(801) NEERAJ PRASAD AND OTHERS Vs. SMT. GAURI PRASAD AND OTHERS[CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT] 06-04-2026 Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Order 7 Rule 11 — Rejection of Plaint — Court must consider only averments in plaint, not defence — Rejection impermissible if any claimed relief falls within civil court jurisdiction — SARFAESI Act, 2002 — Section 34 — Jurisdiction of DRT is limited; civil court jurisdiction not barred for India Law Library Docid # 2442502
(802) ANUJ KUMAR AND OTHERS Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN[RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT] 06-04-2026 Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Sections 397, 401 — Revisional Jurisdiction — Scope of — Revisional court should not substitute its own view for that of the trial court unless there is perversity or patent illegality in the trial court's order — Revisional court's order was set aside for failing to indicate any perversity or illegality in the discharge order, and for its lack of independent analysis of the material. India Law Library Docid # 2442663
(803) VIVEK SINGH RAJPUT AND OTHERS Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND OTHERS[RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT] 06-04-2026 Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 482 (Corresponding to Section 528 BNSS) — Inherent power of High Court to quash FIR — Scope and limitations — Court can quash FIR if it does not disclose any cognizable offence or amounts to abuse of process of law — Power to be exercised sparingly in rarest of rare cases — Court cannot inquire into reliability or genuineness of allegations at this stage — India Law Library Docid # 2442664
(804) KAUSHLYA SONI Vs. RAVIKANT SONI[RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT] 06-04-2026 Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 — Section 24 — Orders passed by Family Court under Section 24 — Maintainability of appeal — Prior to this judgment, a Full Bench of this Court in Kavita Vyas v — Deepak Dave held that an appeal under Section 19(1) of the Family Courts Act, 1984 lies against an order passed under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 — However, a subsequent Division Bench in Amit Vyas v — Pramila @ Ranjana expressed doubts about the correctness of the Full Bench India Law Library Docid # 2442665
(805) M/S ULTRA TECH CEMENT LTD. AND OTHERS Vs. ENERGY DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF RAJASTHAN AND OTHERS[RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT] 06-04-2026 Promissory Estoppel and Legitimate Expectation — State Policy and Investor Reliance — The Rajasthan Solar Policy, 2019, with its clear assurance of electricity duty exemption for seven years, induced substantial investment by the petitioner — The State's subsequent withdrawal of this exemption through an amendment was held India Law Library Docid # 2442666
(806) JOGENDRA PAL Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN[RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT] 06-04-2026 Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) — Section 223 & 225 — Complaint procedure — Magistrate's discretion — A Magistrate, upon receiving a complaint, must examine the complainant on oath and reduce the substance of the examination in writing — Subsequently, the Magistrate has the discretion to postpone issuing process and either inquire into the case personally or direct a limited India Law Library Docid # 2442667
(807) KARAN LRS OF SMT. BHAMA DEVI Vs. UNION OF INDIA[RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT (JAIPUR BENCH)] 06-04-2026 Res Judicata and Constructive Res Judicata — Applicability — The principle of res judicata prevents parties from re-litigating issues that have been finally decided in previous proceedings between the same parties — Constructive res judicata applies when a matter that could or ought to have been raised in a previous proceeding was not raised, and is therefore deemed to have been decided — This doctrine is crucial India Law Library Docid # 2442682
(808) SURINDER SINGH AND OTHERS Vs. COLLECTOR LAND ACQUISITION AND ANOTHER[HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 06-04-2026 Land Acquisition Act, 1894 — Market Value Determination — The market value of acquired land is determined by the price a willing purchaser would pay a willing seller, considering existing advantages and potential development, excluding benefits arising from the acquisition scheme itself. India Law Library Docid # 2442757
(809) STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH Vs. TARA CHAND[HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 06-04-2026 Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 — Section 50 — Personal search of accused — Non-compliance of Section 50 vitiates recovery — When an accused is searched personally under the NDPS Act, they must be informed of their right to be searched before a Gazetted Officer or a Magistrate — Offering a third option, such as search by a police officer or a member of the raiding party, is contrary to Section 50 and renders the recovery inadmissible in evidence India Law Library Docid # 2442762
(810) AJIT SINGH Vs. STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH[HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 06-04-2026 Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO Act) — Section 6; Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 64 (BNS) — Grant of bail — Gravity of offence vs. peculiar facts — While gravity of offence is a factor, it cannot be the sole deciding ground for denying bail — The court must balance competing factors, considering that the object of bail is to secure attendance at trial, not to punish or prevent — The victim-prosecutrix's statement that the crime was one of "love" not "lust", as per India Law Library Docid # 2442763
