India Law Library

ive

User not Logged..

India Law Library AI
Lex AI Legal Document Intelligence Assistant

Free Practice/Case Management Software

Latest Cases

First
«
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
»
Last

(81) PALLAVI MESHRAM Vs. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH AND OTHERS[CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT] 04-08-2026
Chhattisgarh Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Other Backward Classes (Regulation of Social Status Certification) Act, 2013 — Sections 6 and 7 — Social Status Certificate — Cancellation — Scope of jurisdiction — High Power Certification Scrutiny Committee — Held, the High Power Certification Scrutiny Committee possesses jurisdiction to conduct an enquiry into a social status certificate
India Law Library Docid # 2448976

(82) RAJA NIKOSE AND OTHERS Vs. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH AND OTHERS[CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT] 04-08-2026
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Sections 302, 307 & 149 — Circumstantial Evidence — Proof beyond reasonable doubt — Identification of accused — Absence of Test Identification Parade — The prosecution relied on the testimony of an injured witness who failed to name the accused in cross-examination, and no Test Identification
India Law Library Docid # 2448977

(83) JAI PRAKASH VERMA Vs. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH AND OTHERS[CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT] 04-08-2026
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — Section 528 — Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 482 — Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 498-A/34 — Quashing of FIR and criminal proceedings — Matrimonial dispute — Amicable settlement — Parties resumed cohabitation and were living together peacefully with their minor child — Wife voluntarily expressed intention not to prosecute —
India Law Library Docid # 2448978

(84) BITOPAN KALITA Vs. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANOTHER[GAUHATI HIGH COURT] 04-08-2026
Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 — Section 8 — Penal Code, 1860 — Section 354 — Sexual assault and outraging modesty — Reliability of sole testimony of victim — Test of sterling witness — Appellant was convicted under Section 8 of POCSO Act and Section 354 IPC for forcibly pulling minor victim into his house, kissing her, and subjecting her to sexual harassment — Discrepancies and material
India Law Library Docid # 2448997

(85) NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. Vs. SANJAY KUMAR SAH AND OTHERS[GAUHATI HIGH COURT] 04-08-2026
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — Section 166 — Claim petition — Proof of rash and negligent driving — Proof of negligence under Section 166 is required to be established on the touchstone of preponderance of probabilities — Appellant insurer contended that claimant failed to establish negligence of bus driver and that application under Section 166 was not maintainable — Evidence of co-passenger established that offending bus collided
India Law Library Docid # 2448998

(86) SOFIUR RAHMAN AND OTHERS Vs. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND OTHERS[GAUHATI HIGH COURT] 04-08-2026
Assam Land and Revenue Regulation, 1886 — Section 151 — Revisional Jurisdiction — Condonation of Delay — Non-exercise of Discretion — Revisional power under Section 151 is not fettered by a period of limitation. Dismissal of revisional application on grounds of delay by relying on an earlier order passed against a third party (non-pattadar) who had
India Law Library Docid # 2448999

(87) MCNALLY BHARAT ENGINEERING COMPANY LIMITED Vs. METSO INDIA PVT. LTD[DELHI HIGH COURT] 03-08-2026
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 — Section 31 — Effect of approved resolution plan — Extinguishment of unclaimed claims — Once a resolution plan is approved by the Adjudicating Authority, it binds the corporate debtor and all creditors; claims not submitted to and incorporated in the plan stand extinguished and cannot thereafter be initiated, continued, or revived, on the "clean slate" principle.
India Law Library Docid # 2448487

(88) SANJAY DUBEY Vs. NANDLAL[DELHI HIGH COURT] 03-08-2026
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Section 114 r/w Order 47 Rule 1 — Error apparent on the face of the record — Scope of review — A review does not permit rehearing of the appeal or re-appreciation of evidence, but is confined to correction of errors apparent on the face of the record, non-consideration of binding precedents, and omission to consider material submissions and statutory provisions;
India Law Library Docid # 2448488

(89) SUDHIR KAWATRA Vs. SHAMLI KAWATRA[DELHI HIGH COURT] 03-08-2026
Public Provident Fund Act, 1968 — Section 10 — Bar under Act does not extend to civil recovery suit by beneficiary — The statutory immunity under Section 10 of the PPF Act, protecting acts done in good faith under the Act or Scheme, does not bar a suit by the beneficiary of a matured PPF account seeking recovery of the withdrawn corpus from the guardian who diverted it to his own use,
India Law Library Docid # 2448489

(90) SHRI NARESH BALYAN Vs. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI[DELHI HIGH COURT] 03-08-2026
Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999 (as extended to NCT of Delhi) — Section 2(1)(d) — "More than one chargesheet in preceding ten years" is syndicate-centric, not individual-centric — The requirement of more than one chargesheet in the preceding ten years for invoking MCOCA relates to the continuing unlawful activity of the organised crime syndicate as a whole, not to the individual accused; an accused's role must be assessed from a wider angle as to whether he acted
India Law Library Docid # 2448490

