India Law Library

User not Logged..

Lex AI Legal Document Intelligence Assistant

Latest Cases

First
«
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
»
Last

(341) ASHISH KUMAR CHATTERJEE Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS[CALCUTTA HIGH COURT] 22-04-2026
Constitution of India, 1950 — Article 226/227 — Writ of Certiorari — High Court's power is supervisory, not appellate — Does not review or reweigh evidence — Demolishes orders without jurisdiction or palpably erroneous — Does not substitute its own views — Refuses to upset illegal orders for substantial justice and equitable considerations.
India Law Library Docid # 2442611

(342) SAKIL HOSSAIN Vs. THE STATE OF TRIPURA[TRIPURA HIGH COURT] 22-04-2026
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 — Section 37 — Bail — Recovery of Commercial Quantity — Application for bail was rejected because there were sufficient prima facie materials indicating the recovery of a commercial quantity of contraband from the accused, which meant that the twin conditions under Section 37 of the NDPS Act were not fulfilled for granting bail.
India Law Library Docid # 2442612

(343) GHULAM NABI ALLAIE AND OTHERS Vs. UNION TERRITORY OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND OTHERS[JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH HIGH COURT (SRINAGAR BENCH)] 22-04-2026
Land Acquisition — Compensation — Government cannot dispossess citizens of their private property without following due process of law or paying adequate compensation, even if there is a delay in the landowner approaching the court — The right to property is a constitutional and human right, and the absence of a formal acquisition process or compensation for the occupied land means the state cannot deny the owner's claim.
India Law Library Docid # 2442613

(344) RIJIED NONGPHLANG Vs. THE STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND OTHERS[MEGHALAYA HIGH COURT] 22-04-2026
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 173(8) — Further investigation — Procedure for filing supplementary charge sheet — Seizure and production of birth certificate of victim at a late stage of trial without following due procedure and without filing a supplementary charge sheet with advance notice to the accused is irregular and can cause prejudice.
India Law Library Docid # 2442614

(345) V.MALAR Vs. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, MADURAI DISTRICT, MADURAI AND OTHERS[MADRAS HIGH COURT (MADURAI BENCH)] 22-04-2026
Constitution of India, 1950 — Article 300A — Right to Property — Though not a fundamental right, it's a valuable constitutional right, and no one can be deprived of property except by the authority of law.
India Law Library Docid # 2442606

(346) DALEL SINGH Vs. STATE OF H.P.[HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 22-04-2026
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 — Section 397 — Revisional Jurisdiction — Scope — Revisional court is not an appellate court; its jurisdiction is to rectify patent defects, errors of jurisdiction, or law, not to re-appreciate evidence or substitute its own view for that of the lower courts unless the decision is grossly erroneous, based on no evidence, material evidence is ignored
India Law Library Docid # 2442707

(347) LEKH RAJ (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH LRS Vs. KAMAL KUMAR[HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 22-04-2026
Transfer of Property Act, 1882 — Section 106 — Notice to quit — Validity — Lease of immovable property other than for agricultural or manufacturing purposes is a month-to-month lease terminable by fifteen days' notice. The period of notice commences from the date of receipt of notice. A notice is not invalid merely because the period mentioned falls short of fifteen days
India Law Library Docid # 2442712

(348) ER. SURINDER SHARMA Vs. H.P. MICRO SMALL ENTERPRISES FACILITATION COUNCIL AND ANOTHER[HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 22-04-2026
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Section 34(3) — Application for setting aside arbitral award — Limitation — Condonation of delay — Applicant filed prior petitions under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution which were dismissed as not maintainable, holding that the remedy under Section 34 of the Act was appropriate — Present application for condonation of delay in filing objections under Section 34 was filed significantly after the expiry of the stipulated three-month period and the furt
India Law Library Docid # 2442713

(349) KAMLESH SHARMA AND ANOTHER Vs. HRTC AND ANOTHER[HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 22-04-2026
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — Section 166 — Motor accident claims — Compensation for death of son — Claimants are parents of deceased — Deceased was pillion rider on motorcycle which was hit by offending vehicle — FIR registered and postmortem conducted
India Law Library Docid # 2442714

(350) DINESH KUMAR Vs. POONAM VERMA[HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 22-04-2026
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 — Order 22 Rules 3 and 9 — Abatement of suit on death of a plaintiff — Suit for possession and injunction — Where there are multiple plaintiffs, death of one plaintiff does not cause the suit to abate if the right to sue survives to the remaining plaintiff — Dismissal of an application to bring legal heirs on record does not automatically abate the entire suit if a surviving plaintiff remains — Supreme Court judgments in Siravarapu Appa Rao vs. Dokala Appa Rao, Sakhara
India Law Library Docid # 2442715

