India Law Library

User not Logged..

Law Books shopping cart Launched! - Big Offers & Huge Discounts - All Law Books at One Place — Limited Time Deals!!

Free Artificial Intelligence Case Analyzer

Latest Cases

First
«
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
»
Last

(721) SAKTHI SARAVANAN Vs. STATE OF TAMIL NADU[MADRAS HIGH COURT] 27-11-2025
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Sections 279, 337, and 304-A — Rash and Negligent Driving Causing Death and Hurt — Ingredients of Offence — "Rash" vs. "Negligent" Act — Section 304-A: requirement of "rash OR negligent" act; distinction between rash act (conscious disregard of serious risk) and negligent act (failure to take adequate care) — Mere high speed not sufficient for rashness; must prove driving was rash or negligent
India Law Library Docid # 2436648

(722) SURESH Vs. STATE[MADRAS HIGH COURT] 27-11-2025
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Sections 302 and 498A — Murder and Cruelty by Husband — Conviction solely based on Dying Declaration — Admissibility and Reliability of Dying Declaration when victim sustains 100% burn injuries and is administered sedative drugs (painkillers) — A dying declaration can be the sole basis for conviction if it is free from infirmity or doubt, but in cases of 100% burn injuries,
India Law Library Docid # 2436649

(723) L. ANNAPOORANI Vs. MANI[MADRAS HIGH COURT (MADURAI BENCH)] 27-11-2025
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 125 — Maintenance — Enhancement of Quantum — Petition for enhancement of maintenance amount awarded by Family Court — Matrimonial dispute leading to litigation settled by way of one-time settlement before the High Court — High Court passed directions based on "Terms of Agreement" entered into by the parties, providing for a total one-time settlement of Rs.
India Law Library Docid # 2436650

(724) SESSIONS JUDGE, MAHALIR NEETHIMANDRAM, ALLIKULAM, CHENNAI AND OTHERS Vs. SATHISH AND OTHERS[MADRAS HIGH COURT] 27-11-2025
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 302 — Murder — Conviction confirmed — Death Sentence modification/Commutation to Life Imprisonment — Accused pushed deceased, his former partner, onto railway track resulting in traumatic decapitation by approaching train due to failure of love affair and frustration (rejection of marriage proposal by deceased's family who opposed based on caste, joblessness, age, and habits) — Motive
India Law Library Docid # 2436651

(725) KRISHNAVENI AND OTHERS Vs. STATE[MADRAS HIGH COURT] 27-11-2025
Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO Act) — Sections 4, 6, and 17 — Sexual Offences — Trafficking — Penetrative Sexual Assault — Abetment — A1 and A2 (traffickers/prostitution ring leaders) convicted for trafficking a minor girl (PW2) and abetting penetrative sexual assault; A3 and A4 (customers) convicted for penetrative sexual assault — Prosecution established PW2's minority (age 14 at the time
India Law Library Docid # 2436765

(726) BABOO KHAN Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 27-11-2025
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Sections 498A and 304B — Dowry Death - Requirements for Dowry Demand — Conviction under S. 304B set aside - Demand for gold ornaments (ring and chain) during the customary 'chhoochhak' ceremony (after the birth of a child) does not constitute a "dowry demand" within the meaning and scope of S. 304B IPC, as dowry must be property or security given or agreed to
India Law Library Docid # 2437404

(727) DR. DHARMENDRA KUMAR Vs. BANARAS HINDU UNIVERSITY THR. ITS VICE CHANCELLOR. AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 27-11-2025
Civil Procedure — Appeals (Civil) — Maintainability and Disposal — Appeals arising from a selection process for Assistant Professor posts in a University — Appellants having secured appointments to higher posts (with one as Associate Professor in a different University) during the pendency of the appeal — Appellants stating they are no longer interested in prosecuting the appeals — Appeals disposed of as having become infructuous due to subsequent change in circumstances. (Paras 1, 2,
India Law Library Docid # 2437427

(728) ARUN KUMAR VISHWAKARMA Vs. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH[CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT] 27-11-2025
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 — Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) — Conviction and Sentence — Appeal against conviction — Essential ingredients of offence — Demand and acceptance of illegal gratification are sine qua non to constitute the offence — Mere recovery of tainted money, if divorced from proof of demand and voluntary acceptance as a bribe, is insufficient for conviction.
India Law Library Docid # 2437516

(729) SMT. RAJSHREE NAIDU AND OTHERS Vs. AJAY KUMAR REDDY AND OTHERS[CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT] 27-11-2025
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Section 96 — First Appeal — Divorce and Ejectment — Suit for possession, declaration, and injunction filed by husband (plaintiff) against ex-wife (Defendant No.1) and children (Defendants No. 3 and 4) from the wedlock, after dissolution of marriage — Whether ex-wife retains right to reside in the matrimonial home (suit house) after divorce — Right to residence under
India Law Library Docid # 2437537

(730) KALU KHAN AND OTHERS Vs. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN[RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT] 27-11-2025
Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 — Section 3(2)(v) — Ingredients and Applicability — The provision imposes aggravated punishment and requires two mandatory preconditions: (1) The underlying offence must be punishable under the Indian Penal Code with imprisonment for a term of ten years or more; and (2) The offence must have been committed because the victim is a member of a Scheduled Caste or Scheduled Tribe (caste-based animus) — Both
India Law Library Docid # 2437542

