ive
User not Logged..
India's Biggest Headnotes Library over 53.69 Lakhs Headnotes
     Free Artificial Intelligence Case Analyzer  

   AI Submission Generator [on behalf of Appellant/Respondent]  

Latest Cases

(821) KUM. SHUBHA @ SHUBHASHANKAR Vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ANOTHER[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 14-07-2025
Penal Code, 1860 — Sections 302, 201 and 120B — Murder and Criminal Conspiracy — Destruction of Evidence — Circumstantial Evidence — Conviction upheld based on motive, call detail records (CDR), and recovery of weapons, despite unreliable eyewitnesses.
India Law Library Docid # 2427848

(822) SHAILESH KUMAR SINGH ALIAS SHAILESH R. SINGH Vs. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 14-07-2025
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 — Sections 60(b), 316(2), 318(2) — Cheating and Criminal Breach of Trust — FIR quashed as no offence made out. Civil dispute cannot be used to initiate criminal proceedings. High Court’s direction for mediation with payment of money is inappropriate
India Law Library Docid # 2427895

(823) RAJEEV KUMAR SHARMA Vs. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND AND ANOTHER[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 14-07-2025
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 — Section 156(3) — Police Investigation — Magistrate’s powers — A private complaint filed before a Magistrate can be processed by taking cognizance, directing police investigation under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C., or initiating a magisterial inquiry under Section 202 Cr.P.C — Dismissal of complaint under Section 203 Cr.P.C is also an option.
India Law Library Docid # 2427943

(824) KATHYAYINI Vs. SIDHARTH P.S. REDDY AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 14-07-2025
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 — Section 482 — Penal Code, 1860 — Sections 120B, 415, 420, 34 — Quashing of criminal proceedings — Pendency of civil suit — While the High Court found a prima facie case of criminal conspiracy and cheating against the respondents, it quashed the criminal proceedings due to the pendency of a civil suit concerning the same subject matter — The Supreme Court overturned this,
India Law Library Docid # 2427825

(825) ESTATE OFFICER, HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND OTHERS Vs. NIRMALA DEVI[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 14-07-2025
Land Acquisition — Allotment of Plots to Oustees — Policy of 1992 vs. Policy of 2016 — Application Procedure — Earnest Money — Delay and Laches — Maintainability of Suits — While previous policy (1992) required oustees to apply in a specified format with 10% earnest money, many failed to do so, instituting suits 14-20 years later — The High Court affirmed benefits based on the 1992 policy without addressing the non-compliance with application formalities or the significant delay;
India Law Library Docid # 2427862

(826) MOHAMMAD ALI Vs. SHARANAPPA[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 14-07-2025
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 — Section 138 — Dishonour of cheque — Appeal against High Court's conviction — Appellant argued that foundational facts for proving the offence were not laid by the complainant and therefore the presumption under Sections 118 and 139 of the Act should not have been raised — Court found that the complainant had proved his case and the High Court was
India Law Library Docid # 2428312

(827) SHANTI LAL AND OTHERS Vs. SHRI JAGANNATH AND OTHERS[RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT] 14-07-2025
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 — Order 26 Rule 9 — Commissions to make local investigations — Appointment of Local Commissioner — Trial Court rejected application for appointment of a Local Commissioner to ascertain possession and status of suit land — High Court held that appointment was necessary to fairly ascertain disputed physical possession and condition of the suit land, which would
India Law Library Docid # 2428870

(828) UDHYOG MANDIR JAIPUR Vs. SHRI BHARAT K. SHAH AND OTHERS[RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT] 14-07-2025
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 — Order 6 Rule 17 — Amendment of Pleadings — Application seeking amendment dismissed by trial court on ground that issue related to damaged premises already framed, allowing parties to lead evidence — High Court held that while procedurally the trial court's stance was sound, it failed to consider the need for accurate pleadings reflecting current material facts, and denial of amendment
India Law Library Docid # 2428871

(829) NATIONAL TEXTILES CORPORATION LTD. AND OTHERS Vs. AJMER SAHKARI UPBHOKTA WHOLESALE BHANDAR LIMITED[RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT (JAIPUR BENCH)] 11-07-2025
Appeal dismissed as both the trial court and first appellate court correctly concluded that the plaintiff's need for the disputed property would be satisfied by partial eviction and that the defendants did not materially alter the premises — No substantial question of law arose for admission.
India Law Library Docid # 2428607

(830) PAPPULAL Vs. M/S. S.N. REALMART AND OTHERS[RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT (JAIPUR BENCH)] 11-07-2025
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Order 7 Rule 11 — Rejection of plaint — Application for rejection of plaint based on disputed facts and legal contentions — Court's power under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC is limited to examining averments in the plaint — If the objections raised require delving into evidence, the application must be dismissed — Trial court correctly dismissed the application as it did not err in its
India Law Library Docid # 2428608

