(681) SUMIT Vs. STATE OF U P AND ANOTHER[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 09-02-2026 Anticipatory Bail — Grant is not automatically terminated by filing of chargesheet or taking of cognizance; protection continues until further orders from a competent court, unless specific reasons are recorded for curtailment. India Law Library Docid # 2439286
(682) BHUPAL SINGH BHANDARI Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 09-02-2026 General Clauses Act, 1897 — Section 21(1) — Representation — Making mere representations to an authority cannot justify a belated approach by an individual to seek relief. India Law Library Docid # 2439552
(683) STATE OF ODISHA AND OTHERS Vs. MANAGING COMMITTEE OF NAMATARA GIRLS HIGH SCHOOL[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 09-02-2026 Odisha Education Act, 1969 — Section 24B — Grant-in-aid — Appeal filed by State against Tribunal's order was time-barred and not accompanied by the certified copy of the impugned order — High Court dismissed the appeal on this ground — State sought recall of the order, along with an application for condonation of delay — High Court rejected the condonation of delay application, noting the appeal was India Law Library Docid # 2439387
(684) THE KERALA WATER AUTHORITY AND OTHERS Vs. T I RAJU AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 09-02-2026 Contract Law — Interest on Delayed Payment — Public Project Agreement — Clause stipulating settlement of claims based on budget availability and seniority, and waiving claims for damages or interest for delayed settlement — Contractor included this clause, indicating awareness and acceptance — Clause binds parties and governs India Law Library Docid # 2440292
(685) THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER AND SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER Vs. M/S S.V. GLOBAL MILL LIMITED[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 09-02-2026 Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 — Section 24(1)(a) — Applicability of the 2013 Act when award passed after its commencement, even if proceedings initiated under the 1894 Act — Provisions of the 2013 Act, except for rehabilitation and resettlement entitlements, apply to compensation determination. India Law Library Docid # 2439190
(686) ASIANET SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS LTD Vs. M/S JEEVAN TELECASTING CORPORATION LIMITED[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 09-02-2026 Limitation Act, 1963 — Delay in filing appeal — Appeal filed beyond time by 792 days — Delay condoned given pending review applications before Tribunal, which were also delayed. India Law Library Docid # 2439589
(687) MOSTARI BANU Vs. THE ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 09-02-2026 Public Interest Litigation — Election Process — Manpower for Election Commission — State's undertaking to provide officers for election duties — Court directs State to ensure reporting of officers and grants discretion to Election Commission to utilize their services. India Law Library Docid # 2439590
(688) WAJID ALI @ TINKU Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 09-02-2026 Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 — Bail — Delay in sending sample for FSL — Significant delay in sending seized samples to the Forensic Science Laboratory for analysis, without proper explanation, along with the prolonged period of incarceration of the accused, are grounds for granting bail. India Law Library Docid # 2444575
(689) A (MOTHER OF X) Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 06-02-2026 Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971 — Section 3 — Grounds for termination — Woman’s reproductive autonomy — Whether a woman can be compelled to continue a pregnancy against her will — Held, a woman cannot be compelled to continue a pregnancy, especially if she is a minor, as it infringes upon her bodily and decisional autonomy and can cause significant physical and mental trauma. India Law Library Docid # 2439541
(690) V. PATHMAVATHI AND OTHERS Vs. BHARTHI AXA GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD AND ANOTHER[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 06-02-2026 Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — Section 166 — Claim petition for compensation — Deceased victim earning monthly income of Rs. 10,000/- (driver) — MACT and High Court assessed income at Rs. 6,000/- and Rs. 7,000/- respectively — Held, salary certificate and employer's affidavit constitute cogent documentary evidence, mandating acceptance of Rs. 10,000/- as monthly income. India Law Library Docid # 2439068
(691) JANE KAUSHIK Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 06-02-2026 Transgender Rights — Advisory Committee — Appointment of Members — Supreme Court allows application to include Ms. Aparna Mehrotra as a member of the Advisory Committee formed earlier to represent the Centre for Law and Policy Research and its scholarship in transgender rights. India Law Library Docid # 2439069
