India Law Library

User not Logged..

Lex AI Legal Document Intelligence Assistant

Latest Cases

First
«
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
»
Last

(681) AMIT KUMAR SINGH Vs. SMT. ASHRAF BANO AND OTHERS[CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT] 13-04-2026
Review Jurisdiction — Grounds for Review — Errors apparent on the face of the record — Specific performance of contract suit — Dismissal on grounds of limitation and insufficient court fee — Plaintiff's claim for protection of possession under Section 53-A of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, not a valid ground for review when not raised
India Law Library Docid # 2442344

(682) SUPERB INFOTECH PVT. LTD. Vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, FARIDABAD.[RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT (JAIPUR BENCH)] 13-04-2026
Income Tax Act, 1961 — Section 153C — Proceedings initiated without incriminating material — For proceedings under Section 153C to be valid, there must be incriminating material found during a search that pertains to the assessee — In this case, the satisfaction note only mentioned documents like Partnership Deed and Dissolution Deed, but did not indicate any income concealment related to the
India Law Library Docid # 2442676

(683) MAHESH TIWARI Vs. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN[RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT (JAIPUR BENCH)] 13-04-2026
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 — Section 138 — Dishonour of cheque — Defence of disputed signature — Accused facing trial for offence under Section 138 of the Act, claimed he never issued the cheque and disputed its signature from the beginning — Application under Section 45 of Indian Evidence Act for FSL examination of signature submitted at the stage of recording accused's evidence —
India Law Library Docid # 2442677

(684) FEDERATION OF PRIVATE MEDICAL AND DENTAL COLLEGE OF RAJASTHAN Vs. CHAIRMAN, NEET PG MEDICAL AND DENTAL AND OTHERS[RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT] 13-04-2026
Constitution of India, 1950 — Articles 15(5), 341, 342, 342A, 366(24), 366(25), 366(26C) — Reservation — State-specific nature of — Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, Backward Classes are notified state-wise, in relation to each individual State, based on unique socio-economic and cultural realities of that region — Benefits of reservation confined to categories notified in relation to a particular State and cannot be extended to members recognized as reserved category in another State — Held,
India Law Library Docid # 2442643

(685) TAKHAT SINGH Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND OTHERS[RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT] 13-04-2026
Rajasthan Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 2017 — Rule 28(2)(xvii)(a) and Schedule IV — Termination of Mining Lease — Mandatory 30-day notice — Proper interpretation requires the notice to be issued immediately before the decision to terminate, not earlier — Initial notices outlining possible consequences are insufficient for this terminal notice — Termination is a drastic step and requires a
India Law Library Docid # 2442644

(686) ASHIK KUMAR Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS[RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT] 13-04-2026
Constitution of India, 1950 — Article 226 & 227 — Writ Petition — Appointment — Age Relaxation — Petitioner challenged the selection of Respondent No — 4 for the post of Telephone Operator Grade-II in Indian Air Force, alleging he was overage as per advertisement — Respondent No — 4 was granted age relaxation under the Residents of Jammu and Kashmir (Relaxation of Upper Age Limit) Rules, 1997,
India Law Library Docid # 2442645

(687) PRIYANKA PILANIA Vs. THE HIGH COURT FOR JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN[RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT] 13-04-2026
Constitution of India, 1950 — Article 226 — Judicial Review of Administrative Action — APAR Entries — Interference warranted if decision-making process is arbitrary, based on irrelevant or extraneous material, violative of natural justice, or suffers from non-application of mind — Such principles guide adjudication of APAR disputes.
India Law Library Docid # 2442646

(688) MASRIBHAI DESABHAI AND OTHERS Vs. STATE OF GUJARAT AND OTHERS[GUJARAT HIGH COURT] 13-04-2026
Bombay Land Revenue Code, 1879 — Section 68 — Land Allotment and Transfer — Challenge to orders confiscating land — Petitioner purchased land via registered sale deed in 1980 — Proceedings initiated in 2002 for alleged breach of conditions — Delayed initiation of suo motu proceedings without reasonable time is impermissible.
India Law Library Docid # 2443480

(689) PATEL RATILAL BHAVANBHAI DOBARIYA AND OTHERS Vs. STATE OF GUJARAT AND OTHERS[GUJARAT HIGH COURT] 13-04-2026
Gujarat Land Revenue Code — Suo Motu Powers — Exercise of revisional powers by Collector after a lapse of 27 years from the certification of revenue entries is beyond a reasonable period and therefore unsustainable in law.
India Law Library Docid # 2443481

(690) ARVIND KUMAR R Vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA[KARNATAKA HIGH COURT] 11-04-2026
Karnataka Protection of Interest of Depositors in Financial Establishments Act, 2004 (KPIDFE Act) — Addition of Offences — While Section 9 of the KPIDFE Act may bar the grant of anticipatory bail, this bar applies at the time of the initial registration of the crime — If the KPIDFE Act is invoked later, and anticipatory bail was already granted based on the initial charges, the earlier anticipatory bail order remains valid until cancelled through due process.
India Law Library Docid # 2442150