(811) SUSHIL KUMAR Vs. BRIJ BALA (DECEASED) THROUGH LRS[HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 06-04-2026 Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Order 1 Rule 10(2) and Order 6 Rule 17 — Impleadment of parties and amendment of plaint — First Appellate Court's power to remand — A co-owner can maintain a suit for possession against a trespasser or a tenant without impleading other co-owners — Therefore, a suit for possession and recovery of damages cannot be held to be bad for non-joinder of necessary parties merely because other co-owners were not impleaded India Law Library Docid # 2442764
(812) MADHYA PRADESH REAL ESTATE REGULATORY AUTHORITY Vs. SIDDHARTHA DOMICILE CREATION PVT. LTD[MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT (INDORE BENCH)] 06-04-2026 Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 — Section 58 — Maintainability of Appeal — An adjudicatory authority like RERA cannot maintain an appeal under Section 58 against an order setting aside its decision when acting purely in its adjudicatory capacity — However, if the authority acts in a distinct India Law Library Docid # 2442930
(813) SANJAY JATAV Vs. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THROUGH THE POLICE STATION BERASIYA AND ANOTHER[MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT] 06-04-2026 Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Sections 227, 228; Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — Sections 250, 251 — Framing of Charges — Court must apply judicial mind and cannot act as a post office — The order framing charges must reflect application of mind to the material on record, even if briefly, and should not be India Law Library Docid # 2442931
(814) NEETU PARMAR Vs. VARSHAGADEKAR AND OTHERS[MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT] 06-04-2026 Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Section 115 — Madhya Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1961 — Section 26(2) — Election Petition Rules, 1962 — Rule 19(2) — Security Deposit for Revision — A rule mandating security deposit for filing a revision before the High Court, made under delegated legislation, can be invalid if it conflicts with the parent Act or rules framed by the High Court under constitutional India Law Library Docid # 2442932
(815) MOHIT GOUD Vs. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS[MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT (INDORE BENCH)] 06-04-2026 Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956 — Sections 5, 6, 7, 10, 11 and 16 — Validity of adoption — Registration of adoption deed not a mandatory pre-condition — Actual physical act of "giving and taking" with requisite intent, capacity of parties, and consent of spouse are key — Registration only creates a rebuttable presumption India Law Library Docid # 2442933
(816) GAJULAPALLI TIRUPATAMMA AND OTHERS Vs. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH[ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT] 06-04-2026 Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 482 and 156(3) — Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Sections 498-A, 506, 509, 34 — Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 — Sections 3, 4 — Quashing of proceedings — Allegations against distant relatives in matrimonial disputes must be specific and not vague or omnibus — Implicating India Law Library Docid # 2443148
(817) PERURI SREERAMA MURTHY Vs. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH[ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT] 06-04-2026 Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 482 — Quashing of criminal proceedings — High Court's inherent power can be exercised to prevent abuse of process of court or to secure ends of justice — The power should be exercised sparingly and cautiously, and only in rarest of rare cases where allegations, even if taken at face value, do not constitute an offence, or where there is no legal evidence or India Law Library Docid # 2443149
(818) SHAIK BARA SHAHID Vs. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH[ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT] 06-04-2026 Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 — Section 8(c), 20(b)(ii)(B), 27(A) and 37 — Criminal Petition for quashing of proceedings — Petitioner alleged to be a financier of narcotic trafficking operation — Court cannot conduct a mini-trial at the stage of quashing; it must be satisfied that prima facie offences are made out and continuation of proceedings would not be an abuse of India Law Library Docid # 2443150
(819) SHAIK RAHAMAN Vs. THE STATE OF AP REP BY SPL PP, SPECIAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR FOR ACB CASES, HIGH COURT OF A.P., HYDERABAD.[ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT] 06-04-2026 Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 — Sections 7, 12, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) — Abetment by aiding — Accused A2 convicted under Section 12 for allegedly assisting Accused A1 in accepting a bribe — Prosecution failed to prove that Accused A1 committed an offence under Section 7, which is a prerequisite for abetment by aiding, as the property ownership had changed and the rent was no longer payable to the India Law Library Docid # 2443151
(820) S.SELVARAJ (DIED) AND OTHERS Vs. LAKHSHIAMMAL (DIED) AND OTHERS[MADRAS HIGH COURT (MADURAI BENCH)] 06-04-2026 Land Assignment and Title — Plaintiff obtained assignment of poramboke land from the government after fulfilling all formalities including payment of market value and bringing it under cultivation — Assignment was confirmed by revenue authorities, and plaintiff continuously paid land revenue — This established plaintiff’s legal title and possession. India Law Library Docid # 2443340