(1) KHALIL PASHA AND OTHERS Vs. ABDUL RASHEED AND ANOTHER[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 28-07-2026 Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 — Sections 401(4), 372 proviso, 378 — Revision at instance of victim against acquittal — Maintainability — After insertion of proviso to S. 372 by Act 5 of 2009 conferring victim a statutory right of appeal against acquittal without need for special leave, no revision is maintainable at victim's instance where such appellate remedy is available — Section 401(4) bars revision India Law Library Docid # 2448195
(2) MUMBAI PORT AUTHORITY Vs. NATIONAL COMMISSION FOR SCHEDULED CASTE AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 28-07-2026 Constitution of India, 1950 — Article 338(5)(b), (8) — National Commission for Scheduled Castes — Nature of powers — NCSC's power to inquire into deprivation of "rights and safeguards" of Scheduled Castes is recommendatory/advisory and not adjudicatory — Civil court powers under clause (8) (summoning witnesses, India Law Library Docid # 2448196
(3) STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS Vs. ZAFAR ALI AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 28-07-2026 U.P. Excise (Settlement of Licences for Retail Sale of Country Liquor) Rules, 2002 — Rules 14, 15 — Minimum Guaranteed Quota (MGQ) — Annual vs monthly compliance — Where a licensee has lifted the entire annual MGQ, penalty cannot be levied for isolated monthly shortfall by ignoring the "credit balance" of licence fee earned through excess lifting in prior months — Definition of "licence fee" under R.2(m), being equal to duty on annual MGQ, does not support demand based solely India Law Library Docid # 2448197
(4) AKEEL AZHAR @ RINKU Vs. STATE (NCT OF DELHI)[DELHI HIGH COURT] 28-07-2026 Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Sections 376(2), 323, 506(1); POCSO Act, 2012 — Section 6 — Sole testimony of child victim — Corroboration — Conviction for aggravated penetrative sexual assault upheld on the consistent, cogent testimony of the child victims, corroborated by medical evidence — Non-support by the youngest child witness does not dilute the credibility of the other victims — Sole testimony of prosecutrix, if trustworthy, suffices for conviction; India Law Library Docid # 2448210
(5) TEJAS J.SHAH & AMISHA T. SHAH AND OTHERS Vs. MANTRI TECHNOLOGY CONSTELLATIONS PVT.LTD. (NOW KNOWN AS BUOYANT TECHNOLOGY CONSTELLATIONS PVT.LTD.) AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 27-07-2026 Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 — Section 14 — Moratorium — Scope and ambit — Held, moratorium under S.14 operates against the corporate debtor alone and cannot be judicially enlarged to cover other categories such as subsidiary companies, directors/managers, promoters or co-respondents, unless specifically provided by statute — Adjudicating authority or Court cannot expand the India Law Library Docid # 2448130
(6) KRISHNAN NARAYANA Vs. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND OTHERS ETC.[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 27-07-2026 Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 — Sections 451 & 457 — Interim custody of seized property — Nature of Court's power — Held, Court's power under Ss.451/457 CrPC is discretionary, to be exercised judicially and expeditiously, with limited object of preventing waste, misuse or deterioration of seized property pending trial — Exercise involves only prima facie assessment of who is best entitled to India Law Library Docid # 2448131
(7) SANJIV KUMAR Vs. SHAKUNTLA DEVI AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 27-07-2026 Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Section 11 — Res judicata — Applicability to interlocutory applications and erroneous decisions — Held, doctrine of res judicata applies to subsequent stages of same proceedings where issue has been decided at an earlier stage, and a judicial decision binds whether right or wrong — An error of law or fact by a judicial/quasi-judicial body cannot be India Law Library Docid # 2448132
(8) THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH Vs. SUDA SURESH VEERA VENKATA NAGA RAJU[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 27-07-2026 Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — Section 187(2) & (3) — Police custody — Statutory window enlarged — Held, unlike erstwhile S.167 CrPC, S.187(2) & (3) BNSS enlarges the window during which police custody (aggregating up to fifteen days) may be sought in parts during first 40/60 days of permissible detention, rather than confined to first fifteen days of remand — Intended to meet situations where fresh facts/discoveries/leads emerge during investigation — Rigid or India Law Library Docid # 2448133
(9) SUBHODH CHOUDHARY @ BHOORA @ CHHOTU Vs. STATE[DELHI HIGH COURT] 27-07-2026 Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 376 — Rape — Consent — Sterling quality of testimony — Conviction cannot rest on the testimony of a prosecutrix that lacks sterling quality — riddled with material contradictions on the sequence and manner of the incident, corroborated instead by defence witnesses indicating a consensual relationship — where forensic evidence is India Law Library Docid # 2448218
(10) JAI PRAKASH AND OTHERS Vs. D.D.A.[DELHI HIGH COURT] 27-07-2026 Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 — Burden of proof — Employer-employee relationship — The initial burden of proving the existence of a lawful employer-employee relationship rests on the workman asserting it; it does not shift to the management merely because employment is disputed — Proof that a person physically worked and drew remuneration is distinct from proof India Law Library Docid # 2448219
