ive
User not Logged..
India's Biggest Headnotes Library over 53.69 Lakhs Headnotes
    Free Artificial Intelligence Drafting  

    Free Artificial Intelligence Case Analyzer  

   AI Submission Generator   

Latest Cases

(741) HIMANSHU SINGH AND OTHERS Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 23-09-2025
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 — Section 156(3) — Registration of FIR and Investigation — Preliminary enquiry by CBI found a cognizable offence — CBI directed to register a case under appropriate provisions of law and proceed with investigation.
India Law Library Docid # 2433538

(742) IN RE: ISSUES RELATING TO ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS PREVAILING IN THE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 23-09-2025
Environmental Law — Public Interest Litigation — Suo motu registration of writ petition to address ecological and environmental issues in Himachal Pradesh following unprecedented monsoon rains causing widespread damage.
India Law Library Docid # 2433463

(743) PARVEEN GARVI Vs. AVIVA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY INDIA LTD.[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 23-09-2025
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Order 6 Rule 17 — Amendment of pleadings — Court may allow amendment at any stage to determine real question in controversy — Proviso: No amendment after commencement of trial unless due diligence shown.
India Law Library Docid # 2433926

(744) ONKAR SINGH AND OTHERS Vs. SURINDER SINGH AND OTHERS[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 23-09-2025
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Order 7 Rule 11 (d) — Rejection of Plaint — Limitation — Once fraud is pleaded in the plaint, the limitation period to file suit for cancellation of sale deed begins from the date of knowledge of the fraud, not necessarily from the date of registration of the sale deed.
India Law Library Docid # 2433928

(745) STATE OF RAJASTHAN Vs. GIRDHARI LAL AND OTHERS[RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT] 23-09-2025
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Sections 302 and 307 — Acquittal by Trial Court — Appeal by State — Reversal of acquittal on appeal — Principles — Interference with acquittal only if perverse, based on misreading of evidence, or only one reasonable view consistent with guilt is possible.
India Law Library Docid # 2433967

(746) MALA RAM AND OTHERS Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND OTHERS[RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT] 23-09-2025
Rajasthan Land Revenue Act, 1956 — Section 16 — Creation of new Revenue Villages — Executive function — Process of creating new revenue villages is an administrative act, not legislative, as it involves specific decisions for particular areas and aims at effective governance and development, not general rule-making.
India Law Library Docid # 2433968

(747) SMT. IMRATI DEVI Vs. NATTHA RAM[RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT] 23-09-2025
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — Section 166 — Compensation — Enhancement — Deceased was involved in mining and agriculture — Tribunal assessed monthly income at Rs. 4,914/- based on unskilled labour — Evidence showed deceased owned heavy machinery, paid substantial EMIs for a crane loan (Rs. 35,170/- per month), and held statutory consents for mining — Deceased also owned agricultural land —
India Law Library Docid # 2433969

(748) SHALU JAIN Vs. MS SHIVCHARANDAS AND SONS AND OTHERS[RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT] 23-09-2025
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Section 11(6) — Application for appointment of sole arbitrator — Partnership deed — Death of partner — Legal heir's right to invoke arbitration clause — Applicant, daughter of deceased partner, sought induction into partnership and invoked arbitration clause based on partnership deed — Preliminary objections raised by respondents that applicant was not a party to deed
India Law Library Docid # 2433970

(749) ANIL Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN[RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT] 23-09-2025
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Sections 302, 498-A, 201 — Murder, Cruelty by husband or relatives of husband, Causing disappearance of evidence of offence — Dying declarations — Reliability — Validity of dying declarations depends on whether they were made when the victim was in a fit mental and physical state — Prosecution must prove that the person recording the statement verified this fitness
India Law Library Docid # 2433971

(750) ASHOK KUMAR Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN[RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT] 23-09-2025
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 302 — Murder — Conviction altered to Section 304 Part I (Culpable homicide not amounting to murder) — Factors considered: Lack of premeditation and motive, sudden quarrel, absence of undue advantage or cruelty, fatal injury being one of several.
India Law Library Docid # 2433972

(751) BOOTA SINGH Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND OTHERS[RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT] 23-09-2025
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 302 — Murder — Circumstantial evidence — Prosecution case relied heavily on eyewitness testimony, but the court found significant inconsistencies and doubts regarding the eyewitness's presence and credibility. The court also noted issues with the investigation, including delayed recording of statements and questionable recovery procedures. The court held that the
India Law Library Docid # 2433973