(91) RAJESH GUPTA Vs. STATE OF HARYANA[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 03-08-2026
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — Section 483 (Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Sections 201, 406, 420, 467, 468) — Regular Bail in Commercial Fraud Case — In a prosecution under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, and 201 IPC alleging cheating and forgery on the pretext of procuring an overseas work visa, where the accused-petitioner has undergone incarceration for nearly three months, the
India Law Library Docid # 2448530

(92) SAROJ RANI Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 03-08-2026
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — Section 483 (Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 — Sections 103, 109, 115(2), 117(2), 190, 191(3)) — Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 — Regular Bail in Murder and Assault Case — Where the petitioner was alleged to have initiated an altercation following a minor dispute and called her family members, who subsequently inflicted injuries leading to the death of
India Law Library Docid # 2448531

(93) ARJAN SINGH @ ARJAN Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 03-08-2026
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — Section 483 — Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 — Sections 21-C, 25, 29, 61, 85 — Article 21 of the Constitution of India — Grant of Regular Bail for Commercial Quantity — Where the petitioner was arrested for alleged recovery of a commercial quantity of contraband (502 grams of heroin) and had suffered incarceration for over one year (1 year and 23 days), while the trial was procrastinating with none of the 11
India Law Library Docid # 2448532

(94) SAKEEL KHAN Vs. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 03-08-2026
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — Section 528 — Quashing of Order / Registration of FIR — Scope of Judicial Interference in Inchoate Allegations — Where a petition was filed under Section 528 of the BNSS, 2023, seeking to quash a speaking order issued by the Superintendent of Police consigning the petitioner's complaint to record, the High Court held that judicial intervention is unwarranted if the police inquiry reveals that the allegations are vague, omnibus, and unsubstantiated — Whe
India Law Library Docid # 2448533

(95) PUSHWINDER KUMAR Vs. STATE OF HARYANA[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 03-08-2026
Criminal Law — Pre-Arrest Bail / Anticipatory Bail — Non-Co-operation / Custodial Interrogation — Sections 167, 420, 467, 468, 471, and 120-B of the Penal Code, 1860 — Section 482 of BNSS, 2023—Where the petitioner joined the investigation pursuant to interim protection but custodial interrogation was sought solely for the recovery of certain documents, absolute anticipatory bail was granted, subject to Section 482(2) BNSS conditions. The order shall be restricted to the specific FIR, reserving
India Law Library Docid # 2448538

(96) SATINDERPAL SINGH @ SATINDER SINGH @ SIKANDER AND ANOTHER Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 03-08-2026
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 — Section 37 — Regular Bail and Delayed Trial –– Delayed trial and prolonged incarceration of an undertrial dilute the statutory rigors under Section 37 of the NDPS Act.
India Law Library Docid # 2448539

(97) GOPAL LAL ANJNA Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 03-08-2026
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 — Section 67 — Evidentiary Value of Co-Accused Disclosure — A confession or disclosure statement made by a co-accused under Section 67 of the NDPS Act is inherently a weak piece of evidence and cannot form the sole basis for the conviction of an individual without independent corroborative substantive evidence — Where the
India Law Library Docid # 2448540

(98) AMIT BISHT Vs. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND[UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT] 03-08-2026
Criminal Law — Right of Private Defence — Requisites and Limits — Proportionality — Accused shot and killed an unarmed victim outside his house, claiming apprehension of threat from past unrelated hotel incidents — The right of private defence is governed by strict legal boundaries and cannot justify retaliation —
India Law Library Docid # 2448541

(99) VISHNU RAJAK Vs. BIRJESH KUMAR AND OTHERS[MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT] 03-08-2026
Limitation Act, 1963 — Section 3 — Statutory duty of Court to examine limitation — No objection by opposite party — Scope of Court's obligation — Section 3 casts a mandatory statutory duty upon the Court to examine whether an appeal is presented within the prescribed period of limitation, irrespective of whether the respondent consents or raises an objection.
India Law Library Docid # 2448800

(100) MD. JAVED Vs. NIRMAL SINGH RAJ PRESIDENT S.E.C.L. EMPLOYEES CO- OPERATIVES THRIFT CREDIT SOCIETY LIMITED AND OTHERS[CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT] 03-08-2026
Chhattisgarh Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 — Section 78 — Rejection of third appeal — Rejection based solely on nomenclature — Conversion to revision petition — Petitioner filed an appeal which was dismissed by the Tribunal as an impermissible third appeal — High Court held that the substance and nature of proceedings cannot
India Law Library Docid # 2448979

First
«
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
»
Last