India Law Library

User not Logged..

Lex AI Legal Document Intelligence Assistant

Latest Cases

First
«
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
»
Last

(381) SHEETAL DASS AND OTHERS Vs. UNION OF INDIA[HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 25-02-2026
Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 — Section 34 — Offences by companies — Vicarious liability — Directors and persons in charge of business — Complaint must contain specific averments detailing how the accused was in charge of and responsible for the company's business, not just a bald statement of their position
India Law Library Docid # 2440477

(382) KESHAV CHANDEL AND OTHERS Vs. STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AND OTHERS[HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 25-02-2026
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) — Section 528 — Indian Penal Code (IPC) Sections 126(2), 190, 191(2), 191(3) and 115(2) — Quashing of FIR and subsequent proceedings on basis of compromise — Offence not heinous or involving moral turpitude — Compromise entered into between parties — Continuation of
India Law Library Docid # 2440478

(383) STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH Vs. CHANDERBHAN AND OTHERS[HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 25-02-2026
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Sections 323, 325, 34 — Appeal against acquittal — High Court can only interfere with an acquittal if the judgment is perverse, based on misreading or omission of material evidence, or if no two reasonable views are possible. The trial court's assessment that there was a delay in reporting the incident
India Law Library Docid # 2440479

(384) SANTOKH SINGH Vs. BALDEEP SINGH[HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 25-02-2026
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 — Section 138 — Dishonour of cheque — Conviction — Revisional Court’s scope — A revisional court cannot re-appreciate evidence or substitute its own findings for those of the lower courts unless there is a patent defect, an error of jurisdiction, or a perversity in the decision.
India Law Library Docid # 2440480

(385) VISHAL SHARMA Vs. DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT OFFICE (ED)[HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 25-02-2026
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) — Section 483 — Interim bail — Applicant sought interim bail on the ground of his sister-in-law's death and to be with his family — Court considered the death and applicant's need to mourn, granting ten days interim bail — Previous grant of interim bail was not misused — Conditions
India Law Library Docid # 2440481

(386) RAJ KUMAR Vs. STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH[HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 25-02-2026
Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) — Section 483 — Regular bail — Petitioner lodged FIR against for sexual assault — Allegations of victim voluntarily boarding petitioner's car and falsely implicating him for monetary gain — No medical evidence to support sexual intercourse — Victim alleged to have a history of filing
India Law Library Docid # 2440482

(387) KAPIL DEV SHARMA Vs. STATE OF H.P. AND OTHERS[HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 25-02-2026
Administrative Law — Office Orders — Withdrawal of service benefits — An initial office order dated 17.03.2025, which withdrew certain service benefits after the enactment of a new Act, was subsequently declared infructuous and withdrawn by a later office order dated 10.09.2025 — The subsequent order directed the restoration
India Law Library Docid # 2440378

(388) ASHOK KUMAR AND OTHERS Vs. STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AND OTHERS[HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 25-02-2026
Service Law — Regularization of services — Claim for regularization denied due to lack of proof of employer-employee relationship — Appellants failed to produce appointment orders, attendance records, or proof of payment for services rendered — Merely possessing identity cards or handling receipt books does not establish employment — Previous litigation had also dismissed similar claims on the grounds
India Law Library Docid # 2440379

(389) DEEPAK UPADHYAY Vs. STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AND OTHERS[HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 25-02-2026
Transfer of Employees — Challenging transfer order — Appellant argued transfer was without consent — Court held transfer was due to exigency of service for expediting recovery proceedings of Non-Performing Assets — Employee's duty to serve employer — No malafide or arbitrary action alleged — Writ Court would not
India Law Library Docid # 2440380

(390) LALITA DEVI Vs. STATE OF HP AND OTHERS[HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 25-02-2026
Service Law — Termination of services — Anganwadi Worker — Insubordination and indiscipline — Orders to shift Anganwadi Centre were repeatedly disobeyed despite show cause notices and ample opportunities — Husband of worker misbehaved with superior officers, registered FIR — Termination justified as insubordination affects hierarchy and chain of command — Termination not perverse
India Law Library Docid # 2440381

