(41) SMT. SANGEETA ARAWALIA AND OTHERS Vs. ESCORTS HEART INSTITUTE & RESEARCH CENTRE LTD. AND OTHERS[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 01-07-2026 Medical Negligence — Angioplasty and Stenting — Death of patient post-procedure — Allegations of incorrect treatment choice, doctor's inexperience, and hasty discharge — Court found no negligence as procedure was technically feasible, scientifically correct, and performed with informed consent after considering alternatives like CABG, India Law Library Docid # 2447864
(42) BRANCH MANAGER, LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER Vs. MORE ANITHA[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 01-07-2026 Insurance Law — Repudiation of Life Insurance Claim — Non-disclosure of Pre-existing Ailment — Insurer repudiated claim based on undisclosed lung cancer — The insured had undergone treatment for lung cancer prior to policy inception, which was a material fact that should have been disclosed. India Law Library Docid # 2447935
(43) YASHODA HEALTHCARE SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED Vs. CHEKURI LAKSHMI NARAYANA[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 01-07-2026 Consumer Protection Act, 2019 — Section 34(2) — Jurisdiction for filing a consumer complaint — A complaint can be filed where the complainant resides, even if the cause of action arose elsewhere, provided the complainant has established residence there. India Law Library Docid # 2447936
(44) IREO GRACE REALTECH PVT. LTD. Vs. SAKSHI ABRAHAM AND OTHERS[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 30-06-2026 Consumer Protection Act, 2019 — Section 51 — Appeal against State Commission order — Condonation of delay — Delay in filing appeal was condoned considering the matter had travelled to the Supreme Court and the appeal was filed shortly after the Supreme Court's order, and the delay was not opposed by the India Law Library Docid # 2447934
(45) MRS. DEVI RAMAKRISHNAN Vs. M/S VISHWAKARMA REAL ESTATE AND CONSTRUCTIONS (INDIA) PVT. LTD. AND OTHERS[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 25-06-2026 Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Deficiency in Service — Delay in Possession — Builder failed to deliver flat by the agreed date, causing significant delay and hardship to the complainant. India Law Library Docid # 2447937
(46) VENEET VASUDEVA AND ANOTHER Vs. M/S. OMAXE BUILDHOME PVT. LTD.[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 25-06-2026 Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Section 12 — Deficiency in Service — Delayed Possession — Builder failed to deliver possession of apartment within the stipulated period as per the Apartment Buyer's Agreement. India Law Library Docid # 2447938
(47) MRS. SWATI HEMANT HADKE AND OTHERS Vs. TITAN COMPANY LTD. (THROUGH CEO) AND OTHERS[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 25-06-2026 Consumer Protection Act, 2019 — Section 36(2) — Dismissal of Complaint — Allegations of fraud and cheating — Consumer forums have limited jurisdiction and cannot adjudicate cases involving complex factual disputes or criminal acts like fraud, which require detailed evidence and cross-examination. India Law Library Docid # 2447939
(48) POST GRADUATE INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL EDUCATION AND REASEARCH CHANDIGARH, THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR Vs. AYUSH KALPASI[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 22-06-2026 Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Negligence in medical treatment — Burn injury sustained by patient post-surgery — Hospital's defence that no heater was present in April rejected — Principle of res ipsa loquitor applied due to lack of explanation from hospital for the injury. India Law Library Docid # 2447940
(49) M/S. ELECTRONICS AND GIFT Vs. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD.[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 19-06-2026 Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Section 21(b) — Revision Petition — Insurance claim — Burglary/house-breaking — State Commission set aside District Commission's order allowing claim — National Commission finds State Commission erred in restrictive interpretation of policy and facts. India Law Library Docid # 2447941
(50) AXIS BANK LTD. Vs. BALJIT KAUR AND OTHERS[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 19-06-2026 Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Section 21(b) — Revisional Jurisdiction — Limited scope — Interference only in cases of jurisdictional error, patent illegality, material irregularity, or manifest perversity — Not to act as an appellate authority over concurrent findings of fact. India Law Library Docid # 2447942
(51) BALWANT SHUKLA Vs. THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 18-06-2026 Insurance Law — Standard Fire & Special Perils Policy — Burden of Proof — Insured must prove loss falls within policy coverage and was caused by an insured peril, not just that goods were damaged. India Law Library Docid # 2447924
(52) FIL INDUSTRIES Vs. JAHANGIR AHMED PARA[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 18-06-2026 Consumer Protection Act, 2019 — Section 38(3)(a) — Written Statement — Filing Period — The Act prescribes a period of thirty days for filing a written statement, extendable by a maximum of fifteen days, totaling forty-five days. India Law Library Docid # 2447925
(53) M/S ALIENS DEVELOPERS (P) LTD. AND OTHERS Vs. VUMMANNAGARI RAMACHANDRA REDDY[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 17-06-2026 Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Section 19 — Appeal against State Commission's order — Dismissal of application for rectification/clarification — Order directing refund of Rs — 43,50,000/- with interest and compensation upheld. India Law Library Docid # 2447926
(54) ICICI BANK LIMITED Vs. SUMEET KAELEY[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 16-06-2026 Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Section 21(b) — Revision Petition — Repossession of vehicle — Deficiency in service — Unfair trade practice — Forcible repossession without proper notice amounts to deficiency in service. India Law Library Docid # 2447927
(55) M/S TSR COTTON GINNING MILL Vs. ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 15-06-2026 Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Section 2(1)(d) — Definition of "Consumer" — Insurance policy obtained for commercial purposes — Insured is considered a consumer for services of the insurer in relation to claim settlement. India Law Library Docid # 2447928
(56) VARDAAN TRADELINK PVT LTD Vs. SH MOHAMMAD YASEEN[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 12-06-2026 Limitation Act, 1963 — Section 5 — Delay Condonation — Inordinate delay of 368 days in filing revision petition — Petitioner's explanation based on counsel's and director's ailments supported by private doctor certificates — Insufficient and vague explanation for the entire period of delay — General averments and peculiar India Law Library Docid # 2447929
(57) THE BRANCH MANAGER, NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED Vs. SANJEEV KUMAR[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 12-06-2026 Consumer Protection Act, 2019 — Section 58(1)(b) — Revisional jurisdiction — Limited scope — Cannot re-appreciate evidence or interfere with concurrent findings of fact unless there is patent perversity or illegality. India Law Library Docid # 2447930
(58) JUSTICE RAJESH CHANDRA (RETD.) Vs. AIR INDIA LIMITED[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 12-06-2026 Consumer Protection Act, 2019 — Section 2(46) and Deficiency in Service — Allegations of unfair contract, if factually disclose deficiency in service, can be entertained as such — Incorrect nomenclature in complaint does not defeat substantive grievance. India Law Library Docid # 2447931
(59) LATE JAGDISH PRASAD GAUD AND OTHERS Vs. STATE BANK OF INDIA AND OTHERS[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 11-06-2026 Consumer Protection Act, 2019 — Section 58(1)(b) — Condonation of delay — Revision petition filed after a significant delay of 760 days — Reasons provided by the petitioner, including the original complainant's old age, ailments, lack of awareness of the order, and time taken by legal heirs to collect documents and obtain India Law Library Docid # 2447932
(60) RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. AND OTHERS Vs. HARJINDER SINGH AND OTHERS[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 10-06-2026 Insurance Law — Personal Accident Policy — Claim repudiation — Insurers argued death was due to pre-existing illness and not accident, citing post-mortem findings of septicaemia, lung and heart disease — However, the post-mortem also noted a frontal bone fracture, which the court found sufficient to cause death and India Law Library Docid # 2447933