(351) AMAR CHAND (DECEASED) THROUGH LRS Vs. BANARSI DASS AND OTHERS[HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 22-04-2026
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Order 41 Rule 27 — Additional evidence — Handwriting expert opinion — Application seeking to summon a handwriting expert to exhibit his opinion on signatures in a Will — Report obtained after trial and appellate courts had decided — No explanation for delay in obtaining and producing the report — Held, additional evidence can only be led under specific circumstances, including due
India Law Library Docid # 2442744

(352) HARSH Vs. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS[MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT (INDORE BENCH)] 22-04-2026
Constitution of India, 1950 — Article 226 — Custodial Violence — Petitioner claimed to have been assaulted by police constables and his mobile phone snatched and video deleted — Court noted the lack of CCTV footage and the police's admission of taking the petitioner to an area without cameras, drawing an adverse inference against the police
India Law Library Docid # 2442790

(353) M/S. SSANGYONG ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION COMPANY LTD. Vs. M/S. S.B. ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES A PARTNERSHIP FIRM[MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT] 22-04-2026
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Section 2(1)(f), 11(9), 11(12) — International Commercial Arbitration — Appointment of Arbitrator — Where one party is a foreign company, the arbitration is an International Commercial Arbitration — Only the Chief Justice of India or their designate has jurisdiction to appoint an arbitrator — High Court lacks jurisdiction; appointment by High Court is void ab initio and a nullity.
India Law Library Docid # 2442791

(354) ARPIT CHOUREY Vs. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH[MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT] 22-04-2026
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 36 — Police Act, 1861 — Section 12 and Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 307, 294 and 34 — Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 482 — Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023 — Sections 64(1), 331(4), 332(B), 127(2), 75(1)(i), 351(3) and 331(2) — Parallel Enquiry during Investigation — A separate or parallel inquiry conducted by another authority during an
India Law Library Docid # 2442792

(355) GHULAM NABI BHAT AND OTHERS Vs. UNION OF INDIA THROUGH SECRETARY DEFENCE, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, NEW DELHI AND OTHERS[JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH HIGH COURT (SRINAGAR BENCH)] 22-04-2026
Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants) Act, 1971 — Section 5A(2) — Summary eviction proceedings — Not suitable for adjudication of complicated questions of title — If there is a bona fide dispute regarding title, government cannot take a unilateral decision and resort to summary remedy for eviction.
India Law Library Docid # 2442976

(356) THE KRISHNA DISTRICT ADMINISTRATION AND OTHERS Vs. SRI ANJANEYA SWAMY VARI TELMPLE[ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT] 22-04-2026
Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act, 1987 — Applicability to Private Trust Temples — Held that if a temple is a private family temple and is exempted from the provisions of the Endowments Act, then the Act and its regulations will not apply to it or its properties.
India Law Library Docid # 2443130

(357) THE STATE OF A.P Vs. THAMBISETTY RAMPRASAD ANOTHER[ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT] 22-04-2026
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 378 — Appeal against acquittal — Appellate court’s powers — Appellate court can review, re-appreciate and reconsider evidence, and reach its own conclusions on facts and law — However, if two reasonable conclusions are possible, the appellate court should not disturb the acquittal — Interference is justified only if the trial court's view is not a "possible
India Law Library Docid # 2443172

(358) THE INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD., HYDERABAD AND OTHERS Vs. DURGA PUJARI SURI BABU[ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT] 22-04-2026
Contract Law — Dealership Agreement — Breach of Terms — Termination of Dealership — Distributor appointed under social objective category for marginalized sections was found to be in employment and had inducted partners without prior Corporation approval, leading to termination — The Court considered if these actions
India Law Library Docid # 2443173

(359) SARADA METALS AND ALLOYS LTD. Vs. A.P. ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION[ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT] 22-04-2026
Electricity Act, 2003 — Section 86(4) and Section 61 — National Electricity Policy and Tariff Policy — "Shall be guided" interpretation — State Electricity Regulatory Commissions are autonomous and have the primary authority to frame regulations, including those on Renewable Power Purchase Obligations (RPO) — While they must be guided by the National Electricity Policy and Tariff Policy, these
India Law Library Docid # 2443174

(360) THANNEERU HARISH RAO AND OTHERS Vs. THE STATE OF TELANGANA, GENERAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, HYDERABAD, REP. BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY AND OTHERS.[TELANGANA HIGH COURT] 22-04-2026
Commissions of Inquiry Act, 1952 — Section 3 — Constitution of a Commission of Inquiry — Held, not arbitrary, illegal, unconstitutional, or ultra vires the Act, since the dominant purpose was to inquire into negligence, irregularities, and lacunae in the construction of barrages, identify lapses, and fix responsibility, without pre-judging guilt.
India Law Library Docid # 2443322

First
«
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
»
Last