(881) SRI LAXMI RALLABANDI AND OTHER Vs. THE STATE OF TELANGANA, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, STAMPS AND REGISTRATION AND FOUR OTHERS[TELANGANA HIGH COURT] 06-01-2026 Urban Land Ceiling Act, 1976 — Sections 10(3), 10(5), 10(6) — Possession — Notice — Mandatory requirement of notice to person in possession before taking over possession — Failure to issue notice to current possessors and reliance on paper panchanama invalidates possession claim by government — Subsequent sale deeds sought to be registered, refused on ULC grounds — Property regularized under Land India Law Library Docid # 2438944
(882) SUBHASH AGGARWAL Vs. MAHENDER PAL CHHABRA AND ANOTHER[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 05-01-2026 Specific Relief Act, 1963 — Section 16(c) — Suit for specific performance — Readiness and willingness — Standard of proof — Appellant (plaintiff) failed to demonstrate the necessary financial capacity (readiness and wherewithal) to pay the balance consideration of Rs. India Law Library Docid # 2437731
(883) DHARMENDRA SHARMA Vs. M. ARUNMOZHI AND ANOTHER[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 05-01-2026 Contempt of Court — Non-compliance with Supreme Court Order — Directions to Development Authority (ADA) — Supreme Court previously directed ADA to pay compensation, refund amount with interest, and return non-judicial stamp worth Rs. 3,99,100 to petitioner — ADA returned expired physical stamp papers instead of refunding the value — Petitioner India Law Library Docid # 2437732
(884) PANGANTI VIJAYA Vs. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 05-01-2026 Workmen’s Compensation Act, 1923 — Claim for Compensation — Employer-Employee Relationship — Death arising out of and in the course of employment — Commissioner for Workmen’s Compensation found that the deceased driver was employed and the accident occurred during and in the course of employment, awarding compensation — High Court set aside the award based on the owner's initial counter-affidavit denying employment — Supreme Court restored the Commissioner’s award, noting that the owner India Law Library Docid # 2437733
(885) M/S BHAGHEERATHA ENGINEERING LTD. Vs. STATE OF KERALA[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 05-01-2026 Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Section 34 and Section 37 — Setting aside of Arbitral Award — Scope of judicial review — Arbitral Tribunal's jurisdiction — Contractual dispute resolution mechanism (Adjudicator to Arbitrator) — Setting aside of award by High Court on the ground that the Arbitral Tribunal was appointed to adjudicate only one dispute and exceeded its jurisdiction by deciding others — The arbitration clause was widely worded, and the conduct of the respondent-State indicate India Law Library Docid # 2437734
(886) NAK ENGINEERING COMPANY PVT. LTD. Vs. TARUN KESHRICHAND SHAH AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 05-01-2026 Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Order 1 Rule 10 — Impleadment of parties — Necessary party vs. Proper party — Definition and test — A necessary party is one without whom no effective order or decree can be made; the suit is liable to be dismissed if a necessary party is not impleaded — A proper party is one whose presence enables the court to completely and adequately India Law Library Docid # 2437735
(887) BHADRA INTERNATIONAL (INDIA) PVT. LTD. AND OTHERS Vs. AIRPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 05-01-2026 Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Section 12(5) read with Seventh Schedule — Ineligibility of Arbitrator — Unilateral Appointment — Effect of 2015 Amendment Act — Section 12(5) renders any person whose relationship falls under the Seventh Schedule ineligible to be appointed as an arbitrator, notwithstanding any prior agreement — Where the arbitration clause empowers the Chairman of one party (Airports Authority of India) to unilaterally appoint the India Law Library Docid # 2437736
(888) MOTILAL OSWAL FINANCIAL SERVICES LIMITED Vs. SANTOSH CORDEIRO AND ANOTHER[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 05-01-2026 Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Section 11(6-A) — Appointment of Arbitrator — Scope of judicial review — The court, while considering an application under Section 11, must confine its examination to the prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement, as mandated by the un-notified but effective Section 11(6-A) — The court's role is merely to inspect or scrutinize India Law Library Docid # 2437737
(889) NIRBHAY SINGH SULIYA Vs. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND ANOTHER[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 05-01-2026 Service Law — Disciplinary Proceedings — Judicial Officer — Removal from Service — Misconduct — Judicial orders and grant of bail — A judicial officer, with 27 years of unblemished service, was removed based solely on four bail orders where Section 59-A of the Madhya Pradesh Excise Act, 1915 (imposing twin conditions for bail) was not expressly mentioned, contrasted with 14 other India Law Library Docid # 2437738
(890) ANJANI SINGH Vs. THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 05-01-2026 Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Sections 302, 307, 504 read with 34 — Appreciation of Evidence — Sole Eye Witness Testimony (PW-1) — Reliability — Where a sole eye witness's testimony is wavering, inconsistent regarding the scene of the crime and the specific role of the accused, and where motive is alleged only against the PW but multiple innocent persons were killed at close range (suggesting targeted killing) without motive, the testimony India Law Library Docid # 2437739