(831) MADAN MOHAN SHARMA AND OTHERS Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND OTHERS[RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT] 11-07-2025
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Sections 306, 107 — Abetment of suicide — Essential ingredients — Active instigation or intentional aid required — Mere financial disputes, harassment or mental distress not sufficient unless directly linked to inciting or facilitating suicide — Suicide note stating act done "of my own volition" negates coercion — Conviction requires positive act proximately leading to suicide.
India Law Library Docid # 2428746

(832) FIRM JEHTMAL & SONS Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN[RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT] 11-07-2025
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Sections 385, 386 — Appeal against conviction — Dismissal for non-prosecution — An appeal against conviction cannot be dismissed for non-prosecution; it must be heard and decided on merits even if the appellant or their counsel is absent. Courts are not obligated to adjourn cases but can decide on merits. If justice is denied, higher courts can provide remedy
India Law Library Docid # 2428747

(833) BRIJENDRA SINGH Vs. BHANWAR SINGH AND OTHERS[RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT] 11-07-2025
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 — Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 — Temporary Injunction — Prima facie case, balance of convenience, irreparable injury — Dismissal of application for temporary injunction by trial court upheld by High Court — Appellant failed to establish all three essential conditions required for grant of temporary injunction.
India Law Library Docid # 2428748

(834) SMT. SUSHILA Vs. RADHESHYAM[RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT] 11-07-2025
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 125 — Maintenance — Dismissal of application — Erroneous appreciation of evidence — Family Court erred in dismissing the maintenance application by selectively relying on isolated statements from cross-examination and making perverse observations about the applicant’s living
India Law Library Docid # 2428749

(835) MOTIYA ALIAS AMMICHAND Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN[RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT] 11-07-2025
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023 — Section 189(2) (corresponding to Cr.P.C., Section 169) — Release of accused when evidence deficient — Application by Investigating Officer (IO) for release of petitioner based on re-investigation finding petitioner innocent — Trial court dismissing application on technical ground of lack of prior court permission for re-investigation — High Court quashing dismissal order, emphasizing liberty of individual and duty of judiciary to protect it — Re-investigatio
India Law Library Docid # 2428750

(836) SMT. SUJATA Vs. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA[BOMBAY HIGH COURT (NAGPUR BENCH)] 11-07-2025
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 46(4) — Arrest of Woman — After Sunset and Before Sunrise — Mandate for Lady Police Officer and Prior Permission from Judicial Magistrate — When a woman is accused of an offense, her arrest between sunset and sunrise is prohibited unless exceptional circumstances exist — In such exceptional cases, a lady police officer must make a written report and
India Law Library Docid # 2427795

(837) SK. FAKRODDIN Vs. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA[BOMBAY HIGH COURT (AURANGABAD BENCH)] 11-07-2025
Criminal Law — Rape — Penal Code, 1860 — Section 376(2)(f) — Conviction Challenge — Evidentiary Value — Sufficiency of Evidence — In a case challenging conviction under Section 376(2)(f) IPC, the court must meticulously evaluate the prosecution evidence, including the victim’s testimony, parental testimony, and medical evidence for corroboration.
India Law Library Docid # 2427796

(838) RUPA JITENDRA DESHPRABHU Vs. DR. VASUDEV RAJENDRA DESHPRABHU[BOMBAY HIGH COURT (GOA BENCH)] 11-07-2025
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 — Section 47 — Execution of Decree — Objections by Third Party — Maintainability of Repeated Objections — A second application by a third party raising objections identical to a previously dismissed application under Section 47, where the previous dismissal was on merits and upheld by higher courts, is not maintainable — The principle of res judicata or issue estoppel prevents re
India Law Library Docid # 2427797

(839) MS. NEERA MISRA Vs. RAKESH CHANDRA MISRA[DELHI HIGH COURT] 11-07-2025
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 — Order 6, Rule 17 — Amendment of Pleadings — Precedence over Order VII, Rule 11 Application — An application for amendment of plaint under Order VI, Rule 17 CPC must be decided before an application for rejection of plaint under Order VII, Rule 11 CPC, even if the latter was filed earlier in time.
India Law Library Docid # 2427798

(840) VINOD RAI @ BHULLAN Vs. STATE (NCT OF DELHI)[DELHI HIGH COURT] 11-07-2025
Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO Act) — Sections 2(d), 5(m), 6, 12, 29, 30, 42 — Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Sections 354A, 376(2)(n)(i), 450, 506 — Sexual Offences — Conviction and Sentence — Appeal against conviction for sexual assault, house trespass, criminal intimidation and sexual harassment — Age of victim crucial for POCSO Act application.
India Law Library Docid # 2427799