(731) ADNAN HAIDAR BHAI AND OTHER Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN[RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT] 27-11-2025
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Bail Application — Offences under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) Sections 308(2), 308(6), 318(2), 318(4), 319(2), 336(3), 338, 66C, 66D, and 61(2) — Serious nature of offence — Digital arrest and cyber-extortion, misuse of Information Technology — Petitioners extorted INR 2.02 Crores from elderly couple (aged over 84 years) by impersonation and threat of false
India Law Library Docid # 2437543

(732) M/S MANGI LAL MOTI LAL Vs. COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, ANTI EVASION, BIKANER.[RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT] 27-11-2025
Rajasthan Value Added Tax Act, 2003 — Section 84, Section 75(4) — Revision Petition — Remand Order — Foundational Defects in Assessment — Legality of Assessment — An assessment order vitiated by fundamental procedural defects, such as non-compliance with Section 75(4) concerning impounding of documents, absence of independent witnesses during survey, and failure to supply seizure memos, cannot be cured by a mere remand for fresh assessment; such procedural defects go to the
India Law Library Docid # 2437544

(733) ASHOK JETHWANI Vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX JODHPUR-1 AND OTHERS[RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT] 27-11-2025
Income Tax Act, 1961 — Sections 147, 148 — Reassessment proceedings — Validity of reassessment notice and order — Notice under Section 148 issued by Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO) and not Faceless Assessing Officer (FAO) — Following controlling High Court and Bombay High Court precedents (Shree Cement Limited and Hexaware Technologies Ltd.), a notice under Section 148 issued by JAO is held invalid where the Faceless provisions apply — Consequently, the subsequent
India Law Library Docid # 2437545

(734) BIMALA KUMARI AND OTHERS Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND OTHERS[RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT (JAIPUR BENCH)] 27-11-2025
Service Law — Recruitment — Qualification for Physical Training Instructor (PTI) Grade-III — Equivalence of Qualifications — The advertisement required Bachelor of Physical Education (B.P.Ed.) or equivalent qualifications recognized by NCTE (National Council for Teacher Education) — Appellants possessed a three-year Bachelor of Physical Education (BPE) degree course — NCTE clarified that the three-year BPE degree course is a professional qualification, and persons holding it
India Law Library Docid # 2437766

(735) YATENDRA KUMAR NAGORI Vs. THE SPECIAL SECRETARY CUM VICE-CHAIRPERSON(KVS) AND OTHERS[RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT (JAIPUR BENCH)] 27-11-2025
Service Law — Termination of Service — Teacher — Immoral Conduct/Sexual Harassment — Judicial Review — Petitioner, a teacher in Kendriya Vidyalaya, terminated after preliminary and summary inquiries found him guilty of immoral sexual behavior and misbehavior towards a minor female student (Class VI) — Allegations included improper touching and inappropriate remarks — High Court
India Law Library Docid # 2437767

(736) DEV NARAYAN GURJAR Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND OTHERS[RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT (JAIPUR BENCH)] 27-11-2025
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 195(1)(b)(i) — Bar to taking cognizance — Offence under Indian Penal Code (IPC) Section 211 (False charge of offence made with intent to injure) — Where an offence under Section 211 IPC is alleged to have been committed in, or in relation to, any proceeding in any Court, cognizance by the Magistrate is barred unless the complaint is made in writing by that
India Law Library Docid # 2437768

(737) STATE OF GUJARAT Vs. VALLABHBHAI JERAMBHAI GOTI AND OTHERS[GUJARAT HIGH COURT] 27-11-2025
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 378 — Appeal against acquittal — Powers of Appellate Court — An appellate court has full power to review, re-appreciate, and reconsider evidence — However, two presumptions favour the accused: the fundamental presumption of innocence, reinforced by the acquittal— If two reasonable conclusions are possible on the evidence, the appellate court should not disturb the lower
India Law Library Docid # 2437850

(738) GOKUL MRUGESH JAYKRUSHNA Vs. SPECIAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT (APPEALS) AND OTHERS[GUJARAT HIGH COURT] 27-11-2025
Bombay Land Revenue Code, 1879 — Section 135C and 135D — Gujarat Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1947 (Fragmentation Act) — Revenue Records (RTS Proceedings) — Mutation of Entry based on Registered Sale Deed — Scope of Revenue Authorities' Jurisdiction — Revenue authorities, in RTS proceedings (Rule 108 of BLR Rules), cannot decide title or validity of a transaction (such as alleged violation of Fragmentation Act or agriculturist status under other
India Law Library Docid # 2437851

(739) TELE NETWORK PVT LTD THRO' MANAGING DIRECTOR Vs. DIRECTOR OF RELIEF[GUJARAT HIGH COURT] 27-11-2025
Limitation Act, 1963 — Article 22 — Suit for recovery of money deposited under agreement payable on demand (Security Deposit) — Limitation period is three years from the date demand is made — Suit filed on 29.11.2005 for refund of security deposit; first demand made on 07.01.2000 — Subsequent communications demanding refund do not extend the period of limitation — Period of limitation expired on 06.01.2003 — Suit
India Law Library Docid # 2437852

(740) KANHAIYA LAL THROUGH SPA HOLDER Vs. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND OTHERS[DELHI HIGH COURT] 26-11-2025
Letters Patent Appeal (LPA) — Scope of Interference — Dismissal of Writ Petition — Maintainability — Appeal filed against the dismissal of a writ petition claiming proprietary and easementary rights over an adjacent plot of land and challenging the Delhi Development Authority's (DDA) actions; the appellate court found that the Single Judge had meticulously dealt with all contentions and dismissed
India Law Library Docid # 2435952

First
«
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
»
Last