(752) VIMLA DEVI LUNIA Vs. UNION OF INDIA[RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT] 23-09-2025
Income Tax Act, 1961 — Sections 147, 148, 143(3) — Reopening of assessment — Escaped income — Petitioner filed return, faced scrutiny assessment, and received assessment order under Section 143(3) — Subsequently, notice under Section 148 was issued alleging receipt of unsecured loan of Rs. 2,36,66,658/- that escaped assessment — Petitioner claimed to have given loan, not received it, and provided
India Law Library Docid # 2433974

(753) M/S. UMMED ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND OTHERS[RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT (JAIPUR BENCH)] 23-09-2025
Rajasthan Transparency in Public Procurement Rules, 2013 — Rules 59, 60, 61, 2013 — Tender Conditions — e-NIB No. 1/25-26, Condition No. 4 — Submission of GSTR-3B — Petitioner declared non-responsive for failure to submit latest GSTR-3B by the last date for bid submission — GSTR-3B for March 2024-25 filed belatedly after the bid submission deadline — Held, requirement of submitting latest GSTR-3B was mandatory
India Law Library Docid # 2433960

(754) STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH Vs. SONI AND ANOTHER[HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 23-09-2025
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) — Sections 50, 20 — Offence of possessing Charas — Appeal against acquittal — Trial court acquitted accused based on the reasoning that the SFSL report did not mention the percentage of Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) to classify the substance as Charas, citing a previous
India Law Library Docid # 2434022

(755) SMT. AMAR KAUR AND OTHERS Vs. SH. RISHIB KUMAR[HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 23-09-2025
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Section 151 — Inherent powers of Court — Application for proving Hindi version of exhibited Urdu documents — Dismissal by Appellate Court — Held, Appellate Court misdirected itself by treating the application as one for leading additional evidence under Order 18 Rule 17 CPC — The prayer was to place on record translated copies of already exhibited documents, not to lead new
India Law Library Docid # 2434023

(756) MARS BOTTLERS UNA PRIVATE LIMITED Vs. STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AND OTHERS[HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 23-09-2025
Himachal Pradesh Excise Act, 2011 — Sections 29(b), 29(c), 30(1), 30(2), 31, 39(3), 39(4), 43(b), 43(d), 44(b), 66(2) and Chapter VIII — Suspension of Licence — Contradictory statements in Inspection Report and FIR — Petitioner's plea that inspection was not conducted and no liquor was detected — Inconsistencies regarding identity of person to whom vehicle custody was handed over, status of person, disappearance of
India Law Library Docid # 2434024

(757) PURVISH INDRAKANT SHAH AND OTHERS Vs. SHYAMAL JAGDISHCHANDRA SHETH[GUJARAT HIGH COURT] 23-09-2025
Trade Mark Law — Assignment of Trademark — Effect of Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) — An MoU can constitute a written agreement for assignment of trademark rights, transferring exclusive ownership to the assignee upon fulfilling the agreed payment terms.
India Law Library Docid # 2434177

(758) UMAR HARIS Vs. YUSRA MERAJ AND OTHERS[DELHI HIGH COURT] 23-09-2025
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — Section 528 — Quashing of proceedings — Maintenance Petition — Settlement Agreement — Rights of child not impacted by Settlement between parents — Wife cannot compromise child's right to maintenance — Divorcee wife entitled to maintenance under Section 125 of Cr.P.C. irrespective of divorce grounds — Estoppel principle not absolute for child's
India Law Library Docid # 2434228

(759) REVACURE LIFESCIENCES LLP AND OTHERS Vs. STATE GOVT OF NCT DELHI AND OTHERS[DELHI HIGH COURT] 23-09-2025
Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 — Sections 13, 27, 32 — Offences under Chapter IV — Registration of FIR and investigation by Police — Not permissible — Only specified persons under Section 32 are empowered — Police officer cannot register FIR under Section 154 Cr.P.C. or investigate cognizable offences under Chapter IV of the Act.
India Law Library Docid # 2434229

(760) CHAND MIYAN Vs. STATE (NCT OF DELHI)[DELHI HIGH COURT] 23-09-2025
Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 — Section 6 — Aggravated penetrative sexual assault — Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 376(2) — Rape — Age of victim — Child — Presumption under Section 29 POCSO — Foundational facts — Case involved a prosecutrix who was 8 years and 3 months old at the time of the alleged incident, falling within the definition of "child" under
India Law Library Docid # 2434230