India Law Library

ive

User not Logged..

Law Books shopping cart Launched! - Big Offers & Huge Discounts - All Law Books at One Place — Limited Time Deals!!

Free Artificial Intelligence Drafting

Free Artificial Intelligence Case Analyzer

Latest Cases

1
2
3
4
5
»
Last

(1) PARAMESHWARI Vs. THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 17-02-2026
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Sections 307, 326, 324 — Conviction for causing life-threatening injuries — High Court reducing sentence to period already undergone and enhancing fine — Supreme Court held High Court acted in defiance of law and created a travesty of established criminal jurisprudence by relying on irrelevant factors like time elapsed and death of victim by other persons, without proper
India Law Library Docid # 2439554

(2) DINESH KUMAR Vs. THE STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 17-02-2026
Societies Registration Act, 1860 — Societies formed for charitable purposes — Members of government service entitled to housing facilities through transparent allotment — The society, HEWO, formed for welfare of HUDA employees, not subject to Article 12 of the Constitution, but must adhere to principles of fairness and
India Law Library Docid # 2439555

(3) RAKESH MITTAL Vs. AJAY PAL GUPTA @ SONU CHAUDHARY AND ANOTHER[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 17-02-2026
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Sections 406, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 506 — Cheating, Criminal Breach of Trust, Forgery — Bail — High Court order granting bail to accused set aside — Accused is a habitual offender with multiple aliases, fake IDs, and a history of absconding and non-cooperation with trial — Bail was granted
India Law Library Docid # 2439556

(4) ROHIT JANGDE Vs. THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 17-02-2026
Evidence Act, 1872 — Section 27 — Admissibility of statements made by accused in custody — Statement made by accused not in police custody at time of making it is not admissible under Section 27, but can be admitted as conduct under Section 8 as a link in the chain of evidence.
India Law Library Docid # 2439557

(5) GUDIPALLI SIDDHARTHA REDDY Vs. STATE C.B.I.[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 17-02-2026
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Sections 306 and 309 — Abetment of suicide and attempt to commit suicide — Suicide pact — Mutual encouragement and reciprocal commitment to die together — Survivor's participation acts as a direct catalyst for the deceased's actions — Psychological assurance or instigation, if intentional and directly related to the commission of offence, constitutes abetment — Each
India Law Library Docid # 2439558

(6) GURUVACHAN SINGH Vs. UNION OF INDIA[DELHI HIGH COURT] 16-02-2026
Railways Act, 1989 — Section 123(c) — "Untoward Incident" — Bona Fide Passenger — Burden of proof — Claimant's initial burden to prove by affidavit of relevant facts, shifting burden to Railways — Mere absence of ticket does not negate claim of bona fide passenger.
India Law Library Docid # 2439505

(7) RAMSAROJ Vs. STATE OF KERALA AND OTHERS[KERALA HIGH COURT] 16-02-2026
Kerala Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 2007 — Section 15(1)(a) and Section 2(p)(iii) — Known rowdy — Externment proceedings initiated against petitioner classified as a "known rowdy" based on recurrent involvement in criminal activities, including recent offenses under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.
India Law Library Docid # 2439507

(8) JAMES MATHEW AND OTHER Vs. STATE OF KERALA[KERALA HIGH COURT] 16-02-2026
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 120B r/w 420 — Criminal conspiracy and cheating — Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 — Section 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) — Abuse of official position — For conviction under Section 420 IPC, intention to cheat must exist at the inception of the transaction — Evidence showing the nature of loan was changed to an ordinary loan with higher interest rate due to inability to construct
India Law Library Docid # 2439508

(9) SOUTH INDIAN BANK LTD Vs. MUHAAMMADKANI RAWTHER AND OTHERS[KERALA HIGH COURT] 16-02-2026
Kerala High Court Act, 1958 — Section 5(i) — Maintainability of Writ Appeal — Against interim order — Test is whether the order substantially affects rights and liabilities or causes prejudice, not merely procedural.
India Law Library Docid # 2439509

(10) TOGY GEORGE Vs. STATE OF KERALA[KERALA HIGH COURT] 16-02-2026
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — Section 528 — Inherent jurisdiction of High Court — Quashing of proceedings — Settled disputes — High Court can exercise inherent powers to quash criminal proceedings when the dispute between parties has been amicably settled, particularly in cases involving non-grave offences
India Law Library Docid # 2439510

