India Law Library

ive

User not Logged..

Law Books shopping cart Launched! - Big Offers & Huge Discounts - All Law Books at One Place — Limited Time Deals!!

Free Artificial Intelligence Drafting

Free Artificial Intelligence Case Analyzer

Latest Cases

1
2
3
4
5
»
Last

(1) VINIT BAHRI AND ANOTHER Vs. M/S MGF DEVELOPERS LTD AND ANOTHER[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 04-04-2026
Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Section 2(1)(d) — Definition of 'consumer' — 'Commercial purpose' exclusion clause — Onus of proof — The service provider (developer) bears the onus to prove that a complainant obtained services for a commercial purpose to exclude them from the definition of 'consumer'. The complainant only needs to prove the initial elements of the definition.
India Law Library Docid # 2438988

(2) PRAMOD KUMAR AND OTHERS Vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 04-02-2026
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 173(8) — Further investigation — Police/investigating agency cannot conduct further investigation after a closure report has been accepted by the Magistrate without prior leave of the Magistrate or Court.
India Law Library Docid # 2438989

(3) RUPESH KUMAR MEENA Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 04-02-2026
Civil Services Examination — Cadre Allocation — Seniority — Claim for re-allocation to an 'insider' vacancy based on non-joining of candidates senior in merit list — Court held that such a process cannot be adopted as it would render cadre allocation fluid and unsettled for all time.
India Law Library Docid # 2438990

(4) MOHTASHEM BILLAH MALIK Vs. SANA AFTAB[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 04-02-2026
Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 — Section 25 — Custody of minor children — Determination of custody requires consideration of paramount welfare of children along with other factors like conduct of parties, financial capacity, standard of living, and comfort/education of children. High Court's view that only welfare is relevant is incorrect.
India Law Library Docid # 2438991

(5) U.P. JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL COUNCIL INSTRUCTOR WELFARE ASSOCIATION AND OTHERS Vs. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 04-02-2026
Right to Education Act, 2009 — Section 24(3) — Grievance redressal mechanism — While the Act provides for grievance redressal, it primarily pertains to defaults by teachers or disciplinary actions against them. It should not be read in isolation from other provisions and does not operate as an absolute bar to writ jurisdiction, especially when a matter has been adjudicated on merits.
India Law Library Docid # 2438992

(6) M/S EMINENT COLONIZERS PRIVATE LIMITED Vs. RAJASTHAN HOUSING BOARD AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 04-02-2026
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Section 11 — Appointment of Arbitrator — Pre-2015 Amendment regime — Precedential value of Section 11 Court's order — Where the Section 11 Court appointed an arbitrator, the order, being a judicial order, became final and binding on the parties and subsequent proceedings, including
India Law Library Docid # 2438993

(7) PARUL RUPARELLA AND ANOTHER Vs. CAMME WANG AND ANOTHER[CALCUTTA HIGH COURT] 04-02-2026
Trademarks Act, 1999 — Sections 29 and 53 — Infringement and Passing Off — Interim Injunction — Registered Trademark Holder's Claim — For an interim injunction in a suit for infringement and passing off, the plaintiff with a registered trademark is entitled to an order of injunction unless the defendant can establish continuous uninterrupted prior user — The court must assess if a strong prima facie
India Law Library Docid # 2438995

(8) HANSABEN W/O JIVAN BARIYA Vs. SAKARBHAI RAMBHAI SOLANKI AND OTEHRS[GUJARAT HIGH COURT] 04-02-2026
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Section 100 — Second Appeal — Scope — High Court can interfere with concurrent findings of fact by lower courts only if they are erroneous due to being contrary to mandatory provisions of law, settled legal position, based on inadmissible evidence, or arrived at without evidence — Reappreciation of evidence to reach another possible view is not permissible —
India Law Library Docid # 2438996

(9) PUNEET CHATURVEDI Vs. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH[CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT] 04-02-2026
Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), Section 528 — Quashing of FIR — Power to be exercised sparingly — Court cannot inquire about reliability/genuineness of allegations at FIR stage — Focus is on whether FIR discloses cognizable offence.
India Law Library Docid # 2438997

(10) M/S. FYSOLATE TECHNOLOGIES AND OTHERS Vs. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND OTHERS[ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT] 04-02-2026
Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 — Section 5(1) — Sale in the course of export — Meaning — Requires an integrated series of activities from agreement of sale with a foreign buyer to delivery for transport out of India, inextricably linked to the sale.
India Law Library Docid # 2438998