(11) NITIN KUMAR Vs. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANOTHER[DELHI HIGH COURT] 27-07-2026 Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Sections 306, 107 — Framing of charge — Abetment of suicide — Prima facie standard — At the stage of framing of charge, the court is required only to evaluate whether the material discloses grave suspicion against the accused, not to conduct a mini-trial or apply the standard of proof beyond reasonable doubt — Discharge of co-accused, India Law Library Docid # 2448220
(12) ARCHANA Vs. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS[MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT] 27-07-2026 Cybercrime and Bank Account Freezing — This case addresses the freezing of bank accounts due to cybercrime complaints — The court emphasizes that freezing an entire account for a small disputed amount is disproportionate and violates principles of fairness and proportionality — A Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for grievance redressal in such cases is highlighted, aiming to balance investigation needs with the account holder's India Law Library Docid # 2448254
(13) POONGOTHAI Vs. SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT AND OTHERS[MADRAS HIGH COURT] 27-07-2026 Tamil Nadu Preventive Detention Act, 1982 — Section 2(ggg) — Delay in passing detention order — Live and proximate link — Unexplained delay of about a month between arrest of the detenu and passing of the detention order snaps the live and proximate link between the grounds and purpose of detention, rendering the detention order invalid, absent any credible material substantiating the detaining authority's subjective satisfaction. [Paras 3, 6–8] India Law Library Docid # 2448211
(14) RAJENDRA SINGH BENIWAL AND OTHERS Vs. THE REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES AND OTHERS[DELHI HIGH COURT] 27-07-2026 Constitution of India, 1950 — Article 226 — Co-operative society elections — Debarment of outgoing office bearers — Debarment of outgoing managing committee members from contesting society elections, passed without service of the order and premised on non-handing over of records that were inaccessible on account of sealing by the municipal authority, set aside; petitioners permitted to file nominations under the revised election schedule, to be scrutinised in accordance with law. [Paras 4–5, 9, India Law Library Docid # 2448212
(15) VIKRAM SINGH CHAUHAN Vs. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND AND ANOTHER[UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT] 27-07-2026 Constitution of India, 1950 — Article 226 — Contractor registration — Arbitrary eligibility condition — A condition restricting contractor registration to those registered in a specified prior year, previously held arbitrary and discriminatory by the Court, held equally invalid when reintroduced in a subsequent advertisement — Impugned advertisement quashed upon the municipal body adopting fresh, non-discriminatory guidelines ensuring fairness and equal opportunity to all contractors. [Paras 5, India Law Library Docid # 2448213
(16) BABLU DEHURY @ ULA Vs. STATE OF ODISHA[ORISSA HIGH COURT] 27-07-2026 Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 — Section 12 proviso — Bail to child in conflict with law — Rule and exception — Bail to a child in conflict with law is the rule, and detention the exception — Denial of bail on the ground of "danger to personal life and safety" or possible association with undesirable elements is unsustainable where the specific circumstances constituting such apprehension are neither disclosed nor discussed in the order — Gravity of offence alone ca India Law Library Docid # 2448214
(17) SANTOSH @ GANIA @ GANESWAR BEHERA Vs. STATE OF ODISHA[ORISSA HIGH COURT] 27-07-2026 Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 — Section 37 — Bail — Commercial quantity — Twin conditions — Where the accused is implicated for transporting contraband exceeding commercial quantity, and prima facie material connects him to the offence, disputed identity alone (raised at the bail stage) does not satisfy the twin conditions India Law Library Docid # 2448215
(18) BISHAL SINGH Vs. STATE OF ORISSA[ORISSA HIGH COURT] 27-07-2026 Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — Section 47 — Constitution of India, 1950 — Article 22(1) — Grounds of arrest — Oral communication and delayed plea — Where the arrest memo discloses the grounds of arrest, orally explained and signed by the accused, and the plea of non-compliance is raised for the first time after a gap of two years without any prejudice being shown, such belated plea does not vitiate the arrest — The requirement of written communication of arrest grounds, per Mihir Raj India Law Library Docid # 2448216
(19) IBRAHIMBHAI RAHIMBHAI CHAUDHARY Vs. STATE OF GUJARAT AND ANOTHER[GUJARAT HIGH COURT] 27-07-2026 Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 482 — Quashing of FIR — Amicable settlement — Inherent power under S — 482 CrPC exercised to quash FIR and consequential proceedings for offences including under S — 376 IPC upon amicable settlement between the parties, where the complainant unequivocally confirms settlement and expresses no objection to quashing, and continuation would amount to abuse of process without serving any purpose. [Paras 6–9] India Law Library Docid # 2448217
(20) TELECOM REGULATORY AUTHORITY OF INDIA Vs. M/S POLIMER CABLE NETWORK AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 24-07-2026 Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, 1997 — Section 11, 13, 14, 29, 34 & 36 — Adjudicatory jurisdiction — Distinction between regulatory/enforcement functions of TRAI and adjudicatory jurisdiction of TDSAT — Held, TRAI's power under Ss. 11(1)(b) and 13 to issue directions for compliance with regulations is regulatory/administrative, not adjudicatory — Direction issued to MSO to restore signals pursuant to IC Regulations, and consequent show cause notice under S. India Law Library Docid # 2447943