
Contract Law — Dealership Agreement — Breach of Terms — Termination of Dealership — Distributor appointed under social objective category for marginalized sections was found to be in employment and had inducted partners without prior Corporation approval, leading to termination — The Court considered if these actions
India Law Library Docid # 2443173

First
«
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
»
Last