(691) MAMTA DEVI Vs. SANJAY KUMAR[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 10-04-2026
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 — Section 13(1)(ia) and 13(1)(ib) — Divorce granted on grounds of cruelty and desertion — Both Family Court and High Court found evidence of cruelty and desertion by the appellant-wife — Appeal dismissed.
India Law Library Docid # 2442108

(692) HARI RAM Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 10-04-2026
Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955 — Section 88 — Khatedari rights — Claim for declaration of Khatedari rights and recovery of land unlawfully encroached upon — Trial Court decreed suit based on plaintiff's inherited Khatedari rights from his father — Defendant contested case, later declared ex-parte — Appeal filed after significant delay rejected — Second appeal remanded by Board of Revenue, affirmed by High Court — Supreme Court held that original authority provided no opportunity to
India Law Library Docid # 2442109

(693) DHAN JEE PANDEY Vs. THE STATE OF BIHAR AND ANOTHER[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 10-04-2026
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 389 — Suspension of sentence pending appeal — Suspension of sentence in serious offences should not be granted routinely — Appellate court must apply its mind to the nature of the offence, manner of commission, and gravity of trial court's findings — Reasons must be recorded in writing, reflecting due consideration of relevant factors — Order granting suspension
India Law Library Docid # 2442110

(694) THE STATE OF KERALA Vs. M. VIJAYAKUMAR AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 10-04-2026
Constitution of India, 1950 — Article 14 — Equality before law — Dearness Allowance (DA) and Dearness Relief (DR) — Sanctioning different rates of enhancement for DA for serving employees and DR for pensioners, when both are intended to mitigate inflation, is discriminatory and violates Article 14.
India Law Library Docid # 2442111

(695) KAMAL PRASAD DUBEY Vs. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 10-04-2026
Contitution of India — Articles 14 & 16 — Equality in employment — Denial of promotion on discriminatory grounds — Appellant denied promotion despite long service, experience, and possessing a qualification that was accepted for similarly situated employees — High Court Division Bench erroneously set aside Single Judge’s order granting relief, creating contradiction in reasoning by first stating discretion lies with Board of Directors and then upholding Registrar’s refusal — Supreme Court allowe
India Law Library Docid # 2442112

(696) POONAM DWIVEDI AND OTHERS Vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 10-04-2026
Uttar Pradesh Public Services (Reservation for Economically Weaker Sections) Act, 2020 — Advertisement dated 15.12.2021 for 9212 posts of Health Worker (Female) — Economically Weaker Section (EWS) reservation — Clause 8.3 of advertisement requiring candidates to submit EWS certificate issued till the last date
India Law Library Docid # 2442113

(697) SRI M.V. RAMACHANDRASA SINCE DECEASED REPRESENTED BY LEGAL HEIRS Vs. M/S. MAHENDRA WATCH COMPANY REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNERS AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 10-04-2026
Karnataka Rent Act, 1999 — Section 46 — Revisional jurisdiction of High Court — Scope — High Court cannot re-appreciate evidence or substitute its own findings for those of the trial court — Revisional power is supervisory and limited to examining legality, correctness, or propriety of an order, not to act as a court of first appeal — Interference is warranted only for perversity, lack of evidence, or manifest illegality. [Paras 12.1 to 12.9]
India Law Library Docid # 2442114

(698) RAM CHANDRA CHOUDHARY AND OTHERS Vs. ROOP NAGAR DUGDH UTPADAK SAHAKARI SAMITI LIMITED AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 10-04-2026
Rajasthan Co-operative Societies Act, 2001 — Section 32, Section 8 read with Schedule B — Bye-laws framed by District Milk Producers' Co-operative Unions — Validity — Election to Management Committee — Eligibility criteria — Held, bye-laws are valid as they operate within the statutory scheme and are traceable to the
India Law Library Docid # 2442115

(699) NITENDRA KUMAR TOMER, SUSPENDED DIRECTOR, AMBRO ASIA PRIVATE LIMITED Vs. UNOX S.P.A. AND ANOTHER[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 10-04-2026
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 — Section 62, Section 9, Section 16(3), Section 17(1)(a), Section 61(2) — Appeal against admission of application under Section 9 — Competency of appeal filed by suspended director — After admission of Section 9 application, management vests in Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) —
India Law Library Docid # 2442230

(700) MILIND S/O ASHRUBA DHANVE AND OTHERS Vs. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 10-04-2026
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Sections 323, 324 read with Section 34 — Conviction and sentence upheld by High Court — Appeal to Supreme Court limited to seeking benefit of Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 (1958 Act) — Appellants contended that the Act is a beneficial legislation and its object is reformative, not punitive — Argued for release after admonition or on probation of good conduct — State argued that conviction and sentence do not warrant interference and benefit of 1958 Act is sought
India Law Library Docid # 2442231

First
«
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
»
Last