(391) ARPITA KUMARI Vs. ARUN THAKUR[HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 25-02-2026
Family Courts Act, 1984 — Maintenance — Retrospective effect — Maintenance awarded by Family Court should be from date of filing of petition, not from date of order — High Court modified Family Court’s order to grant maintenance from date of filing of petition, allowing respondent to pay arrears in installments.
India Law Library Docid # 2440382

(392) DR. SARISHTI KATWAL Vs. STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AND ANOTHER[HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 25-02-2026
Service Law — Non-Practicing Allowance (NPA) — Doctors recruited after May 24, 2023 — Notification dated May 24, 2023, stating that NPA will not be admissible for doctors recruited henceforth — Petitioner's appointment notification was dated September 29, 2022, but she joined on July 5, 2023, after the new notification — Court held that the notification was prospective and did not affect those appointed
India Law Library Docid # 2440412

(393) SH. SANJAY KUMAR Vs. STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AND OTHERS[HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 25-02-2026
Constitution of India, 1950 — Articles 14 and 16 — Transfer of public servant — Arbitrary exercise of power — Transfer order found to be actuated by extraneous considerations to adjust private respondents, not by administrative exigency or public interest — Such action held to be hit by Articles 14 and 16.
India Law Library Docid # 2440413

(394) SMT. ASHA DEVI Vs. SUDESH KUMARI AND OTHERS[HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 25-02-2026
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 — Section 5 — Validity of second marriage during lifetime of first spouse — Plaintiff sought declaration and injunction, claiming to be co-owner based on alleged marriage to deceased — Plaintiff admitted to previous marriage and divorce — Record showed deceased was already married to Respondent No — 1, who was alive — Second marriage while first spouse is alive is void under
India Law Library Docid # 2440414

(395) GREATER NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Vs. M/S. ELEVATOR PROPERTIES PVT. LTD.[ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT] 25-02-2026
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Order 47 Rule 1 — Review of judgment — Grounds for review — Mistake or error apparent on face of record — Review petition cannot be used to re-argue decided matters or for a rehearing if no substantial and compelling circumstances exist.
India Law Library Docid # 2440785

(396) SHRI DEVI DAYAL Vs. NAGAR MAHAPALIKA KANPUR[ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT] 25-02-2026
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Section 100 — Second Appeal — Substantial question of law — Admission of appeal on substantial questions of law — Court to re-examine if questions are indeed substantial — Whether question of law is substantial depends on facts and circumstances, needing judicious balance between doing justice and avoiding prolongation of litigation — A question of law is
India Law Library Docid # 2440786

(397) RAJENDRA TYAGI AND OTHERS Vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS[ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT] 25-02-2026
U.P. Municipal Corporations Act, 1959 — Sections 172, 173, 174, 116, 5, 2(74) — U.P — Municipal Corporation (Property Taxes) Rules, 2000 (‘the Rules’) — Rules 4, 4-A, 4-B, 4-C — Property Tax Revision — Determination of Minimum Monthly Rental Rate (MMRR) — Public Interest Litigation (PIL) — Petitioners challenging revision of property taxes — Municipal Commissioner's power to determine MMRR
India Law Library Docid # 2440787

(398) AMAR SINGH AND OTHERS Vs. STATE OF U.P.[ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT] 25-02-2026
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 396 — Dacoity with murder — Appeal against conviction — Conviction based on testimony of injured witnesses and informant — Court found their testimony unreliable due to inherent improbabilities and lack of corroboration — Dacoity committed in electric light without covering faces is against human nature and usual conduct of dacoits — No recovery of looted articles from
India Law Library Docid # 2440788

(399) BHARTIBEN Vs. STATE OF GUJARAT[GUJARAT HIGH COURT] 25-02-2026
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 302 — Murder — Conviction based on extrajudicial confession — Court must be satisfied with the voluntariness and truthfulness of the confession — The evidentiary value depends on the person to whom it is made and the circumstances — Corroboration is not strictly required but adds credibility.
India Law Library Docid # 2440949

(400) SONA NEWANDRAM SHARMA Vs. NARENDRA HARESHBHAI SHARMA[GUJARAT HIGH COURT] 25-02-2026
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 — Section 13B — Divorce by mutual consent — Appeal filed challenging Family Court's order allowing divorce by mutual consent — Parties had jointly applied for divorce by mutual consent and agreed to terms including payment of permanent alimony — Husband issued a cheque for permanent alimony which was
India Law Library Docid # 2440950

First
«
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
»
Last