(692) AMIT KUMAR AND OTHERS Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 06-02-2026 Court Procedure — Appointment of Technical Consultant — Supreme Court directs appointment of former Chief Statistician of India as Technical Consultant to National Task Force for data analysis. India Law Library Docid # 2439070
(693) THARAMMEL PEETHAMBARAN AND ANOTHER Vs. T. USHAKRISHNAN AND ANOTHER[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 06-02-2026 Evidence Act, 1872 — Section 65 — Secondary evidence — Admissibility — Requirement of laying factual foundation stating original document existed and secondly establishing valid reasons for non-production of original — Mechanical copies, such as photocopies, are considered secondary evidence, but their admissibility depends on fulfilling the conditions of Section 65 — Failure to do so renders such evidence inadmissible India Law Library Docid # 2439065
(694) KANTA AND OTHERS Vs. SOMA DEVI (DEAD) THROUGH LR. AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 06-02-2026 Hindu Succession Act, 1956 — Section 14(1) — Right to maintenance ripened into absolute ownership — A limited interest in property acquired by a Hindu female in lieu of maintenance ripens into absolute ownership. India Law Library Docid # 2439066
(695) STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND OTHERS Vs. JAI HIND PVT. LTD.[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 06-02-2026 West Bengal Estates Acquisition Act, 1953 — Sections 6(1)(j), 57A, 53 — Powers of Revenue Officer — Review — Notification investing Revenue Officer with powers of Civil Court does not confer power of review; such power must be statutorily conferred — Power of review is a judicial function and cannot be exercised by executive authorities without express legislative mandate, to uphold separation of India Law Library Docid # 2439067
(696) ITC LIMITED Vs. AASHNA ROY[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 06-02-2026 Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Deficiency in Service — Compensation — Inadequacy of evidence for claim — Supreme Court set aside compensation awarded by the National Commission, holding that photocopies of documents without proper proof of authenticity and without attempts to cross-examine authors or respondent herself, were insufficient to justify a huge claim. India Law Library Docid # 2439201
(697) VIVA HIGHWAYS LTD Vs. MADHYA PRADESH ROAD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD AND ANOTHER[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 06-02-2026 Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Section 29A(6) — Court's power to substitute an Arbitrator — Misinterpretation of "obligates" by High Court — The expression "obligates" in Section 29A(6) means that a substitute Arbitrator would be appointed if the situation warrants, not that the mandate of an Arbitrator automatically terminates and a substitute must be appointed. India Law Library Docid # 2439588
(698) RATUL BHARALI AND ANOTHER Vs. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANOTHER[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 06-02-2026 Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 2012 — Section 6 — Evidence — Age of victim — Investigating Officer stated that radiological report indicated age above 18 and below 19, but school certificate showed age as 15 years on a particular date, leading to non-annexation of the radiological report to the chargesheet. India Law Library Docid # 2439592
(699) MEHAL SINGH Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 06-02-2026 Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 372 (proviso) and Section 378(4) — Appeal against acquittal — Victim's right to appeal — A victim, as defined under Section 2(wa) of Cr.P.C., has the right to file an appeal against a judgment of acquittal under the proviso to Section 372 of Cr.P.C. — Such a victim does not require to obtain leave to appeal against an acquittal under Section 378(4) of Cr.P.C. — High Court's refusal to grant leave to appeal to a victim against an acquittal without co India Law Library Docid # 2439593
(700) M/s. NAV NIRMAN BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD. Vs. THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH DEPUTY DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT, GOVT OF INDIA[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 06-02-2026 Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002 — Section 8(7) — Confiscation of property when trial cannot be concluded — Special Court cannot decide on Section 8(7) application if an appeal against the Section 8(3) confirmation order is pending before a higher forum like the Appellate Tribunal — Doctrine of merger applies — Proceedings under Section 8(7) are deemed stayed until the confirmation order becomes final. India Law Library Docid # 2439600