(11) SREEKALA Vs. AJITH KUMAR[KERALA HIGH COURT] 16-02-2026
Family Court Act, 1984 / Domestic Violence Act, 2005 — Conflicting Orders — Exceeding Jurisdiction — Family Court order injuncting appellant from residence, despite prior protection order from Judicial Magistrate, held improper and set aside — Family Court cannot virtually sit in appeal over a Magistrate’s order.
India Law Library Docid # 2439511

(12) M/S MILLENIUM REALTECH PVT. LTD. Vs. M/S OPAQUE INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD.[DELHI HIGH COURT] 16-02-2026
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Section 37 — Appeal against order under Section 34 — Scope of interference — Appellate jurisdiction under Section 37 is narrow and limited to examining legality of findings by the court under Section 34, and cannot reassess merits of arbitral award.
India Law Library Docid # 2439502

(13) MOIDEEN KUTTY K @ M. K. FAIZY Vs. DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT[DELHI HIGH COURT] 16-02-2026
Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 — Section 439 CrPC — Bail Application — Applicant arrested on 03.03.2025, in custody since then — Applicant’s name not in initial FIR or ECIR, only surfaced in 7th Supplementary Prosecution Complaint — No prima facie allegations against applicant in predicate offence proceedings by NIA — Delated inclusion in ED’s complaint, not in NIA
India Law Library Docid # 2439503

(14) M/S DELHI COLD STORAGE PRIVATE LIMITED AND OTHER Vs. STATE (NCT OF DELHI)[DELHI HIGH COURT] 16-02-2026
Companies Act, 1956 — Section 108 & 629A — Transfer of shares — Issue estoppel — Complaint filed by Registrar of Companies based on allegations already adjudicated in a previous private complaint filed by a shareholder was held to be barred by the principle of issue estoppel.
India Law Library Docid # 2439504

(15) VINAY KUMAR GUPTA Vs. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 16-02-2026
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 438 — Anticipatory Bail — Dismissal of High Court application — Supreme Court intervention — Appellant aggrieved by denial of anticipatory bail by High Court — Supreme Court granted leave, set aside High Court order, and directed bail upon arrest, subject to appellant cooperating with investigation within legal limits.
India Law Library Docid # 2439533

(16) MANOJ Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 13-02-2026
Essential Commodities Act, 1955 — Sections 3, 7 — Cement Control Order, 1967 — Maharashtra Cement (Licensing and Control) Order, 1973 — Decontrol of cement price and distribution from March 1, 1989 — Conviction for offences relating to cement contravention after decontrol — Unsustainable in law — Prosecution fundamentally unsustainable due to absence of operative control order on relevant date.
India Law Library Docid # 2439380

(17) BALMUKUND SINGH GAUTAM Vs. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND ANOTHER[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 13-02-2026
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 438 — Anticipatory Bail — Absconding accused — General rule is that an absconder is not entitled to anticipatory bail, exception being when court is prima facie satisfied that no case is made out against the accused after perusing FIR, case diary, and other materials — Accused absconded for almost six and a half years, threatened victim, had criminal
India Law Library Docid # 2439381

(18) PAWAN KUMAR AND OTHERS Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 13-02-2026
Service Law — Regularisation of Services — Casual Workers — Supreme Court held that casual workers who were similarly situated to those whose services had been regularised in previous judgments, should also have their services regularised. The Court noted that the work performed was perennial and fundamental to the functioning of the department, and that excluding these workers amounted to discrimination.
India Law Library Docid # 2439382

(19) THE TIRUCHIRAPPALLI DISTRICT CRICKET ASSOCIATION Vs. ANNA NAGAR CRICKET CLUB AND ANOTHER ETC.[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 13-02-2026
Cricket Association Rules — Applicability of Supreme Court Judgments — A district cricket association's rules and bye-laws are not necessarily required to be identical to those of the national cricket governing body (BCCI) based on previous Supreme Court judgments, as the specific rulings in those cases did not mandate such precise conformity for district associations.
India Law Library Docid # 2439383

(20) STATE BANK OF INDIA Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 13-02-2026
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 — Section 14, Section 238 — Telecom laws — Spectrum — Nature of — Can spectrum, even if treated as an asset in corporate debtor's books, be subjected to proceedings under IBC? — Held, No. Spectrum is a natural resource, the right to use which is granted by the Government under a licence, not ownership. The IBC cannot override the specific statutory regime governing telecommunications law.
India Law Library Docid # 2439384

1
2
3
4
5
»
Last