(891) GULFISHA FATIMA Vs. STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI)[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 05-01-2026 Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 (UAPA) — Section 43D(5) — Bail — Accused Sharjeel Imam — Role attributed is that of a "principal ideologue and early architect" of the alleged conspiracy, involving the creation of coordination platforms (WhatsApp groups), mobilization through pamphlets, and delivery of speeches advocating disruptive "Chakka Jam" (road blockage/paralysis of essential services) as India Law Library Docid # 2437740
(892) ADANI POWER LTD. AND ANOTHER Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 05-01-2026 Special Economic Zones Act, 2005 (SEZ Act) — Section 30 — Customs Act, 1962 — Section 12 — Levy of Customs Duty on Electrical Energy — Clearance from Special Economic Zone (SEZ) to Domestic Tariff Area (DTA) — Absence of Charging Event — Electrical energy generated in India within an SEZ and supplied to DTA is not ‘imported into India’ under Section 12 of the Customs Act — The deeming fiction in Section 30 of the SEZ India Law Library Docid # 2437741
(893) SUKHCHAIN Vs. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 05-01-2026 Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 389 — Suspension of Sentence — Fixed Term Sentence — Appellate Court's Approach — The High Court while considering an application for suspension of a fixed term substantive sentence passed by the Trial Court pending appeal must apply settled principles of law and consider the plea liberally, unless exceptional circumstances exist, in contrast to the approach India Law Library Docid # 2437833
(894) RAVINDER SINGH GANDOAK Vs. STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) AND OTHERS[DELHI HIGH COURT] 05-01-2026 Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 311A — Power of Magistrate to order specimen signatures or handwriting — Challenge to Magistrate's order directing Petitioner to give handwriting samples — Petitioner placed in Column 12 of Chargesheet (insufficient evidence) and claims never to have been arrested — Proviso to Section 311A mandates arrest as a condition for the order — Interpretation of Proviso: The proviso’s requirement that “the person has at some time been arrested” applies to an India Law Library Docid # 2437889
(895) MANOJ MISHRA AND OTHERS Vs. STATE (GNCTD) AND OTHERS[DELHI HIGH COURT] 05-01-2026 Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 482 — Inherent power of High Court — Quashing of FIR and consequential proceedings — The High Court can exercise its inherent power to quash criminal proceedings, including the FIR and ensuing charge-sheet/charge orders, when the allegations, even if taken on face value, do not disclose the commission of cognizable offences or where the proceedings amount to an India Law Library Docid # 2437890
(896) CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION Vs. KULWANT RAI[DELHI HIGH COURT] 05-01-2026 Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 378(2)(b) — Appeal against acquittal — Powers of Appellate Court — Role of Appellate Court is to ensure justice; acquittal supported by overwhelming evidence of guilt should be set aside — Trial Court erred in disbelieving the complete prosecution case based on trivial discrepancies despite substantial evidence proving recovery and counterfeit nature of notes, and voluntary extra-judicial confession (statement under Section 108 Customs Act) India Law Library Docid # 2437891
(897) M/S. SUPREME INFRASTRUCTURE INDIA LTD. Vs. ENGINEER-IN-CHIEF, ARMY HEADQUARTER[DELHI HIGH COURT] 05-01-2026 Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Section 34 — Scope of Interference — Judicial Review of Arbitral Awards — The scope of interference under Section 34 is limited and not appellate; it does not permit re-appreciation of evidence or substitution of the court's view for that of the Arbitral Tribunal — Interference is warranted only on grounds expressly provided, such as patent illegality, perversity, or contravention of the India Law Library Docid # 2437892
(898) MOHD BURHAN AND OTHERS Vs. SHRI TRILOKI NATH (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH LRS AND OTHERS[DELHI HIGH COURT] 05-01-2026 Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 — Section 14(1)(e) — Bona fide requirement — Assessment date — The bona fide need of the landlord must be examined as on the date of the institution of the eviction proceedings — Once an eviction order is passed, the subsequent death of the landlord during the pendency of a review or appeal proceedings does not extinguish the right to obtain possession as the legal heirs are fully entitled to India Law Library Docid # 2437893
(899) KAMALKISHORE BAGHEL Vs. UDAY SINGH AND OTHERS[MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT (GWALIOR BENCH)] 05-01-2026 Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — Section 173 — Claim for Compensation — Enhancement of Compensation — Assessment of Compensation — The Claims Tribunal's assessment of the claimant's income at Rs. 2,000/- per month and the overall compensation awarded were deemed fair and just, warranting no interference by the High Court — Claimants' appeal for enhancement dismissed. India Law Library Docid # 2437899
(900) NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. Vs. HARISH CHANDRA SENGAR AND OTHERS[MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT (GWALIOR BENCH)] 05-01-2026 Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — Section 163-A — Maintainability of Claim Petition — Structured Formula — Section 163-A provides for a distinct scheme for immediate relief to a section of people whose annual income does not exceed Rs. 40,000/-; claims of those earning above this limit must be determined under Chapter XII of the Act — If the claimant's asserted or proven annual income exceeds Rs. 40,000/-, the India Law Library Docid # 2437900