(11) ANIRUDDHA NAGAR Vs. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS[MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT] 04-02-2026
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 — Section 19(3) and Madhya Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1961 — Section 323 — Prosecution Sanction — Refusal of sanction by competent authority (President-in-Council) under PC Act cannot be set aside by exercising concurrent jurisdiction under State Act.
India Law Library Docid # 2438999

(12) SANTOSH @ CHINGYA SAINATH TARTE Vs. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, NANDED AND OTHERS[BOMBAY HIGH COURT (AURANGABAD BENCH)] 04-02-2026
Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug-offenders, Dangerous Persons, Video Pirates, Sand Smugglers, Persons Engaged in Black-Marketing of Essential Commodities, Illegal Gambling, Illegal Lottery and Human Trafficker Act, 1981 (MPDA Act) — Section 3(1) read with Section 2(b-1) — Detention order — Scope of — Subjective satisfaction of detaining authority — Bail
India Law Library Docid # 2439000

(13) INTEGRO FINSERV PRIVATE LIMITED Vs. SANTOSHKUMAR RAMSAJEEVAN DEWIVEDI AND ANOTHER[BOMBAY HIGH COURT] 04-02-2026
Execution of Warrants — Delays — Court expresses concern over significant delays in executing bailable and non-bailable warrants issued outside Maharashtra, leading to pending execution applications for years.
India Law Library Docid # 2439001

(14) C. VELUSAMY Vs. K INDHERA[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 03-02-2026
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Section 29A(5) — Extension of arbitrator's mandate — Court can entertain application to extend arbitrator's mandate even after an award is rendered, provided the award was made after the statutory time limit expired — Such an award is unenforceable, but it does not prevent the Court from exercising its power to extend the mandate.
India Law Library Docid # 2438937

(15) M/S AGARWAL ASSOCIATES (PROMOTERS) LTD Vs. M/S SHARDA DEVELOPERS[DELHI HIGH COURT] 03-02-2026
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Section 34, Section 37, Section 29 — High Courts' power of intervention under Article 226/227 of Constitution — Limited scope for interlocutory orders from Arbitral Tribunals — Proceedings before Arbitral Tribunal are subject to limited
India Law Library Docid # 2438965

(16) VARUN KUMAR SINGH Vs. STATE (SHO RAJINDER NAGAR)[DELHI HIGH COURT] 03-02-2026
Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 — Age determination — Bone Ossification Test — In cases of sexual assault under POCSO Act, when determining victim's age using bone age ossification test, the upper age given in the reference range should be considered.
India Law Library Docid # 2438966

(17) SAREGAMA INDIA LIMITED Vs. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND OTHERS[CALCUTTA HIGH COURT] 03-02-2026
West Bengal Land Reforms Act, 1955 — Section 4C — Conversion of land — Application for conversion dismissed on ground of petitioner being a lessee, not a raiyat — Petitioner owned 14.33 acres of land, which was within the 15-acre ceiling for non-agricultural land retention under Section 6(1)(c) of the West Bengal Estates Acquisition Act, 1953 — Retention under Section 6(1)(b) and (c) is automatic and effective from the date of vesting — An order under Section 6(3) requiring a specific use for fa
India Law Library Docid # 2438967

(18) THE STATE OF JHARKHAND AND OTHERS Vs. SANTOSH KUMAR SINGH[JHARKHAND HIGH COURT] 03-02-2026
Limitation Act, 1963 — Condonation of Delay — State Authorities — Bureaucratic delays — State machinery cannot claim a separate period of limitation and bureaucratic delays are not a sufficient cause for condoning inordinate delay in filing appeals — The law of limitation binds everyone, including the government.
India Law Library Docid # 2438968

(19) NER-II TRANSMISSION LTD. TO BE REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED REPRESENTATIVE NER-II TRANSMISSION LTD. AND OTHERS Vs. SUMITRA DEBBARMA AND OTHERS[TRIPURA HIGH COURT] 03-02-2026
Electricity Act, 2003 — Section 164 — Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 — Section 16(3) — Compensation for loss of trees and land use — Jurisdiction of District Judge — Award for loss of income from commercial exploitation of land is speculative and outside the scope of jurisdiction.
India Law Library Docid # 2438969

(20) P.SURESH Vs. D.KALAIVANI AND OTHERS[SUPRME COURT OF INDIA] 03-02-2026
Constitution of India, 1950 — Article 227 — High Court's power of superintendence — Exercise of power — Availability of alternative remedy — When a specific remedy is available in the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC), such as Order VII Rule 11 for rejection of a plaint, the High Court should not exercise its supervisory powers under Article 227 to achieve the same result. The power under
India Law Library Docid # 2438994

1
2
3
4
5
»
Last